this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
29 points (85.4% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

21638 readers
11 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

Superman is an alien. The kind of alien he is can hold their breath for a very long time. That means he can travel in space without having to breathe until he runs out of the air in his lungs.

The reason he doesn't just take every fight to space is because he's a hero, and he tries very hard not to kill the people he fights. So he only takes the villains that will survive up there.


That's the proper eli5 version that is likely what a kid would want to know.

But there is a good bit of lore behind it. Superman's breath holding ability has changed over time. Originally, it was only enough for short trips without breathing. Afaik, that was the case until after he died and came back, in comics. I don't think the Reeve movies really showed enough of that part of his power set to have an answer in that universe.

After he died and came back, a lot of lore was covered regarding why he could come back, and his unique solar based physiology became the default explanation for all of his powers. They expanded most of his power set as he recovered from resurrection. Instead of it being less than an hour or so, he started being able to go for hours. Iirc, that was enough to get him anywhere in the solar system without supplemental oxygen.

Over time, the explanation expanded to include the idea that he uses oxygen in his metabolism when it's available, and will default to it because it's more efficient than using solar energy to fuel his life processes. He is not (again, afaik, I haven't read his comics in a few years, and the current DC movie universe is vague) able to solely survive from sunlight alone.

I think he's currently not able to just straight fly to another star system, but can be in space for extended time, days to a week or two. As always, he's as powerful as he needs to be for the story, but long trips have generally shown him using a rebreather or some other type of air source. I can't remember the details, but he spends some extended time in space here and there after they introduced a son for him.

But, the part about why he doesn't just take fights to space as the default in universe is that he wouldn't just kill someone. Most of who he fights would die in space, so he only does that if the enemy can take it. Otherwise, why stop at space? Just take things into the sun, since some versions have him able to survive there.

The out-of-universe reason for comics is that space fights are boring in that format. Or at least that's what Didio said at a comic convention I went to ages ago when asked why they didn't take more fights off planet. Drawing panels for a fight is already a very specific art form. The kind of dynamic indicators to show movement as more than just a stillframe shot, giving that sense of action is what makes the great comic artist great

Doing that in space, with no background to help other than that earth and moon gets repetitive in a way that different buildings doesn't. All you can really do is show one or the other getting bigger/smaller in perspective. So it tends to be used to show how powerful a character is that they can fight in space, but then they go back to earth/planetary surface so it can be drawn more interesting.

And it doesn't take much hand waving. Why are the characters fighting? The typical reason is that the villain has a goal, and if the goal wasn't on earth, why would they bother landing in the first place? The story is going to have them at least trying to get down to the surface, no hand waving needed.

Space fights in animation and film are less constrained, and they do it more. They still run into trouble needing to show motion and perspective, but just the ability to have stars in the background makes it work. Look at the scenes in Invincible that are roughly the same in print and the show. Like with Allen first fighting Mark, the scene is handled slightly differently in each.

The usual caveat: I can't be arsed to treat lemmy like a school essay with citations, so I'm working from memory and that means flaws in detail.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because you're trying to use logic when there really isn't any. At least for the space thing, he isn't trying to kill people and I imagine a lot of the stronger villains could survive in space as well.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Logic" doesn't generally mean what you're trying to say here. Well written stories and fictional universes have consistent reasonable logic that only differs from our own wirh intentional changes like "magic is real" or narrative biases like "we would have told this story a different way if the hero lost."

A better term for what comic book stories with a mish-mash of power definitions and unexplained characterization lack is consistency.

(But, as with "literally", the inaccurate and informal usage you probably mean to decry the medium's unrealistic conventions is probably in the dictionary already, thanks to the cryoto-Jewish space-elves of a certain fun but overrated television show)

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Consistency is a problem as well, but that is not what I meant. Logic is the correct term. Inconsistency would be him sometimes breathing in space and/or not breathing on Earth. Which is probably also inconsistent. The general rule is, breathes on earth and not in space. Logically, you either need to breathe or you don't. If you need to breathe, how do you survive in space? If you don't need to breathe, why do you breathe at all?

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pure logic does not include axioms like "you need to breathe or you don't", nor does logic lead from the axioms "not all beings need to breathe" and "you can't breathe in space" to conclusions such as either "all creatures who breathe cannot survive in space" or "no beings who can survive in space are able to breathe."

A and not-B does not lead to if-not-B-then-A.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's a much better argument to make.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago

Superman's body is capable of both aerobic and anaerobic cellular respiration, but aerobic is more efficient and provides more energy, therefore Superman breathes when he can.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He’s holding his breath?

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

This. It has been depicted many times that for deep space exploration, Superman uses a space suit.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Because you can't breathe in space.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago

Plot, willing suspension of disbelief, entertainment

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because it’s a fictional story

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

At the time of this comment, there are 3 answers like this in the thread with only 2 actual attempts at the question.

I think we need to popularize an "askfiction" community with a rule about Watsonian vs Doylist answers. IMO the Doylist answers are mostly flippant and unhelpful.

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WatsonianVersusDoylist

Yes it's fiction, but OP is asking for an answer within that framework, if such an answer exists

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or just don’t over-analyze the shit of out every story in existence. Stories are stories because they’re fiction. And this is “explain like I’m five”, that’s exactly the answer I’d give a five year old

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

People enjoy logical consistency, and shutting down a kids question with "it's fake, don't think about it" is a lame way to respond to questions when you could take the opportunity to expand their understanding of the world. It's also helpful to develop counterfactual reasoning (how would things change if X happened) and fiction allows someone to explore concepts in different ways.

Regardless, ELI5 is "explain in a way that even a 5 year old would understand", not "what would you say if a 5 year old asked the question"

[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Could you explain your second question about the cardboard? Went right over my head.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Throwing villains through entire buildings where people are just sitting at their desks waiting for lunchtime.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's like that scene where superman saves the squirrel. Making up for all this unintended ancillary deaths. Although presumably he has x-ray vision and only throws dudes into the vacant conference rooms but I guess it depends on your super man

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://youtu.be/Cl_5UwS57X8

What's interesting is that, in this series, he uses a breather in space.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean the people he fights that would be disadvantaged in space are just regular ass people, and the ones that aren't regular ass people function better in space than Supes. There is no need to take Lex Luthor into space when, if he wanted to kill him, Superman could just punch him or melt him with laser eyes.