Do it you coward.
(He won't do it)
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
43 points (97.8% liked)
politics
30286 readers
2259 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
What the libs celebrating this don't understand is that a third party doesn't have to be treated with complete hostility. Tucker's party could very well wind up endorsing a Republican candidate, in exchange for that candidate giving them some policy concessions (or bribing them with dark money and/or cabinet positions, of course). This is how third parties can wield the threat of being a spoiler as leverage to get policy they want, and why a right-wing third party isn't automatically advantageous to the Democrats.
What he's probably gonna do is to champion whatever wedge issue is in the zeitgeist that neither major party is responding to at all (a given), and he's going to get the Republicans to give him a small, symbolic, and ultimately meaningless concession on that point, which will lead people concerned about that issue into the Republican party.
If the Democrats were capable of viewing the left with anything short of outright contempt and hostility for daring to question their absolute authority, if they actually responded to democratic pressure from below instead of plugging their ears and giving us nothing but tear gas, then maybe we wouldn't be in the situation we're in now, and maybe we wouldn't have to worry as much about that happening in the future. But it's a given that people will be more frustrated than ever with the duoparty in the next election and it's also a given that the Democrats will absolutely refuse to budge or adapt at all, and so there's plenty of room for Tucker to sweep up voters by actually engaging with their concerns (dishonestly of course).
Please, please, please siphon off many, many conservatives from the Republican Party and sap all of their power. I'd love to see the New Whigs battle the Old Whigs while the Democratic Party takes all the wins...
Yeaaah but the Dems would see this as an easy win and so wouldn't have any incentive to change.
As opposed to all the incentive to change they have right now while losing to the worst iteration of the Republican party of the last century?
Well, there have been a few signs in the recent primaries that they should move a bit to the left of they want to follow their constituents. Whether they do remains to be seen, but they won't need to if the right is divided.
Keep in mind that that pressure is coming from outside the Democratic party. Internal structures are pushing back very hard on that transition
I hope he has all the success he deserves.
I would love to see it, seriously. Just like how I would love to see the growth of the Green Party, a Communist party, a Socialist Democrats party, a Christian Nationalist party, and a Nazi party in America.
With a first past the post system?
It will just be more republicans rebranded. I love when conservatives go after each other with their severe purity tests, they then split up. They divide themselves. This only serves the Democrats better.
This is not good news
It would actually be very good news because it would split the right-wing vote. But I doubt it will actually happen.
Split the Republican party into its two halves. The evil half and the idiot half.
They're the same picture.
It would probably split the centrist dem vote too, fml
It might get the same people that might fall for the Green Party, honestly.
With the way America's election system works, a third party is always bad news for the most similar party. If 15% of voting republicans and 10% of voting democrats switch to this new party, that converts a 50 50 race to a 40 35 25 race, with democrats winning.
The way it could be bad for non-MAGA people would be if enough sane republicans, if there are any left, decide to vote in the third party's primaries, leaving the insane republicans voting in the original republican party's primaries, causing the republican candidates to become even more extreme, leading to some elections where the choices are right, far right, and extreme right.
Yup. He can be the new Reform Party.
More like Restore party. Tucker, MTG, Fuentes are all white supremacists. They're nazis.
I mean they can split the vote just like the Reform Party did.
Yeah, these guys would probably be better off pairing up with something like the Constitution Party (or some other fringe winger party that's been kicking around for a while) and take that over, but with the egos we are dealing with, I don't think it's likely.
Whatever fragments the right wing.
This won't fragment the right wing one bit.
We went through the exact same exercise with the Tea Party during the Obama era. Some of these "third party" candidates will be elected to Congress, maybe form their own caucus, maybe piss off the Speaker on a few inconsequential votes... but then ultimately they'll just continue to vote with the GOP 98% of the time and nothing of any consequence will change.
One could say he wants a third position party ....
It was created after the collapse of the Golden State Party, a party founded by a group called Freedom 14, after its leader was exposed as a felon.
Is this what's going to happen to the Republican party?