this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
248 points (82.3% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3386 readers
650 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 25 minutes ago

It's fun trying to decide whether this is #bothSides-ism or just lack of awareness of how evolution works. "It's pointless to push for better because while one's less imperfect they're both still imperfect" just seems like the footshot of harm reduction.

It scores really well precisely because the conservative cult, built on blind loyalty to the Team, just does not care about this stuff, and the dem refugees are constantly re-evaluating for purity and will lap this up to feed their angst. It could only be less transparent if it was posted originally from GMT+3

They vote to fund ICE, Biden did nothing to release the Epstein files or go after obvious sedition in the name of bipartisanship. His SAVE act was desperately needed after he signed into law the inability to discharge overwhelming amounts of student debt in bankruptcy. He has personally voted to increase police funding. Obama started putting kids in cages and continued the funding of ICE. There's more but that's what's just on the surface of what I remember right now.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago
[–] RichardCO@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago

Only about 20% of eligible voters vote in the primaries. If we want candidates that will fight for our interests, we need to do more than simply voting Democrat in the general elections.

I’ve been using the following sites to find candidates that aren’t taking AIPAC money and are focused on supporting the working class:

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Youre right i guess we should all just start voting for more republicans. Maybe well get jd vance mext. Maybe hegseth wants to take a shot. Since theyre all the same anyways. Maybe patel or noeme then she can shoot dogs all day and itll be totally fine. Or better yet just stop voting all together. Who needs all that noise. Just let them do whatever amd we can go back to being serfs

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Republicans certainly go the extra mile though.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Because democrats enable them.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Democrats drive the truck. Republicans man the water canon.

[–] liking625@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

It is the same story in lots of countries now, with the pretend to be left (but center-right) party you go down and with the ultra right wing you go down quickly and on wheels

[–] ThisUsernameKillsFascists@piefed.social 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

While I won’t argue that this has often been the role of the Democratic Party, and I have no doubt that it is a priority of the current party leadership, it is not an inherent function of the party. With our current electoral system, it is inevitable that our politics will be dominated by two parties. Republicans are the worse choice of the two on literally every single issue, including being less open than Democrats to changes to the electoral system itself. The solution, as leftists, is not to abandon the Democratic Party, but rather to take it over from within and elect party leadership focused on real change and not upholding the status quo. This approach is much more feasible and potentially much faster than trying to build a new party from the ground up, and much less destructive and painful for the people than violent revolution and the civil war that would likely ensue.

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

How do we the people create any true influence over the DNC? Aren't they like the final approver for a democratic presidential candidate? And the DNC board isn't elected by the people as far as I know. How could we ever have a true leftist democratic party if the DNC is running things?

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

They argued, and won in court, that they are a private corporation and voters are not entitled to fair elections and they are under no obligation to listen to the will of the voters regarding the candidates they select to win the nomination of their party

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

Just like in New York City. Get good candidates and elect them in the primaries.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My spouse is watching The Good Place, and just got to the end of season 3. There's a scene where one character is explaining to a council of people from heaven that life is so complex nowadays that nobody can get into heaven, and for the last 500 years not a single person can get into heaven.

The council then says they're going to spend 400 years forming a committee, and then that committee will spend 1000 years forming its own investigative committee to make sure there's no conflict of interest, THEN they'll investigate the system to see if there's a problem.

The first character then exclaims that I those 1400 years before the investigation even starts people will still be going to hell regardless of how good they tried to be.

The committee then states they are "deeply concerned" by that, which got me to start cackling.

The committee sums up my view of democrats.

Even if they are concerned by the daily atrocities and banality of evil, they're too concerned about doing things "by the book" and too concerned with the status quo changing that they are basically doing nothing. They might think they're acting swiftly, but the whole time all the people suffering are continuing to suffer.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Even if they are concerned by the daily atrocities and banality of evil

You must not be American. Right now all branches of the Federal Government and the majority of states' governments are Republican. Democrats have absolutely no power to do anything but talk.

The US isn't a European style parliament where minority parties have some power.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 12 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

You're right that Democrats are near-powerless right now, but it was only a few short years ago when they were in power. Let's not forget their actions.

When in power, they did not concern themselves with the daily atrocities or the banality of evil.

Their overwhelming support for the genocide in Palestine is just the tip of the banality iceberg.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Republicans spend a decade gaining supermajorities in state legislatures and packing the judiciary with republican judges.

Democrats spent a decade celebrating Hillary Clinton's imminent election.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 18 minutes ago)

Ask Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema if Democrats were really "in power." Republicans have been willing to shred the Constitution in order to get what they want, but it works primarily because they operate virtually in lock step with one another, even if they sometimes allow one member or another to vote No on some horrifying bill or another, so long as that No vote won't change the end result.

