this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
227 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

86010 readers
3829 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 hour ago

Jeeezus. Who uses these products? They are cumbersome to begin with, and so much worse with enshittification

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Usually one would wait til their product take over the market before enshitifying it. For this one, they don't even have a feasible market. Who am I to judge tho.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

This bait-and-switch bullshit has gone way too far and I hope the few dozen socialists that get elected this fall really wreck this shit for the billionaires and force regulation.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 16 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Good headline. Didn't call them "owners". Because this doesn't happen to something you own.

Article's first sentence already fails though.

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Well that was fast

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 67 points 9 hours ago

Enshitification of shit. They truly are meta.

[–] red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com 134 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

Expected asshole behavior from Meta and zero sympathy to people who buy that trash.

[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 31 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I was about to type pretty much the exact same thing, but I figured it would already be here for me to upvote :)

[–] Stormy@thelemmy.club 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I wasn't paying attention when Facebook began ruining technology with bad business decisions but it's getting old.

I have an oculus VR that's basically useless now that meta owns the company. They decided to stop updating it, so my 450 dollar bought brand new hoped it would last for life is a paper weight.

Pay wall for already way too expensive and kind of pointless glasses? Like what. Is that how they're making money now?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago

androids like zuckerberg are unlikely to have emotions, or humanity.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago
[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 28 points 10 hours ago

Nothing fills my heart with such joy as negative Meta headlines.

[–] Trebuchet@europe.pub 14 points 9 hours ago

Good. Perverts.

[–] CTDummy@aussie.zone 20 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I was always a fan of Ray Ban and got their glasses/sunglasses. Guess I need to look elsewhere since this god awful partnership.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 24 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Personally i avoid visible branding, and at that point you can just go with whatever frame you like. Investing in high quality lenses is much better spent money in my experience, lightweight+deglared+extra thin lenses make a world of difference for comfortable wearing over longer time for me.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 hours ago

Apparently when you get Ray Ban frames for prescription glasses, you can pay extra to have the Ray Ban logo engraved on them. So if you see someone with prescription glasses with the Ray Ban logo, you can lose a little more respect for them.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

Might I suggest Persol?

Sadly, they are expensive, but they look good and have great quallity in my experience.

As for glasses, five years ago, I got my first Lindberg glasses, and I am never going back to other brands.

I am currently on my third pair of black Lindberg Aaron and my current sunnies are a pair of gunmetal Persol PO1027S with custom brown lenses.

I have all of my pervious Lindberg frames and will start reusing them next time, as for the Persol, I lost my earlier pair of an earlier model of Persol sunglasses, but I plan on getting new models or a new pair of the same model to have some spares or variation.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I used to like Ray Bans, too. Then Luxotica bought them and they've never got any on my money since. I buy exclusively from Costco because they only sell non-Luxotica brand glasses for significantly cheaper.

Prescription sunglasses look identical to aviators, at a fraction of the price.

[–] eighty@aussie.zone 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

did not know Costco sold exclusively non-luxo glasses - interest piqued

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Sam's does the same and you don't need a membership to use the eye center for either.

[–] Prathas@lemmy.zip 9 points 9 hours ago
[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 10 hours ago

Sucked in, dickheads!

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

Like, basic vision? That would be funny