this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
103 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

15902 readers
123 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/30733236

This map shows the average commuting time from home to work in Europe.

(Author: Maps.interlude, Link to image information and dfferent resolutions )

It might be surprising that, in spite of wildly different traffic systems and large differences in the use share of cars, these times are so similar.

An explanation is given in the wikipedia article on Marchetti's Constant. Basically, the time spent commuting is mostly an anthropological constant, and is largely independent of means of transport and culture.

In other words, if we use faster means of transport, we almost automatically commute larger distances - regardless whether this improves our quality of life or not.

This relationship should probably be central in modern traffic planning, but it is often not considered. (There is an interesting article in German by the traffic scientist Rudolf Pfleiderer, titled "Das Phänomen Verkehr", which describes in more detail the relationships between traffic, speed, and distance - perhaps somebody knows a good English article?)

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'll take a 30 min walk/bike ride down a country path over a 20 min car drive through constant traffic in a city.

Commute time isn't really the main factor, how enjoyable or miserable is it?

And yes I will take that bike ride in the rain too. Left my old job because they moved the office to become over an hour on the train, new job is a half hour bike ride down an old railway line.

[–] halloejsovs@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is my situation exactly. Love the one hour free workout I get every 5/7 days a week.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah I used to have a 40 minute subway commute time, but the stations were a few blocks from either end and I read or listened to music / podcasts on the way. Even when the train was crowded it was fairly pleasant.

Similar for a 12.5 mile bike commute I used to do.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I would love to know the mode of transportation used for these commutes.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Isn't that the point here? Mode of transportation doesn't matter. People seem to quite universally set the same limits and it's based on time needed. Better, faster or more efficient modes of transportation simply change the distance people consider for jobs.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Im not sure. This study says the active modes of transport tend to have a shorter commute duration.

So they may be pulling the numbers down in OP's graph

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X22000138

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Well that makes sense. I rode my bike 75 minutes to and from work a few times, because my workplace had a gym and I could shower. Without a shower, I would have created unpleasant workplace conditions for everyone around me after that commute.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

I don't get how this is any sort of "constant' - surely it's multi-modal with loads of variance. I don't like averaging over such distributions. I'd think a distributional analysis or cluster analysis would be more interesting than averages. And I just don't think "constant" is anywhere near the right word for whatever phenomenon this is describing.

The wiki doesn't give much detail on their sampling frame for proving this "constant". I suspect it might be a weak and biassed dataset.

I WFH 4 days a week normally, so i have quite a variance over the week [<00:05, <00:05, <00:05, 01:30, <00:05].

  • more extreme variance if you count stopping off in the pub as "commute" time. So not "constant".

People like farmers typically/traditionally have quite short 'commutes' - but then they move around a lot from task to task. But office/factory workers will probably have longer commutes. Lots of other peripatetic or locum workers, taxis and deliveroos will inherently vary depending on the first customer/job of the day.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What the hell is going on in Malta? It's takes like an hour to drive across that whole place, how did they fuck up so bad that their average commute time is half a cross-country trip?

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, probably Marchetti's constant again; I guess that many people will just walk to their destination in half an hour, because why not?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

Ah yea, makes sense. If I lived there I'd walk too.

[–] minty@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Mine is 2-2.5 hours, when I go into office anyway. Work from home is so good for me, couldn't imagine doing that every morning and night.

And yes I live in the country

[–] Steve@communick.news 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This makes perfect sense, no matter the mode of transport.
People are going to choose where to work or live so their commute is this kind of time range.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

2 days per week I have a 90 minute commute. 3 days I have 0. So my average is 36, which is bit above the nationl avergae

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago

Te fuck? My commute has usually been 1-2 hours one way. It's why I quit.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

The Greece figure looks wildly inaccurate, at least for the 50% of the population that lives in Athens.