this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
141 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

85615 readers
3286 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 minutes ago

If a human courier walked at me and wanted to go through me, I'm allowed to push them away. A robot doesn't have more rights than a person. Not likely to happen to me with a robto where I live though.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What law would I potentially break if I tipped one over?

I've never seen one IRL where I live, they wouldn't make much sense in suburbia, but I suppose I might come across one someday, if they keep multiplying.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Probably property damage. Same as if you stomped a kid's radio controlled car.

[–] Dalraz@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What is you just put a cup over its lidar sensor.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Or put a traffic cone in front and behind it? Definitely don't do that though, it's possibly illegal.

[–] michaelalf@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You don't have to damage it though... Just gently roll it on it's side for a little nap.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 50 minutes ago

I think the company could still likely chase people who do that for damages if something broke or for lost profit since it would be pretty clear that it was intentionally disabled/intended to stop its function so it would be pretty clear in a civil court that there was tortious intent.

I wouldn't personally recommend doing it on these, they are essentially walking cameras.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 10 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

To be fair, the delivery robots I've seen (made by Yandex, which is known for bleeding-edge developments in self-driving technology) made good job to be as unobtrusive and predictable as possible, while also avoiding humans in quite a large range.

My only issue with them is that these are camera-equipped devices rolling the streets and likely sending all that footage to their Big Tech daddies. Besides that, they do their job well, reducing the need for hard human labor.

[–] YabbaDabbaDipshit@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure the people who were surviving off that hard human labor are thrilled

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

I’m surprised that those who lost the work aren’t administers or some beneficiary of it. UBI seems to be the way??

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

If you see one chuck it in the river

[–] toebert@piefed.social 3 points 7 hours ago

This may provide the first actual usecase for SUVs in cities. They seem to be about as tall as a child, so presumably invisible for the suv drivers.

Hopefully the robots will get mowed down when trying to cross the street.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck you botly, I'm going clankertipping

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

"THAT'S CALLED CLANKTIPPING! HA HA!"

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 46 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

A lot of sidewalks in major cities don't have room for these. Especially if you account for traffic, light, and power poles, street signs, bus and trolley stops, subway and El entrances, sidewalk trees, garbage, trash and recycling bins, sidewalk grates, cellar entries, cracked sidewalks, etc, etc, etc. And suddenly you're being asked to give up one piece of space that's supposedly reserved for you, to yet another 'move fast, break things, get permission later' techbro "innovation" that no one's asked for.

There's no regulation over them, no standards that they have to follow or how to behave, no way for the public to specifically identify a robot when they encounter it in public (like, say, your robot ran into my car or whatever).

I'd only allow them if each robot carried a certain amount of insurance, was registered and had some kind of license plate, had turn signals (I don't know if they do, the ones I saw didn't), had limited operating hours and locations, were forced to move aside for humans, etc - basically make them the absolute lowest priority thing on the streets and sidewalks. Streets, bike lanes, sidewalks, subways, etc, were each built for specific forms of human movement. If techbros want to introduce a new type of system, they should be forced to build their own infrastructure to support it (no idea what that looks like for delivery robots), instead of just blatantly overloading already-stressed public infrastructure.

[–] SMillerNL@piefed.social 4 points 10 hours ago

A lot of sidewalks in major cities don't have room for these. Especially if you account for traffic, light, and power poles, street signs, bus and trolley stops, subway and El entrances, sidewalk trees, garbage, trash and recycling bins, sidewalk grates, cellar entries, cracked sidewalks, etc, etc, etc.

That’s pretty awful because it seems to me they take about the same space as a wheelchair.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 2 points 9 hours ago

Hopefully this forces tech companies to discuss with the government regarding the increase in walking space and reduction of car traffic in inhabited areas.

[–] 123@programming.dev 5 points 11 hours ago

It would be somewhat ironic if actual side walks were implemented to support these things on those affluent car dependent neighborhoods and people discovered cars should not be the focus when designing roads.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

they should be forced to build their own infrastructure to support it (no idea what that looks like for delivery robots)

Tunnels, at least in heavily populated areas. They already make pipes that should be big enough. It might require a slight redesign of the bots so that they can "climb the wall" a short distance to pass each other, and maybe extend/retract some bits depending on whether they're inside or out, but my heart would not exactly bleed over the money spent. And they'd be out of sight, out of mind most of the time for the rest of us.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If they are going to put in tunnels, they may as well just put in a pneumatic tube system so the robots wouldn't be needed.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

and that'll be a lot cleaner. I won't be ordering my food from things running in open tunnels of big cities, they'll be smelling of piss within a day

But my food might not arrive hot if all this is in place…

/s

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 57 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

If one of these bumped into me I feel like I'd want to tip it over in response.

[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

I wouldn’t just feel it, it would be on its side.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 18 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Welcome to the Resistance. Simple steps like this are the right response.

TBH I think I’m at the rebellious point of do it without it bumping into me. Steal it’s cargo and dump it somewhere.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Saw a video of one of these things at an intersection asking a pedestrian to hit the walk button for it. He just laughed and said nope. I bet a real person could hit the button.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The thing is it it was an overall fair system most people would get along with the machines. But capitalists and ‘leaders’ have started to make us hate it.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

These must be pretty haltable tbh. Either by covering the lidar and I am guessing there will be a safety stop button somewhere. What happens then can the be force rebooted?

And how do they cross the road can the be fooled? Are they crossing after a sound occurs or is it a can see them being gps.

It’s gonna take bunches of us rounding them up like sheep and hearding them towards a locked field.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 3 points 4 hours ago

They'll have cameras and gps though. So be careful, the cops might protect it more than humans. Catch it in a faraday cage maybe.

[–] teft@piefed.social 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They seem portable enough to lug to a river which is exactly where it would go if one hit me or anyone i was with.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 3 hours ago

Just don’t leave it there though, the world is already so polluted.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

This is just one of many, many pieces of technology that have been just put into public from tech companies whether we like it or now. And they do it because they know there is no regulation, nor will there be anytime soon to reign it in.

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 23 points 16 hours ago

"broken-down robots causing obstructions"

It's littering. Call the sanitation department.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 36 points 18 hours ago

No wonder. The roads are not built for these things and nobody expects them there.

[–] Jackusflackus@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

Kick the fucking things into the street

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not really bothered by these things. I walk around them just like I have to walk around humans and their detritus.

[–] SouthEndSunset@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Might not be that easy if you’re disabled, elderly, blind, or just not looking.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago

Seriously. Already annoyed enough at cyclists coming from behind who refuse to slow down and assume you can hear their stupid high pitch bells (not if you have hearing loss).

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 5 points 16 hours ago

Every day Bender seems more and more realistic.