Democrats have the opposite problem: in recent memory they've only ever had the narrowest of majorities in Congress, and they're a bunch of cats on a good day, so there's always a few Democrats in vulnerable seats that will break with the party in order to maintain their "outsider" image with their purple district voters. Add on that Democrats for the most part don't want to shred the Constitution, and it's very difficult for them to achieve their goals.

And add on that most media in this country is owned and operated by billionaires and it constantly pushes the narrative that anything to the left of Ronald Reagan is basically Karl Marx, and you've got an electorate that is on balance very suspicious of things that, to a reasonable person, would obviously make the world a better place, like universal healthcare, free pre-K education, police reform, immigration reform, and so on.

The Democrats that do want to make the world a better place are essentially trying to play honest baseball with unreliable teammates, shitty coaches and managers, opponents who are 'roided out of their minds, and umpires who won't call objective balls and strikes. Even for the ones who are trying to improve things (and they do exist!) it's an appalling situation.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Student loan forgiveness? Replacing Coal with Solar? Expanded ACA?

All gone under Trump. But both sides bad.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

I am American, and i am getting very tired of hearing "they CAN'T do things because they have to play by the rules!"

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

As long as we have this broken first-past-the-post electoral system, I will vote blue, no matter what. When we have something better (proportional representation, for example), I will entertain more nuanced parties. Until then, at least the D leaders haven't actively dismantled democracy.

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world -3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

So you want everyone else to do the work and when that job is finished you will hop on our bandwagon and proclaim you always supported us?

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

You can be working towards voter reform and be voting for Democrats at the same time. They aren't mutually exclusive.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago

It's not "hopping on the bandwagon", with the way your election system is rigged, there are only two options for a lot of places, anything else is a wasted vote

If you got rid of the Electoral Colleges and the FPP then suddenly it's not a wasted vote

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think that’s a big reason many Americans don’t vote. It’s not really a choice, just the perception of a choice and the spectacle of a contest.

[–] chisel@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Democrats are far from perfect, but the gulf between Democrats and Republicans is immense and the false "both sides" rhetoric is tiring and a big reason why we're in this mess.

Do you think we'd have war in Iran, no USAID, and dismantled regulatory agencies if Kamala had won the last election? There is a choice.

[–] WYLD_STALLYNS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 22 hours ago

The choice was almost always, come to choose the lesser of two evils. Unfortunately people think by not voting it will somehow make a difference, when in reality it just shows that people give up when it’s too hard and expect someone else to fix it. The first basic step is always to keep the boulder from rolling further downhill by voting to prevent more decline. Given enough time, change can happen, you just have to realize it’s incredibly slow moving like evolution and requires more of us at the top instead of sitting on our hands and letting social influence turds fill the offices.
It isn’t like this can’t be retaken, it just requires more than one person taking office.

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, I’ll agree with you in general, but I would also say that both sides are generally working for billionaires and operate generally as neoliberal parties. Biden even proudly confessed his capitalist convictions.

I don’t disagree that if this last election had gone differently we’d be in a different probably better position, but I also don’t think we have universal healthcare. Plenty more nuance to that than will fit in a comments section, but yes I agree but there’s a lot more to it and people hear democratic promises but don’t often see democratic action.

But also at this point it’s becoming less two neoliberal parties and more the neoliberal party and the fascist party, so yes I’ll 100% take the neoliberal over the fascist.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

Neoliberals are fascist

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

You are literally advocating for US imperialism in your BS reply

[–] FearfulSalad@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, BUT, it's easier to infiltrate them with the people's politicians than it is the other side. If the people stop being idiots and stop voting for the Right, which doesn't even have the veneer of their interests on their policies, and only vote dem irrespective of how duplicitous they are, then the dem block can be broken up into middle managers vs actual leftists, and the overton window can start shifting back the other way, many years from now.

If your voting options are for Fiery Pits of Hell vs Endless Limbo, you vote Endless Limbo no matter how far from Heaven it happens to be right now.

And yeah, go and do things that might change the system. Just remember that not voting is not abstention: it's complicity in electing the Fiery Pits of Hell, by design.

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world -2 points 14 hours ago

Reform is a path to failure

[–] chisel@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Ok, I will abstain and allow the mass murdering child rapists to run the country instead!

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

That what liberals did by allowing a Trump win the first and second time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago

I would describe it as both sides are beholden to capitalistic influence, just in different ways.

There is no "this is the reason our party exists" conspiracy.

load more comments
view more: next ›