this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
558 points (99.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46751 readers
574 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yuki_gassen@lemmy.ml 23 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

"I'm not gonna engage in the theater"

Proceeds to make it more and more theatrical with every word

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago

he prefers broadway dramas.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 6 points 15 hours ago

Wishful thinking. Have you seen the Brett Kavanagh job interview lol?

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it's really a job interview then why didn't the guy move on to the next candidate

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Because half the hiring committee sees nothing wrong with this man's behavior.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

That means half the committee should be on the list.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 235 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If I answered a question like that in an interview for a job at McDonalds, I'd be laughed right the fuck out of the room. This should be instantly disqualifying, but in this admin, brazen dishonesty and cronyism is a must have.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It’s similar to a question that doctors will ask you in the emergency department: “who is the president?”

Alongside questions like “what year is it?”

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

The very fact that he is so rude and not forthright, is because he knows it doesn't matter. This is all formality. His position has been filled, by himself.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's one of the most frustrating parts about all this, so few people are rational, so few people have standards or honor.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In other administrations, too. The definition of truth belongs to the majority holder.

If the opposition to the GOP do not get a majority, and really a super-majority is what's truly needed... If that doesn't happen, there's no salvation for the United States.

I'd argue that it's been gone for a while, but I simply cannot give up yet.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

For there to be a real path out of this they need to be willing to strike a stake into the heart of the republican vampire party:

  • Fully reform the supreme court with sane people who will overturn citizens united.

(Personally I would add every goddamn american citizen to the supreme court because its a lifetime appointment and the public would be way better the corrupt nutjobs currently running the asylum)

Additionally like 3 of the following:

  • Commit to passing some real ass electoral reforms to enforce the 14th ammendment.
  • Commit to reforming the way congressional districts are drawn or eliminate them entirely with proportional voting mandates
  • Bring DC and Puerto Rico in as states. Threaten to offer cuba statehood and reparations if republicans invade it based on some kind of generational grudge held by rich casino owner's grandparents.
  • ensure the electoral college is handled on a proportional basis, if not eliminated entirely.

And then looking to the future:

  • address the corruption stemming from the billionaire classes
  • use billionaire money to directly pay reparations to people placed in camps by trump admin
  • prosecute ice agents involved in murders.
  • ensure all tech companies remotely linked to social media, search, surveillance or data collection are run as non profit utilities under laws similar to those we require for power companies.
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 15 hours ago

Either way you're fucked. Both parties want to continue burning fossil fuels and both parties are blatently beholden to Israel's suicidal assault on the world.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 128 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] schwim@piefed.zip 83 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he were an outlier, it would be something funny but the issue is rhe staggering number of the pieces of shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mr. Ossoff is a beast - only in the best way!

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't seen a more well-spoken, eloquent, and impactful speaker in years, dude. Where can I see this full video and more of him?

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I believe you can say cunt here, if you want - it's not reddit ;)

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah I know, I self-censor sometimes because in my head when something is "bleeped" it sounds more offensive 😁

If there's no taboo there's no effect.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 115 points 1 day ago

Isn’t it humiliating to be unable to answer this basic question

His delivery really nails him.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 82 points 1 day ago

Didn't even respond with the usual "Joe Biden was confirmed as the winner". Just refusing to answer is an even bigger piss-baby thing to do. It's a great and simple question to see if you'll put loyalty to one man above truth, and shows how much integrity you have in one simple question.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

An autistic person simply could not do this. Its not in our nature to ride trump's dick so hard that we could deny very obvious things.

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

Obstructing the government is my special interest

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He knows he’ll get confirmed anyway and whatever he does he’ll get a presidential pardon.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Not necessarily. A president can pardon someone who was legally convicted. He can't bottle a pardon for later.

So if after Trump the big cleanup will come, they all will have to face consequences, until some idiot later president will pardon them.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You can totally pardon someone for something they haven't been convicted of. For example, Biden did this for him, his family, and others when he left office.

I assume there must be a mechanism that could be created to remove pardons though? If someone like Trump just pardons everyone for doing crimes for him, there must be a way to say they were corrupt, and they don't offer protections.

[–] asret@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like you're both right - you can pardon people for things they have done, not things they will do. This ain't the church after all.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, definitely not things you may do in the future, that's for sure.

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Vietnam draft dodgers were pardoned without charges or convictions.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

Of course they can. Nixon wasn't convicted, or even charged, yet Ford pardoned him.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

It's highly improbably, but couldn't in theory Trump use his justice department to convict everyone and then pardon em?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] urno@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kind of annoying that they don’t ask them who won in 2024 or 2016 too. Or first. Or a really old one like Reagan.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah, ‘16 and ‘24 aren’t really contested in Trump’s mind because Trump won those (maybe; lawsuits are pending, etc) but the ‘20 election is contentious for fascist fucks everywhere.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago

because they know they cheated in 2020, and still lost, projection all around.

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 33 points 1 day ago

Yeah but from an interviewing perspective it's a win-win. Either the guy answers the question for those elections more clearly, showing that he only has a problem answering the one about 2020 and therefore clearly doing it because of the orange man, or he still refuses and he looks like he can't answer simple questions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 28 points 1 day ago

Love the questioning. I was hoping for a dismissive "ok we'll call you back".

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

These people are disconnected from reality and need real psychological help. In the meantime, this behavior is not acceptable for anyone in any kind of official position. Hell, this amount of deflection wouldn't even be acceptable if he were trying to be a fucking barista.

No offense at all meant to baristas. You have likely worked harder than this clown ever will.

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

I'd actually like to disagree that they're disconnected from reality. This is about as realistic as things can get in politics.. :(

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 16 points 1 day ago

They're not disconnected from reality. They are liars, cheaters, thieves, and crooks.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pathetic. My last shit had more integrity, and I have diarrhea.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›