A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
I mean, it should be if you break it (within accepted gauge tolerance) you should lose the right to drive. No grace given. People will learn quickly to obey the limits. Easy.
That 100mph fine seems worth it
I can go 4x the speed for only 2.5x the fine
That's a deal
But seriously. We'll do anything to not build slower streets.
That fine is so insubstantial it's more like a ticket to ride.
$500 for 100mph is probably cheaper than going to a track day... (after accounting for the probability of enforcement)
Reminds me of signs in Oregon “No littering, $500 maximum fine"
Like why the fuck would you put the max when it's low? Talk about a Cobra Effect..but that's the point, it's not desired to be effective, might inadvertently make driving slightly less appealing and cut some infinitesimal slice of big oils profits to be able to cross the street safely.
Isn't 16mph 11mph+? And isn't 26mph also 11mph+?