this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
182 points (99.5% liked)

News

38342 readers
1999 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/49354026

The Trump administration is suing Maryland over a recent law barring state and local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The 33-page complaint, filed Thursday, seeks to have Senate Bill 791, or the Community Trust Act, declared unconstitutional and asks a judge to enter an injunction blocking the state from enforcing the law.

...

The lawsuit also contains two counts premised on immunity – alleging the Maryland law attempts to unlawfully regulate federal law enforcement and discriminates against immigration agents.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blatant disregard of Federal law?

Like not releasing the Epstein files?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago

How about the felonies? He never had any punishment for those. It's absolutely outrageous.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I thought he was talking about himself.

[–] morgan_423@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Hoping they get a nice dismissal and a smack down reminder that state agencies are NOT federal agencies by definition, and are free to direct their resources in any way the state government deems best.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this not the right way for states to assert their rights?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago

Of course not. States are only allowed to assert state rights when it benefits Republicans or hurts poor/brown people.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Police forces are from powers that inherently lie with the states under the 10th Amendment.

There is no obligation for the states to support/enforce Congress's regulations from article 1. That lies with Article 2's (executive) obligation such that Article 1 (Congress) apportions for it. Congress can make an alotment to entice the states to support Article 2's obligation, but that is not inherently required to be accepted. If a state prosecutor refers a conviction to ICE at some point, that is up to prosecutorial discretion such that the state doesn't direct its agents to not do so.

Basically, the states can do whatever they want to ensure the heath, safety, and welfare of its populous such that those actions do not violate the Bill of Rights as incorporated to apply against them via the 14th Amendment.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago

Man, his glass house is just about back to being sand at this point

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago

The Trump administration is suing Maryland over a recent law barring state and local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The 33-page complaint, filed Thursday, seeks to have Senate Bill 791, or the Community Trust Act, declared unconstitutional and asks a judge to enter an injunction blocking the state from enforcing the law.

...

The lawsuit also contains two counts premised on immunity – alleging the Maryland law attempts to unlawfully regulate federal law enforcement and discriminates against immigration agents.