this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
357 points (98.1% liked)

Funny

15405 readers
520 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Game. Map for the game. Background video/music/audio book. btop. Fastfetch x 8

[–] WagnasT@piefed.world 83 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I was idly wiggling my mouse while wating for a download and the cursor got HUGE. I didn't know KDE even had such a feature.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 61 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I have the banana cursor and I amuse myself daily by making my banana big banana

It's just so damn amusing

Link for the magnificent banana cursor: https://store.kde.org/p/1931412/

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Nobody thinks of the banana for scale? How do we do now?

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Someone should make a penis cursor. That would be double amusing.

I doubt it doesn't exist already

[–] mountaincalledmonkey@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love this feature in kde, if only just to amuse

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 7 points 2 days ago

My use case (other than amusement) is to point out something on the screen to my girlfriend who is on the other side of the room. Wiggle the mouse for a bit until it's big and then circle the thing needing focus lol

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago

This has been a thing in MacOS for years, and it always felt so simple and... obvious? Well, it seems, finally someone else has implemented it

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah i disabled it cuz I always wiggle and it was distracting me too much lmao

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe 29 points 2 days ago (4 children)

KDE has this feature that if you keep wiggling the cursor fast enough it gets as big as the screen, which would be useful in this situation

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

that's a neat way, as it is very intuitive. one always wiggles the mouse to search for the cursor :) at some point i had a shortcut for that, but would always forget about its existence

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So that's why my cursor randomly gets huge...

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can double-click Ctrl on Windows 11

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Lost your cursor? That's okay, just use your mouse to double-click the Ctrl key on your keyboard and you'll find it!"

(Not what you meant of course but accidentally sounded too much like an AI slop answer, fitting for Windows 11)

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lmao. What verb do you use when pressing a key twice then? "Double-press" sounds weird, doesn't it?

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Double tap.

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Accidently pressed prtscn and roasted their RAM.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Windows: install power tools then double tap ctrl.

Linux: search "locate pointer" a lot of desktop environments support this natively, or you can extend it power tools style. On GNOME ctrl should also highlight the cursor.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

On KDE you just shake it

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago

Hell, Windows has had the locate cursor option natively since like XP I think.

I've had to turn it off forever since I'm a bit spastic on the keyboard, haha

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Nah. I'm just going to ⬆️🔄🔃↪️↖️↘️↩️➡️↘️🖱️↙️⤴️⬇️↩️⬆️⬇️⬅️↗️🔃🔄

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

Furiously pressing ctrl

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can anyone tell what kind of work he's actually using those for? The image is a little too potato for me to make much out.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We have rooms like this where i work. Theyre for live monitoring jet engine tests so we can monitor 1000+ pieces of instrumention to make sure the engines running safe.

That said, that floor looks too nice to be in our kind of facility. But i imagine hes got to be monitoring something in live time. Each screen is probably dedicated to a sub-system so he knows if something turns yellow or red, he immediately knows what system it is, whats going on, and can call the test back to a "safe operation"

[–] christopher@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So how the heck do you use a mouse with that many screens?

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Youre usually not actively using the mouse. You set up each window/module individually, on a normal set up, then when you get into a control room, you load them individually and fit them to a monitor to just look at. Theres probably 1 or 2 monitors that hes actively using. I see no actual test control equipment in the picture, so they likely have some communication method to the people with the actual controls.

Like for example, if this guys monitoring oil systems, hell be checking levels, pressure, temperature and all things bearings, hes likely got an entire set up to monitoring just the oil tanks, one for oil flows at different locations in the circuit, specific temperaute locations so that he knows if he has risk of ignition, those kind of things. If he notice oil tank levels getting low, he'll call for more oil. Someone else has the job of controlling the valves and refilling the oil. If it goes on too long, he can call out he suspects an oil leak, which could lead to a different operator throttling back on the engine, or even turning it off. If he sees that his bearing is over/under loaded, he can call for a different person running an air system or a completely different person running a gear box to load/unload the bearings.

If theyre not all in the same room, theyre usually on phones, walkie talkies, or instant messenger

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You.. move it? And.. click?

[–] muzzle@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Many control rooms require you to keep an eye on a lot of things at the same time and have similar setups

[–] subOrange@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

What kind of hardware do you need to run 15 screens?

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Four GPU's with four outputs each would do it.

You'd only need a main board with for x16 physical slots as PCIe x4 would be sufficient bandwidth for desktops.

You're also not pushing the GPU's power envelope, so one beefy or two smaller PSU's would suffice. The AMD WX7000 series workstation cards don't even have the extra PCIe power connectors (last time I looked).

I suspect these are more likely to be two or more machines though.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago

Matrox makes some crazy multi-monitor GPUs that could do this without needing as many cards.

Here's their 8-display version:

The main limitation here is number of monitor ports.

Applications that use this many screens aren't running a high level of graphics. Even a bunch of camera feeds aren't going to strain the GPU.

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

AMD GPUs used to be really good at this. Not sure how well it works nowadays, with generally higher resolutions and thus higher bandwidth requirements. I'd imagine it involves a lot of trial and error with displayport chaining.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Matrox cats are even better. 8 displays per card.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

TIL Matrox still exists. I think I used to have one of their cards in the 90s, but I don't remember which.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A modern computer can easily fit 4 low-end GPUs plus the onboard one. Most things that used the slots are onboard the motherboard or USB now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Just eliminate a few of them monitors, then it's much easier.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The cursor problem seems like it wouldn't be there with a tiling wm.

[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's because with tiling vm you don't need multiple monitors 😀

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My current role gave me an ultra wide and a second monitor mounted vertically

Almost immediately turned off the second monitor, and the ultrawide I maintain my terminal in a more standard widescreen area

I really hate distractions outside my field of view

load more comments
view more: next ›