this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
620 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

10229 readers
696 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 days ago

Listen here, on behalf of goths, kindly fuck off

The 90s' "manic pixie" thing was real AF. πŸ˜…

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Camera and photo quality were lacking then compared to now. Gotta work with what ya got!

I wish I could get back into my old myspace account. I bet there's some treasures there haha

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

It might be on internet archive

[–] troybot@piefed.social 20 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I have some bad news for you. MySpace changed ownership several times and the current owners did a botched server migration with no backup.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

I wouldn’t really have expected them to keep all that shit anyway.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gather 'round the social media garbage fire children, and let me tell you a tale of the before times...

At the time, having a camera on your phone was a new thing. Phones were for calling/SMS, maybe playing snake if you bought a flagship model. If you wanted good pictures you'd have to spend $200-300 on a digital camera (in 2000 dollars, $400-$600 today) or take a film photograph and have the negatives scanned (drug stores and some retail stores also did film processing).

Very few people had laptops, mostly people who would frequently travel or tech professionals/nerds(same thing, at the time) but most people had a home desktop PC and they would often purchase a separate external camera to use for video chatting on the web; hence, the term: webcam. Since they were not restricted in size by being in a phone, they could use larger sensors and so they typically had a higher quality (but not by much) than phone cameras. Also, image processing was way too heavy of a lift for phone processing hardware, so they often sent the image directly off the sensor while PC webcam software could include basic things like denoising and exposure adjustment.

In order to make images with an effect like Instagram filters, you'd have to use Photoshop and the average person just knew enough to run a web browser and login to myspace. Instead of filters people would use lighting and angles. You've probably heard the term 'myspace angles', this is approximately the era where that term was invented.

All of that being said, Boxxy had a good webcam but she was doing a bit and the overexposure was part of the bit. Evanescence's use is more of an artsy representation of the same mainstream style that Boxxy was parodying.

We also wore an onion on our belt, which was the style at the time.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Deno-is-ing? The fuck kind of tech is that

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

The one on the left is an album cover and that style was very popular in the 2000s. Especially in cheesy sci-fi shows (looking at you Stargate Atlantis…)

The one on the right though, that’s just what cell phone and cheap digital camera pictures looked like when you posted them on MySpace.

Don't forget danger will robinson I forget the name

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I think you're left/right ~~confused~~ good at. The left one is the cover of the Evanescence album Fallen from 2003. The one on the right is Boxxy.

I was there Gandalf.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago

Whats a bit amusing is that abpit 10 years seperated Evanacence at their peak and Boxxy. These really are not even from the same "era".

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's Boxxy, and you don't use that adjective for Boxxy. That's prob 480p early YouTube.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DeLancre@piefed.social 49 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Lol I saw the same thing

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago

β€œRe… Re-L!”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] candyman337@piefed.ca 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

These youths don't realize that's just what digital cameras looked like at the time, insta filters didn't exist!

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This picture (not me) is better than most of the pictures I could get with a camera back then

Hey everyone look what lifeinmultiplechoice looked like

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 40 points 1 week ago
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I'M NOT TROOOOOLING ! IM BOXXY !

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Duranie@literature.cafe 34 points 1 week ago

I saw Evanescence last week! (With Spiritbox and Nova Twins).

The level of goth in the audience across the generations made me happy 😁.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Don't forget the MySpace angle.

... duck face was a mistake though, jfc.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Don’t forget the MySpace angle.

What, like from the side?

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 6 days ago

Good old Tom.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OR3X@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Boxxy!! I named my new vehicle after her!

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The old fag war has resumed?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] lordziv@lemmy.nz 5 points 6 days ago

It's sad that this image has become nostalgic for me.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

It’s hot.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

This style still rules imo

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

Simple and effective

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This would be contrast, not exposure, no? High exposure would boost the lows too. Very erm ackchyually, I know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

the second is what a webcam would look like with normal lighting. all these popular streamers/youtubers nowadays have production crews.

also, using two examples to make a point, one being an album cover with a particular aesthetic that was popular and has nothing to do with the second image.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

turning the exposure up

Sure, by using the definitely-existent photo settings on your Razr to change the output of your 0.001 megapixel camera (that turns the battery into a cooktop when the camera stays on for more than 3 seconds).

Or by using Photoshop CS3 after paying $800 or downloading [-Photosh0p-].mp3 (2).exe.rar through Limewire.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί