this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
101 points (94.7% liked)

politics

30453 readers
2181 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

shit for brains. He actually has shit for brains. So does Bernie Moreno.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5972839-moreno-sanction-canada-wildfires/

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Will the Untied States be penalized for their willful negligence in letting a nazi felon get control of the country?

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What a demented wanker ( no offence intended to demented people in general).

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Or wankers?

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Even though this is just another tax on Americans, it's time for Canada to stop sending fire assistance to the US. I live in BC and we deal with smoke coming from Washington State every summer.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 14 hours ago

As a Washingtonian, I'm disappointed that you don't share allegiance to our region the way so many of us do. British Columbia means more to many of us than some random American state elsewhere does. Not many of us would be in favor of dropping support of and cooperation with British Columbia even if the Canadian government was being belligerent.

Neighbors come first.

Also, we get your smoke every summer as well. That's part of why we're in this together.

[–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

I hate that Trump is using this as a political attack but I'd be pretty bummed out if we stopped helping people in need.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What percentage of carbon emissions does the US account for? Half?

They can fuck off, we helped with their fires, their fires sent smoke here, I’m done with these fucks.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

12-14% today, and roughly 25% all time.

That's 10 times as much as Canada, to or it in perspective. Per capita, however, US and Canada are roughly equal. I won't say who leads. I'm also not sure per capita matters when the environment doesn't care.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 2 points 13 hours ago

I'd like to say that the US military is completely unaccounted for in any emissions statistic

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

If only Canada had diligently raked all their forests - as Donnie recommended to California years ago - none of these wildfires would have occurred in the first place! /s

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Willful Negligence” would be a good title for a book on the entire trump presidency.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago

Intentional Incompetence would also work.

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

He's out of his element...

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 19 points 1 day ago

When I say I support taxing carbon emissions, this is very much not what I mean.

"Man punches himself in groin to punish local harlot for giving him crabs"

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

No, let him say that bad quality air can be tariffed. This may finally push the economy to have to pay for pollution.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Wilful" is diametrically different from "negligence". Where wilful shows intent, negligence shows accident.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's not right. Negligence doesn't have to be accidental, it just means neglect. That can be a neglect of responsibilities or a duty that you willfully choose to ignore. None of that has anything to do with this situation, but you're wrong about your interpretation of the words and willfull negligence absolutely is a thing. A parent that sits and watches TV or plays video games while their kid is screaming in the next room(about something that requires adult intervention) is making an active and willful choice to neglect their child. Or oil companies that were aware of the consequences of carbon emissions and chose not to action any action except to deceive the public about it.

[–] bedifferent@mastodon.social 1 points 1 day ago

@emeralddawn45 @Sunflier Did you even have to say, "That's not right." He lies and doesn't stop because it makes him money Kleptocracy