this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
1391 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11697 readers
1306 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] someone@lemmy.today 17 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

You know what would help this situation?

AI

Lots and lots of AI.

Also more religion.

[โ€“] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Isn't Ai a religion already ? ๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 hours ago

More religion? So just all, okay...guess the "life in balance with nature"-type of religions are also evil and protecting nature is cutting down trees

[โ€“] MisterD@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 hours ago

Don't forget more Trillionaires

[โ€“] fox2263@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Do you reckon the USA actions in the last 2 years have contributed to the speed up?

[โ€“] glitch1985@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who doesn't know much of anything about this topic could you elaborate on what actions the US has taken? I am genuinely curious.

[โ€“] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Removal of subsidies for EVs, launching rockets for space garbage every 5 seconds, and bombing everything. I'm sure hitting the gas/fuel plant with missiles was especially great for greenhouse gases.

[โ€“] glitch1985@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Makes sense, thank you.

[โ€“] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 hours ago

Defenetly but its not the only thing

[โ€“] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 21 points 15 hours ago

Climate change deniers: "I'll be dead by 2050, why do I care?" or "Fuck you, I got mine already."

Reality: FAFO.

[โ€“] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 34 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

There's been a 73% decline in global vertebrate populations since 1970. We're in the beginning of a very serious mass extinction and it's kinda like we don't care which is interesting.

[โ€“] omarfw@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago

Sociopathic billionaires with all of the power to do something about it absolutely don't care if the world ends. They only care if they were on top before the game ended.

[โ€“] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That's because a lot of money is being spent to keep us oblivious about it.

[โ€“] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Not saying you're wrong but I don't see the point in letting the population collapse. It will just bounce back later and probably be far greater assuming humans don't go extinct before achieving sufficient space travel and colonies. That is also assuming we're the only ones here and this isn't like a controlled demolition of the human species by some other entity or force.

[โ€“] andicraft@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

people can really just say anything they want on the internet huh?

[โ€“] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

I haven't even ruled out last Thursdayism. Reality is strange, even in the most mundane interpretation.

[โ€“] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

no no you don't understand, the billionaires want more money, the number simply must go up. and maybe they would care about the world if any of their workers would inform them of the consequences of each of their actions, but none that do stick around so the number keeps going up, fuck the consequences

[โ€“] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Possible but they're holding summits trying to figure out how to maintain control in their bunkers when money no longer has value. I think they're pretty aware of the situation at hand.

[โ€“] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

yeah but you just said it, they feel safe with their bunkers, the rest of the world be damned

[โ€“] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Safe until there's a revolt and they become the bunker bitch or in a worse case tomorrow's dinner. You see the issue? Can't control people with money if money no longer has value.

[โ€“] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well that's because we are the mass extinction event.

[โ€“] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yup, second organism to cause a mass extinction but the first to self proclaim it's intelligent.

[โ€“] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The curse of interesting times strikes again.

[โ€“] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm still pretty solid on the idea we're in an ancestor simulation or at minimum definitely not in base reality.

[โ€“] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Whatever helps get you through it. Functionally it makes no difference. The simulation runs particles smaller than atoms and the maximum speed is still light. Our universe is too vast for us to explore and there's probably other life forms on planets too far away to matter. Our experience is insignificant in the grand scheme of things, yet the only thing we will ever do. Make it count while you're here.

[โ€“] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I mean the probability isn't in our favor. As for us, yeah it doesn't change much. Same for a lot of epistemological arguments. Last Thursdayism, Descartes demon, Plato's cave, Chung Tzu's butterfly, solipsism, Boltzmann brains could all be bang on right on the money. I see you're taking the more so physical reality approach, even then if something like the holographic universe or some variation is correct then maybe distance doesn't exist like we think it does. If for instance we're in a black hole then there's a one to one representation of all information here in what we consider 3D space on the black hole's surface.

All the fun ideas aside I agree with you although maybe our definitions of fun may be different. That is I think the first goal is to reduce needless and avoidable suffering for all minds anywhere in existence whenever possible. Like even if it is a simulation of sorts or reality just started ten seconds ago or what I'm experiencing is a Boltzmann brain it still doesn't stop the first goal from at least being the best goal I've found so far.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Faster than expected, and worse than anticipated. It will get much faster and much worse. Practice growing your own food and stay in shape.

[โ€“] hamid@crazypeople.online 10 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Actually, in line with what was actually anticipated and taught in science classes in 2000. People decided to go with the best case scenarios as if global emissions would go down for some reason. No one who has been paying attention should be surprised.

[โ€“] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

Yeah limits to growth I think was in the 70s. Seems pretty accurate so far.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Every time the IPCC publishes a report it's like: oh yeah may have gone way past the most pessimistic option this year, yet again, for the seventh time in a row, so here's a new set of predictions that will surely not be overly optimistic this time round.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] super_user_do@feddit.it 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Idk how to convince people anymore. I am tired and sad

[โ€“] pseudo@jlai.lu 1 points 2 hours ago

That's the hit.
Drink lots of water and try to di most of your errants and activity by night or early morning when temperatures are at the coolest.

[โ€“] Cattail@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

Oh good we are ahead of schedule

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