A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
That last sentence is especially important. The vast majority of the times when cyclists break traffic laws is WHEN THEY'RE FORCED TO.
When there's no bike infrastructure that allows bikers to travel safely and adequately then they're left with no other choice
Want bikers to follow traffic laws more? Literally just make a reasonable way for them to do it
“Thing everyone has known for decades is now officially documented, yet will continue to be ignored.”
New study is cool, but old studies in the US have found this to be true as well.
Do you know which studies?
No but they were in NYC, because I remember reading about this on StreetsBlog NYC like ten years ago. Sorry, would have linked them if I had them on hand.
People like to think that bicyclists are breaking laws all the time because they assume that bicycles must be treated as either cars or pedestrians. They are, in fact, a secret third thing with their own set of laws. Motorists don't know those laws because they have no reason to look them up. It's easier to just assume that the bicycle on the road/on the sidewalk/not stopping for the stop sign must be breaking the law because it would be illegal for a car to do it.
Cyclists go through red lights when it makes sense. Who wants to wait for dumb traffic signals when the road is empty and the infrastructure been built to protect pedestrians from cars (and cars from cars).
If a cyclist goes through a red light, the cyclist is dead*. If a car goes through a red light, the cyclist dead.
*yes, technically it could be worse for others too
Precisely:
This was backed up by traffic officer PC Mark Hodson of West Midlands police who said that the “effects of behavior that people are moaning about is negligible. If you look at the statistics, if you look at the actual threat of harm, cyclists aren’t posing a risk to anybody.”
Fuck the premise that bikes should follow the same laws as cars.
Keep yourself safe and alive. Fuck the law.
Interesting. Now check how many motorists are killed by cyclists and vice versa.
An easy is not texting for doom scrolling while driving.
To get at what really matters, you have to multiply the infractions times the danger each one poses to others.
When they do break a law it almost never results in someone else's death.