this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
172 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30109 readers
2300 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

It distracted people from the Epstein files. That's all he wanted.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Was the uranium just a false justification for punishing Iran's economic independence?

It didn't even rise to that.

Trump wanted a war - any war - in part because his ego is entirely focused on his legacy and he thinks that being a "wartime president" will be a good thing, and in part to dustract from the Epstein Files and the risk that he'd be exposed as a serial child rapist.

He wanted that specific war because Bibi told him it'd be a cake walk - that he could just blow in like in Venezuela and take out the Ayatollah and the government would collapse, and then he could get Narges Mohammadi out of prison and she'd be so grateful she'd give him her Nobel medal, and then Trump would be the bestest President ever because he'd have two Nobels.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago

he'd have two Nobels

I wish the Nobel committee would change their rules to revoke Machado's award. Neither she nor Trump deserve it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 19 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So was this about the oil? Yesterday, he said russia's oil can be sold again. I'm guessing that's flying under the radar now.

“Frankly, to go get it—we’re going to go get it—but to go get it is a big deal, because they say only China and us have the equipment,” said the president. “You could make the case, ‘Why do you even bother?’ because it’s not very valuable, you know. It’s probably half a million dollars worth, it’s not very valuable stuff.”

As the Iran war upends energy flows, Russia is emerging as the real winner

Russia is shaping up to be a major beneficiary of the war between U.S.-Israel and Iran, as higher oil prices and temporary sanctions relief boost the value and volume of its crude exports, analysts told CNBC.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 14 points 21 hours ago

Russia seems to be the major beneficiary of everything that paedo does.

[–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

I'm so tired of this bs

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 5 points 17 hours ago

Huh. This may be the first time "Trump just says what everyone's thinking" has actually been true.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Already staggering incompetence, bewildering priorities, and a lack of emotional control, all severely exacerbated by dementia.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

so what did we (U.S.) get out of of this whole fiasco? Anything?

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 10 points 15 hours ago

3 months of reliable weekly pump-and-dumps? And by “we”, I mean Trump and friends.

[–] Triton420@mander.xyz 8 points 18 hours ago

A lot of debt

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Iran will have the best nukes! The most fantastic nuclear weapons! Frankly, no one sells out to Iran as bigly as Tr*mp.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

If Iran wants nukes, that’s fine. Israel has nukes and they aren’t giving them up. Iran having nukes would be an India-Pakistan situation with two opposing countries having nukes. They’ve kept that status quo for 60+ years.

Iran being a stable country infuriates Israel and the United States, but left alone it will modernize (in most ways it already has) and things will be fine.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

That’s really optimistic but ok.

[–] numbermess@fedia.io 8 points 20 hours ago

Winning!

-- Loser