this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
178 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30208 readers
2200 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I have a bad feeling if goes through it will be extremely easily bypassable like every other tax the ultrawealthy are supposed to be paying

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

As a non-billionaire and closer to a negative-aire who has owned registered business entities costing $150...

...taxes on entity profits are super easy to bypass. Stupid easy. So I have zero confidence this will ultimately do much of anything, but I hope it maybe moves the needle slightly.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

“oh m’god , being taxed at the same rate as the commoners…WHERE’S MY GREY POUPON??!!”

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Not even close to the same rate.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

You probably find this exact comment on both sides of the dollar.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 30 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

The proposed tax measure, which would require billionaires to pay a one-time tax equal to 5% of their net worth

Is one time even a tax? Why not recurring

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Make it 1% and make it yearly.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Make it 10, make it yearly, and make examples of a couple of them in advance.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

You're not thinking about the headlines. This looks like a war chest.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Recurring would be nice, but they would move away immediately.
We need to have international regulation that set a minimum wealth tax, so the billionaires can't escape it.
Until then it has to be modest like 0.5% to have a chance to work.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 3 hours ago

Citation needed.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 19 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

People always say this, but I haven't seen it play out that way. That was the narrative for NY before Mamdani won as well. It was claimed the wealthy would all flee the city. And then it didn't happen. It just seems stupid that we keep defeating ourselves before we even attempt it.

Just pass actual taxes on the wealthy. If they flee, then oh well. What is anyone losing? They already weren't paying taxes. They are parasites. If parasites leave, that doesn't seem like a loss.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

That was the narrative in Ma before the extra tax on income above $2M and it ended up raising even more money than predicted.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

They won't move, this is where they make their money. They need us more than we need them

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 6 hours ago

Right? Where are they going to go? You can't take your real estate with you. You can't pick up culture and move it.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 5 hours ago

do move on you indolent scum!

[–] bl4ckp1xx13@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

If anyone needed any more evidence that this class is totally outright malicious, know that many of them have already spent more money trying to fight this "tax" than the "tax" would've cost them.

They are literally just fucking over the working class for the love of the game.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Well yeah, it's much easier to get more work out of us for cheap when we are living hand to mouth

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 5 hours ago

reparations for the working class now!

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 10 points 10 hours ago

Give me my money back. Give me my money back, you bitch! I want my money back. And don't forget to give my back my black t-shirt!

[–] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Xavier Becerra already said he wouldn't sign it...

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

How does that matter for this ballot proposition?

EDIT: He‘s on record in opposition but there is no executive veto possibility. In other words if it passes it doesn’t need anyone’s signature to go into effect.