this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
546 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

86814 readers
3826 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago

At least he didn't have to spend all that money on higher salaries. How you boys liking the rocket game? I'm thinking about blowing a few dozen billion on that, just as a hobby. Not trying to make money off it.

[–] Exatron@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Couldn't have happened to a more deserving bot.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 25 points 5 hours ago

Marky Zuckerberg may run Meta into the ground however the fucker will still be rich.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 3 hours ago

It wont matter four shits to him, its all just playthings

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 24 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Outside of Facebook what has he been responsible for that didn't blow up in his face? The only other things Meta has that aren't thus far miserable failures are Instagram and Whatsapp, both of which they bought.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

Reminder that he stole Facebook

[–] bananabread@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Oculus perhaps, although also bought

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

What is the state of VR? Still super niche?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 hours ago

And immediately blew it up after buying it.

[–] bad1080@piefed.social 38 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

amazing how many missteps you can make as a ceo these days without consequences...

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

Tells you a lot about success and merit. He has absolutely no fucking clue what's going to be successful and what won't. He was just super lucky with Facebook.

The reason he's a billionaire is because the system is totally fucked up. He's a bug, not a feature.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 18 points 6 hours ago

It's what happens when you own a controlling share of the company. You can freely run it into the ground.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Such a punchable face. He and his wife are evil people. Stains on humanity.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I keep asking myself why he’s still there. Even Bezos retired at this point.

[–] jrs100000@lemmy.world 2 points 14 minutes ago

The only way to get him out of the CEO chair is for him to retire or die. He never gave up voting control during the IPO and controls more than 50% of the vote.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 9 points 6 hours ago

Gods I wish this was literal.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 59 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Has he picked a single winner since he stole the idea for facebook?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I thought he actually stole the source code, not just the idea.

[–] Maldaya@sh.itjust.works 33 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Probably only when he bought out Instagram and Whatsapp, that's all I can think of

He bought 100 lottery tickets through acquisition (probably more) and 2 of them hit.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 32 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Those were already popular before he bought them, and then he made them worse.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 16 points 9 hours ago

...but no less popular

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dil@piefed.zip 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They are automatically putting ppls pictures in image to video ai without permission and advertising it back to them

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 9 points 6 hours ago

For real? That is some dystopian Minority Report level advertising right there.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 27 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Destroying civilization, and destroying shareholder value.

What is his actual function?

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Shining a light on why rich people are the result of inadequacies in the system.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

To be one of many examples of how a human can have net negative value?

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

If you are still actively using Facebook you are either over 40 or live in a rural area of the country. As an example, I live in a small rural town of less than 4000 people everybody still uses Facebook and the amount of AI that they are liking sharing commenting on is absurd.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

In all honesty everyone of all ages here use Facebook religiously it’s kinda impressive. As an example, I have a coworker who is five years older than me. We were talking about old music from the 90s and I told him to look up a YouTube channel of old 90s rock music and he looked at me confused and said “what is YouTube?” I gave him a basic rundown of what YouTube is and his response was it sounds like woke bullshit. If it’s not on Facebook, I’m not watching it as far as I know that is his only connection to the outside world other than basic cable.

[–] polle@feddit.org 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I just recently learned that is only true for some places on earth. In Hungary if you want to find any event, you have to still use Facebook. I have seen people using Facebook messenger on a phone, which i have never seen before 🤣.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly, I do still have a Facebook. I rarely use it anymore, but because of the ubiquity of everyone here using it, you still have to log on once in a while to stay informed of events or anything going on currently there is a wildfire close to my hometown and most of the information is posted on Facebook, but the crazy thing is a lot of local people have been posting AI footage of the wildfire or AI god prayer quotes asking for help and protecting the firefighters and are also trying to turn this fire political for some reason.

[–] polle@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

ai wildfire footage and ai GOD PRAYER QUOTES.

I am just speechless.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 175 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

You mean, just like his pivot to VR?

