this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
121 points (99.2% liked)

News

38342 readers
2103 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.ph/h2Idy

A growing number of candidates are seeking federal office without the backing of either major party, as more Americans identify as political independents heading into the 2026 midterm elections.

A Newsweek analysis of independent congressional candidate lists found 217 entries across U.S. House and Senate races in the 2026 cycle: 170 for the House and 47 Senate hopefuls.

When multiple candidates running in the same House district or Senate state are combined, the lists cover 153 distinct contests—129 House districts or at-large seats and 24 Senate races. The largest concentrations appear in Texas, Illinois, New York, California, Washington and Virginia.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 50 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

We need ranked choice voting.

I WANT to vote for the non-status-quo Dems, but I also do not want to risk my state falling to the MAGAt morons.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 16 points 21 hours ago

the status-quo-dems and Republicans say "no deal"

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'd probably switch my party designation if we didn't have closed primaries here in Oregon. They've made it so you have to kiss the ring in order to participate in democracy.

In Virginia there is no party registration, but you can only vote in one or the other on primary day...

When there is no one candidate that stands out on the Democrat side, I'll usually pull a Republican primary ballot and vote for the most left leaning republican of the bunch... They never win, but anything to undermine their standing as shoe-in is better than nothing.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

They've made it so you have to kiss the ring in order to participate in democracy.

That's honestly how it has been, since the writing of the constitution, for the entire country...

The ring belonging to the rich, of course.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I haven't declared any party and never will. In my state you just pick which primary you want to vote in. I even moved states to another state that didn't require it.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

In retrospect, my point was slightly tangential. I was lamenting the fact that the system itself is designed in such a way that anyone who wants to run for office is incentivized to seek funds from those with wealth - they must kiss the ring. It's meant to ensure that only capital-approved candidates ever make it onto the ballots. Only massive organizing efforts can push through that barrier. If you piss enough people off, they'll overcome such barriers and that scares the ever-loving shit out of the rich who know what's up.

[–] cookiecoookie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Same in South Dakota, only Republicans get primaries here.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The whole of Idaho makes sense seeing how radical the right wing has become and by extension the left has also warped into something unrecognizable.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 22 hours ago

Idaho only has two House seats, so it's not too hard to cover the whole thing.

I do note with some interest that while Wyoming and North Dakota aren't on there, Idaho and West Virginia are. Those four states were the four states with the highest percentage share for Trump in 2024, and both Idaho and West Virginia have independents running in all House districts.