this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
120 points (97.6% liked)

politics

29987 readers
2190 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnetosphere@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)

As maddening as this is, I can’t say I blame them. Being poor in America is designed to suck. Then again, they’re the generation that helped make it that way, so…

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 minutes ago

Well you know when they're the ones that design the system. And they're the ones that purposely made being poor a crime and anything but desirable. Of course they're going to fear the system that they created.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 minutes ago

The headline alone is bullshit. They can annuitize their savings if they want to, but they don't. Great, the whole article is pointless. Classic Fortune writing.

But I do think guaranteed pensions need to come back, and that right soon.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

My wife's grandmother was expecting to die at age 90. So she burned through most of her retirement money. Now she only has 10% of it and she's 92 years old. She downgraded her living space a few times already.

I'm a bit terrified about what the future brings for her when she's still alive and she runs out of money fully.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 71 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

If only they had voted for the candidates who wanted a strong social safety net, rather than the ones that wanted to fuck everyone who isn't part of the 0.1%, maybe they wouldn't have to worry now...

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

bernie was who we needed - instead we got trump ala hillary

[–] Janx@piefed.social 6 points 1 hour ago

That sounds like socialism, which is the same as communism, since they don't understand that either. All they know is that they lived through the Red Scare, and grew up thinking evil Soviet Communists were going to nuke the world...

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 27 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And the idea of a safety net has been around for a long time, in various forms, yet somehow helping everyone has always been a bad thing to do.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 2 points 33 minutes ago

Because somehow enough people were convinced anything that wasn't democracy was communism but also that capitalist fascism is actually democracy

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

My dad lost all his assets to cancer bills, as did my father in law, and my husband's family lost the house built by their grandfather due to having to settle the nursing home debt after my mother in law died.

I do not expect any inheritance from my mom, since I want her to use it all to take care of herself.

We really really need a single payer healthcare system. Those last dozen years of a person's life are where the medical industrial complex makes obscene bank.

I can not begin to explain the level of my contempt for networks like FoxNews..

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 31 minutes ago

It confounds me that my father can be such a bigot and against social reform after being left destitute after my step mom passed following seven years of cancer treatment before passing way. I think he wants everyone else to suffer like he does instead of wanting there to be less suffering. I used to be really close to him but I refuse to have a relationship with him anymore.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 34 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's not an age thing, it's a class thing. This is just a psyop to direct anger away from the Epstein class.

No war, but class war.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 16 points 2 hours ago

Absolutely. Note that the only boomers who are able to hoard money are the ones who have it to hoard.

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Jesus what a horrible generation. The greatest generation gave birth to the absolute worst generation.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Can't they just calculate annual costs times yearly inflation against life expectancy... And add an emergency fund and some luxury options then boom. They'd know where they're at rather than worrying.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 1 points 32 minutes ago

Can't they just calculate annual costs times yearly inflation against life expectancy...

The article explains that both these things have changed quite a bit since they started planning for their retirement.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 31 points 3 hours ago

Meanwhile everyone else outlives their money every couple weeks.

[–] MrSelfDestruct@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

More for us when they die

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Now, now. There's a handful of millennials waiting to hoard it after they die. This is how the trickle-down works, people, let it trickle.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 9 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I’m sure it will trickle down eventually.

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It is trickling down. Everyone is just looking at the pyramid upside down.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Pee and blood both flow downhill. Not sure about assets.

[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If they're not hoarding it, they're pissing it all away on their healthcare anyway as go on to eventually start fucking dying as old people tend to do.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

I wish most of them would die already so I could piss on their graves.