this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
400 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

85870 readers
4448 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1230279/us-house-passes-the-kids-internet-and-digital-safety-kids-act-which-would-basically-requ

Full Bill Text.

This bill requires specified online platforms to establish safeguards for minors. The safeguards include (1) limiting access to specified sexual material, (2) providing parental controls on social media and online video game platforms, and (3) requiring artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots to disclose certain information to users who are minors.

First, publicly available online platforms on which more than one-third of the content is considered sexual material harmful to minors under the bill must adopt technology to identify minors and prevent them from accessing such material.

Next, social media platforms must (1) implement default settings for minors that limit compulsive usage features and the ability of other users to communicate with minors, and (2) provide tools for parents to manage the privacy and account settings of a minor. Social media platforms may not allow ephemeral messaging features for minors.

The bill also requires online video game platforms to provide tools that allow parents to (1) limit communication between a minor and other users of the platform, and (2) restrict purchases by a minor on the platform.

Further, providers of AI chatbots must disclose to users who are minors (1) that the chatbot is an AI system and not a human, and (2) suicide and crisis intervention hotline information.

Finally, the bill requires specified studies and reports about the effects of social media platforms on minors and provides for enforcement of the bill's requirements by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Situation is shit now, but I really love that people made spaces such as this one - small, and calm, without too much (of course they are) normies looking around. Hell, the best defensive mechanism against normies appears to be "pick your server" question when registering.

And looking forward, internet will pop and transform thanks to such small spaces that will emerge out of nowhere, against the stupid laws and censorship, even if access will be limited it will work as sifting for low-efforders.

I love it. Now it's time to take my meds and go to bed. πŸ‘΄

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

Fortunately thanks to VPNs I'm Canadian. I can just keep changing the settings the more and more countries implement dumb laws.

Now I'm sure some politicians have come up with a bright idea of banning VPNs and I'm just looking forward to the drama when that idea is tabled.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 18 points 15 hours ago

This will be a kiss of death for every site that enacts it

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Obviously, I hate it, but

specified online platforms

that's a lot more weaksauce than I was expecting. I guess these old fossils don't know that there are websites based in other countries

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago) (1 children)

I would highly recommend actually reading the full text of the bill. It is a lot more than what is in the body of the post.

It is not clear to me whether a site would need to be hosted in the US to fall under this law or if they would just need to be accessible in the US.

I would post the definitions but there are 7 titles under this law and 5 of them each have their own definition.

Edit: just to be clear. I hate this law too. ID requirements will kill many platforms or people will use vpns to circumvent.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

Why would someone from another country follow U.S. law. Not their problem.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 24 points 17 hours ago

This is such bullshit. If they really cared about the well-being of children, they'd make sure they had free healthcare, free daycare, and free college/trade school.

This is ONLY about connecting our identities with our online activity. They just put a bunch of people in prison for DECADES for possessing writings that were "anti-government," so that allowed them to be classified as ANTIFA terrorists. This will allow them to do that with ANYONE who posts something they don't like.

Just because these parasites claim to have a righteous rationalization for this, doesn't mean we have to accept it. We KNOW they are lying, and the real reason is to control the adults of this country, not the children.

A lifetime of invasive surveillance is far more damaging to society, than kids discovering that men and women have different genitalia.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 21 points 17 hours ago

This is one of those deals where the ALL fall in line from both parties. That's when you know the Big Fix is in. The Sociopathic Oligarchs demanded this because it not only makes them mind-boggling wealth, but it also allows them to kill those who are causing them trouble.

And the people we elected to protect us, sold us out - nearly all of them.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

I’m tired man

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 80 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

If they actually cared about kids, the Epstein files would have been released ages ago with no redactions. No politician cares about you or your kids.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You don't get it. This is to know who is underage and where they live. No one said Epstein's death was the end of their pedo business.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I'd be surprised if it was. The man was a symptom, not the root cause of the problem, and he certainly didn't do it all by himself.

He was the stereotypical man in the underworld who could get you anything, as long as you could afford the price.

Others would almost certainly have filled in the gap he left by now.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

Ehm. He was a Mossad agent collecting blackmail material on highly influential people. He just went for the sector his targets are most interested in.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago

the list of "if they actually cared about kids, they would have/should have done X" is so long you could probably print it out at an 8 point font and it'd still reach from coast to coast across the width of america.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 45 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

It's worth noting that this isn't a distraction, this is the main event.

[–] AverageEarthling@feddit.online 164 points 1 day ago (6 children)

yeah, good luck with that. I'll just go read a book under a tree at that point. The internet can just be a bunch of bots shitposting to each other. The day I have to have ID to use the internet is the day I log off for good.

[–] Zulu@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Its been over a decade since i last sat in a hammock and read a book. Kinda excited for the internet to die now tbh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The reason they want age verification isn’t to protect the kids. It’s to verify the entity making a request is a real person and not a bot so they can charge more for the ad space.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also to track what everyone does on the internet so it can be used against them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agentTeiko@piefed.social 20 points 1 day ago

Yep why do you think Facebook is behind most of these bills.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is only for the clearnet, the darknets don't have this. Maybe most people will go to darknets. Of course due to being unregulated it has all kinds of disturbing stuff.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 2 points 15 hours ago

the darknets don’t have this.

  • ...Yet. Surely that's the next destruction target, though.
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 135 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We're going to PROTECT the CHILDREN by ~~PROSECUTING Jeffrey Epstein's CO Conspirators!~~ GIVING Jeffrey Epstein's CO Conspirators ACCESS to your Children!

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago

Now they don't have to wait for you to put your daughter into modeling or beauty contest. They can access her right through your Wi-Fi.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Never about protecting children about fighting privacy and making data collection easier.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago

They’re preparing for civil unrest.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Most Americans will accept deep surveillance and the arrests that will follow, without complaints. "Nothing To Hide, Nothing To Fear"

[–] SouthEndSunset@piefed.blahaj.zone 95 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember, it’s not about the kids.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It never was. But repubs certainly can't stop thinking about them.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

There's a lot of blue seats in that image too

They are all about freedom and small gov until they are in power.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

My Democratic house member (who ran unopposed in his last two primaries) voted for the KIDS acts. I am so glad I get to vote for him this year in the general election. I love living in my very healthy and functional democracy.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Surprised to see Hirono on there, thats disappointing. But Schumer, Slotkin, Fetterman, Kloubachar, Whitehouse, Warner .. the usual band of traitorous republican-lite DNC idiots is no big surprise. Thanks for the link.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Welcome back, SOPA. We didn't miss you. In fact, SOPA should've been actually dead instead of waiting to resurface for 14 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

internet was fun while it lasted; new internet is ass anyway

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 19 points 1 day ago

Should we just share memes and titties outside since the normies moved online and fucked it up?

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This title may be cited as the Shielding Children’s Retinas from Egregious Exposure on the Net Act or the SCREEN Act.

Oh wow, they really love their acronyms!

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Or the 'Killing Internet Dissent and Speech' Act. KOSA is the 'Killing Online Speech Act.'

[–] stermy4u@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I think, this is a nice move, but thinking maybe there are other important matters that needs to be addressed first before this

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 23 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I wonder if it'll ever be feasible to do some kind of mass, federated mesh networking to cut out the ISPs altogether.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί