this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
117 points (95.3% liked)

United Kingdom

6744 readers
478 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 5 points 2 hours ago

I had no idea who Young Bob was until a video of him in the front lines of the rioting in Southampton and then being interviewed by Owen Jones in Makerfield. He's certainly not a British Charlie Kirk: has zero charisma, couldn't understand Jones' (pretty basic) questions and struggled to articulate coherent answers. Jones had to continuously repeat and simplify his questioning and even then Young Bob couldn't comprehend. He's the big, loud-mouthed rightwinger who sits in Year 11 classes who won't stop giving his racist and misogynist views and everyone hates.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 4 hours ago

And just like Charlie Kirk I'd never heard of him until he got beaten up. If the media would just stop talking about these idiots they wouldn't be famous they'd just be random Twitter racists and we could all ignore them. But now the little dweeb has got a following.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 4 hours ago

‘If I were… ever able to have the opportunity to speak to Erika [Kirk], I would firstly give huge admiration towards her husband on the formula and ideas that I [drew] great inspiration from’.

He can save his breath, she's utterly ecstatic that her husband is dead.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 63 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Anyone who aspires to be like Charlie Kirk should enjoy the exact same ending as Charlie Kirk.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 hours ago

No, we are British. Stabbed and left to bleed out on the floor is more of our style.

Ha! Keeping the trash out of your streets

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

He got a well-deserved debeating.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Under a banner that read ‘Reform should be more radical’, he argued that subjects of the British Empire shouldn’t necessarily be welcome in the UK.

As a crowd gathered behind him, he said: ‘All of you who throw water are cowards. You don’t actually want to fight for what you believe in.’

. . . That was when he was kicked to the floor before his phone was smashed and his camera and banner were stolen.

. . . Eventually, a Black man he had been debating with steps in to protect him.

[–] FalcoLombardi1@lemmy.world 22 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

You missed the best quote from this little piss stain. "One responded: ‘I’ll fight you, b****’, before telling Moffitt to get a job. He said he had one, but was fired from McDonald’s for his political views."

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 hours ago

Fuck me, to get fired for your views at McDonald's you must have really been an obnoxious little cunt.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 4 hours ago

Having worked in McDonald's I can guarantee that he was actually fired for been lazy and difficult to work with. If you just do the job and don't mount off you can have whatever political view you want.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 16 points 9 hours ago

Right-wing politics is dominated by losers turned grifters.

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

I'm sure his mind was changed on some level...

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This rag is doing some heavy lifting for this piece of shit. I hope he sees the error of his ways or ceases to be able to vote or interact with anyone.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So is OP...

They quoted the shit stain saying the cops told him he was high profile.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 4 hours ago

The quote is Moffat telling the media that he says the police said that it's high profile. I highly doubt they did because it doesn't really make sense.

It can't be a high profile attack because no one knows who he is. Anyone who went to where he went, and said the things he said, would have got punched, his celebrity or lack thereof is it irrelevant.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

Counting or not counting hooligan violence?

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 hours ago

A rare British w

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago

This is the way.

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago

Is this the second time?

[–] meejle@piefed.world 1 points 9 hours ago

This really warmed my heart 🥲

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -3 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

I don't like these types any more than most sane people do, but I'm not really a fan of stooping to their level, either.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

But it's back to the arguement about the paradox of tolerance. If you don't beat these people they'll keep doing it. Given that they're calling for the lives of others to be destroyed inaction is not really an option.

Someone's going to suffer either way, might as well be the little skid mark that's causing the problem to begin with.

So I would love to know what your proposed solution is.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Considering he wants people's lives destroyed, I'd say beating his ass was a kindness. It's the closest thing to effective communication you can get with a Nazi without doing even worse to them.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yeah waiting it out and seeing them realize the error of their ways through slow social isolation has definitely happened and there definitely aren't any ramifications to letting themselves simply spew their hate speech out into the world.

Nothing bad ever happened to us when we stayed out of the mud, except for, you know, fucking everything, you asshat.

The next time someone you love is murdered and/or harassed because the murderer/harasser was inspired by a Charlie Kirk wannabe, remember to be the "bigger person" and don't stoop to their level. 🖕🏽

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 8 points 8 hours ago

The ~~anti‐Semite~~ fascist has chosen hate because hate is a faith; at the outset he has chosen to devaluate words and reasons. How entirely at ease he feels as a result. How futile and frivolous discussions about the rights of ~~the Jew~~ others appear to him. He has placed himself on other ground from the beginning. If out of courtesy he consents for a moment to defend his point of view, he lends himself but does not give himself. He tries simply to project his intuitive certainty onto the plane of discourse...

...Never believe that ~~anti‐ Semites~~ fascists are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The ~~anti‐Semites~~ fascists have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. It is not that they are afraid of being convinced. They fear only to appear ridiculous or to prejudice by their embarrassment their hope of winning over some third person to their side.

  • Jean-Paul Sartre

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Jean-Paul_Sartre

Fascists don't care about words or reasoning. They spread hate, discrimination, and lies and when challenged spout more lies to justify it. Even if presented with cold hard, unrefutable, facts.

When words, debate, and diplomacy can no longer prevent the calls to violence, the bigotry, the intolerance, then there is but one option; to speak the language they do understand.

The paradox of tolerance is a philosophical concept suggesting that if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant, it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance, thereby undermining the very principle of tolerance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

They didn't stoop to his level, he's a racist, fascist piece of shit. I'd say they were patient and kind, all things considered.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 hours ago

Then you're a part of the problem, namby-pamby fence sitters