[–] oh_@lemmy.world 130 points 15 hours ago (8 children)

Exactly. Zuck stole the original idea to Facebook. Then bought a ton of companies after that for innovation. He has no good ideas of his own, when he does think of stuff, they are wild big company pivots that fail.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 81 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Zuck has never had an original idea in his head, ever. His initial claim to fame, prior to FB, at least on college campus' was making a "hot or not" clone utilizing photos from various Harvard facebooks. Every idea since then has been someone elses or he's tried to take the Apple approach of "let someone else do it first, then we improve on it" except he has never been able to nail down the second part. The only reason FB became successful was the initial exclusivity and it filled the gap of a post 20-something myspace/ICQ/AOL IM world.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

At the time the idea was super innovative and it was fun to see your classmate’s photos.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 hours ago
[–] protist@retrofed.com 55 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

This video on how much of the debt these companies hold is hidden from their balance sheets is chilling. According to this, Meta "officially" owes $151B, but in reality has debt obligations closer to $572B.

That's over 40% of Meta's entire market capitalization, and they're rapidly adding to that debt. Meta's existing properties are losing users, and there's just no fucking way they'll be able to pay back this debt in the long term, because they have zero hope of deriving income from all this data center investment. At some point, BlackRock and the other private equity firms Meta owes money to are going to come looking for blood

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They are all going into debt over datacenters. Google issued new shares... how? why? They all make so much money and still they can't cashflow this expansion.

What blood will there be to take?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It’s all saturated and nobody really needs anything new anymore. There’s nowhere to go. We should expect to see some of these firms suddenly collapse like Silicon Valley Bank did.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Cynically though... they've been peddling nothing for two decades now. Big data, the cloud, SAAS, web 3.0, metaverse, nfts, llms, there's always a new nothing born.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I think they supports my point. There really is no need for a Web 3.0. Progress for the simple sake of progress is really just marketing a money grab.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I guess they’re waiting for Peter Thiel to save them, again, when he turns the data centers into data lakes for palantir and we go full surveillance state. I do believe there is some end game these tech billionaires believe is on the horizon that we aren’t really privy to, it’s just a matter of them making it come to fruition before reality crashes down on their heads. Bankrupting them faster through boycotts is a good way the average person can help speed up reality and slow down their progress.

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Ugh. I'm so sorry and angry every time I think on this...

...Full surveillance state. I do believe there is some end game these tech...on the horizon...matter of them making it come to fruition before reality crashes down on their heads...

We should bankrupt them faster because it's what they deserve, and the progress needs to be slowed at all costs.

But the reasons why all this is unfolding? Very clear to see, and you even referenced them without really pausing to consider.

Fascism isn't stupider this time around (in so far as being beyond the already astronomical stupidity required to believe it's a solution to fucking anything).

It's desperate. They didn't pivot away from their little spaceship dreams and into AI because it's more profitable. They don't care to come ahead in an economically sound world.

I'm sorry. Time has ran out on the climate and our biosphere, as far as them retaining the properties that allowed us the 'Modern World'.

There is no longer an avenue that averts widespread desolation, and they've known it all along because they don't actually all ignore scientific consensus, they just pay for the masses to ignore it.

It's going to be a gnarly and awful time, but humans aren't wired to just give up and die.

Hence the total surveillance state. Hence the mass casual cruelty with mass deaths. Hence the persecution of anyone who might oppose or see through it.

The world as we know it will be reduced to ashes, in our lifetimes, and we'll have to scramble to do whatever our species will do just to barely persist in some form, as that is just what we do.

They dream of a techno feudalist dreamscape where each little Dragon has their manageable fiefdom composed of a diminished and controllable populace to continue to carry out their self-aggrandizing whims. They can burn all of the economy now, because they're trying to trade it for straight power.

Joke's on them, they'll die by the masses too, and those that don't, will die by the masses. It's not that hard for thousands of angry and with nothing to lose people to go after them.

Their dream of Autonomous Weapon guardians is as laughable as the rest of the stupidity they've attempted and failed at throughout the years: It will be as imperfect a solution to what they're attempting as anything else they've ever done.

But we collectively let them have control of the playground while it was fresh and clean, so now we gotta deal with their bullshit king of the hill fantasies and the results of their evil stupidity.

I do believe there is some end game these tech billionaires believe is on the horizon

I think it's just a variant of the standard republican "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter". They think financial wealth is something they can just create out of thin air using AI (the way that government creates wealth out of thin air by printing money, allegedly), so as long as they acquire the data centers to fuel it, by whatever means necessary, they'll be all right in the end.

load more comments
view more: next ›