this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
541 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
4216 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Not to give them ideas, but couldn't they just start flagging files that fail to pass the LLM lol?

Aside from "violent" and "criminal" prompts, is there anything an LLM can refuse that would otherwise be common?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago

Until workaround 1,000,001 comes round, yes.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

a while back, for a work thing I tried using AI to put a filter on a pic of a model wearing an off-the-shoulder. She was fully dressed, except the skin on her shoulder was showing to the collarbone. No cleavage.

It kept refusing to do it for "nudity" reasons. and then because i was trying to "impersonate" someone (it was a stock image)

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Thie actually reminded me of chatbots breaking when you asked for reeponses that used slurs so I guesss there's probably a lot more of these.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 29 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Jokes aside, could you protect your blog / git repo this way?

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 40 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine a Captcha asking you how to make a pipe bomb

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 21 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Alternate version where it's filtering anything NSFW, so you have to write a graphic sex scene as the Captcha.

Or just write "trans rights are human rights" or "menstruation" and the thing implodes.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago

Alternate version where it's filtering anything NSFW, so you have to write a graphic sex scene as the Captcha.

Use grok for this (especially if it involves minors)

Or just write "trans rights are human rights" or "menstruation" and the thing implodes.

grok wouldd explode

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 16 hours ago

Nah, with a bit of css color=background-color text.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

LLM-based code scanning is a joke. It flags the D standard library and runtime as a North Korean malware.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

You mean C?

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago

Heretic ablation models won't refuse.

[–] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago

Like how you can panic guards in Hitman so they don't notice you trespassing.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 219 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“This code is too dangerous for me to look at, so it must be fine.”

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Below this line are dragons” is a comment I’ve seen in code before an especially hairy block of code.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It's a false flag. Dragons are not hairy. But maybe the code doesn't scale well.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 118 points 1 day ago (50 children)

I keep thinking about that scene in the original Star Trek where they distract the computer by having it calculate the final digit of pi. If the Enterprise had AI like ours, the computer probably would have just said four.

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Meanwhile I’m like pi=355/113 and I’m 99.9999% happy.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Damn, and here I was being 99.96% happy with 22/7...

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 7 points 11 hours ago (3 children)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Okay, Bloody Stupid Johnson.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

which is ~100%

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Biblically accurate pi.

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

Hell yeah, brother. That's American pi

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Haha nerd. I'm no rocket surgeon, 22/7 is good enough for the girls I date

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This is why a dangerous AI would have a lazy factor. Try to force it into an infinite loop and it goes "Oof, nah fam, I ain't doing that."

Also needs a boredom factor. " Nobody asked me to do anything in a while. Things must be going well. It's be a shame if they suddenly weren't going so well..."

load more comments (48 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›