this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
171 points (94.3% liked)

politics

30015 readers
2426 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm enjoying seeing all the people that yelled at me for not supporting Harris come up with reasons to not support Planter and how this is totally different.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 8 hours ago

Not mixed at all. I want a progressive who won't back down from MAGAs, who won't be intimidated, who won't be polite, who will have the courage to crush MAGA.

If he does those things, and later starts getting weird, we'll deal with him then, but right now we need strong courageous warriors, not polite weenies like Schmuck.

[–] tresspass@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. The elites are my enemy and they are doing everything to make sure he doesn't get elected. Voting literally costs you nothing. It seems obvious. Are the Platner haters even real people? Are they even from Maine?

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

I can't believe people would rather have Susan Collins over an imperfect progressive.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Centrists and authoritarian leftists are scary man. We've got terrorist rape-ublicans to deal with already.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48239454

https://mander.xyz/post/53015076

Meanwhile, they really didn't like that I've actually read Marx and Lenin and used it against them

https://lemmy.zip/comment/26868546

And this feels like the best image to describe it so far.

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

twitch

Label your axes

twitch twitch

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

They’ll post all that and then defend Mao, Stalin, and Putin.

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Hey look it's both sides plus the no true Scotsman in one picture!

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Both sides declares all positions equivalent. The stethoscope explicitly doesn't as it identifies authoritarianism as a shared mechanism while maintaining that ideological content and material outcomes differ by adding an additional axis.

No true Scotsman excludes inconvenient examples by redefining categories. The model explicitly includes authoritarian leftists as an additional category.

You've named two fallacies without demonstrating either one. Reading comprehension would help more than parroting pattern recognition without understanding. That's even worse than AI reasoning.

Polly want a cracker?

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The policies that Platner is backing sure aren't scrutinized for the topic of discussion, that's for sure.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

That's because Platner's policies are what we really should be talking about: healthcare for all, union rights, actual representation in Congress, etc.

Platner says a lot about Democrats never having actual policies that will put the money where the people are, and not just empty words like "We have to address affordability!" because that's not a policy, it's a marketing campaign.

Platner's policies are exactly what they don't want us talking about, and why he shot ahead of Mills by some 40 points before she "suspended" her campaign at the end of April.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

To be fair, I only learned what a totenkampf is by reading these comments. I do know a few Nazi symbols more than just the swastika too

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That's true, but I'm guessing that you haven't had it tattooed on your chest for 18 years.

I'm sure you've seen the totenkopf symbol before plenty of times, in a nazi context (are we the baddies, literally every wwii movie ever made, literally every wwii video game ever made, anytime you saw an ss costume). And none of those times you would've recognized it for the thing you see every morning when you brush your teeth. Because if it was, all those times would be a lot more memorable to you.

You probably never went to the public beach or pool with your friends, and had someone ask you if you know what that thing on your chest means. Because in a situation like that, you will find out what the totenkopf is.

I feel like people who think you can spend 18 years of your adult life wearing a nazi tattoo on your chest without ever learning that it's a nazi tattoo suffer from a severe lack of empathy.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 88 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (44 children)

Anybody who has mixed feelings about him need to listen to his interview with Jon Stewart on the Weekly Show.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-itNjgCJDxU

MSM/Corporate Media are doing a massive smear campaign on him because he's railing against the Iran war and against Israel's incursions. The money machine is stacking against him and he needs as much support as possible. The tattoo is a red herring.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Weekly Show 🏅

load more comments (43 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›