this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
173 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

86847 readers
3332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 13 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Alright, so he got addicted to what felt like an easy source of knowledge. Can happen to anyone.

I guess I'm just tired of finding things to be upset about. I've lived more than five decades and it's been outrage after outrage after outrage.

I'm tired, boss.

He's admitted there was a problem and it got out of hand. If he changes, what's the huge deal going forward?

We need social safety nets. We need universal health care. We need to kick fascists out of our government. And sure, we need to fix smaller problems, but jesus christ does every last thing have to be drama?

[–] steelplatedmech@piefed.ca 1 points 9 minutes ago

I'm glad I dont know who he is and I will continue to not know him.

These days it seems like the internet is more pleasant the less influencers you know, and most aren't worth knowing any further about.

I think the past where people's awareness of public figures was much more distant was a healthier time. Like knowing the famous athlete or actor, but nothing further about their lives and not feeling like "you know them" because they called our your username or liked your comment and not being able to send them a direct message.

[–] Sinthesis@lemmy.today 3 points 40 minutes ago

5 decade club reporting 🫡 and I'm tired too.

"If it bleeds, it leads." Drama leads to clicks, clicks lead to advertising, advertising = money. Same ol' story, its just super easy now with the internet.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I can understand why this technology would be particularly addicting to hank.

His whole persona is answering questions like "what color flower do bees like the most" with the kind of enthusiasm that shows his curiosity and deep passion for science. So a machine where you can put in those sorts of questions and get an almost instant answer would be very addicting.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 minutes ago

For what he's trying to do, it's not even a horrible use-case. But as someone is a ready to go to the mat on fact checking, he's definitely not anywhere near arduous enough about it.

He's not treating it like aunt marge. You wouldn't make a tv show around finding out truth, then go ask your aunt Marge and not follow up on her answers.

AI for general information gives you approximate directions at best, maybe you got a wikipedia page and maybe you're reading 297 regurgitations of some asshole that didn't know what the fuck he was talking about on reddit who got reposted over and over.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

But when I get fixated on something, I want the correct answer. I'd hate to learn the wrong answer and repeat it to someone - I've done that before and I hate it. That's why I avoid AI on principle. I want the right answer and AI won't give that to me about things I know about so I won't trust it on things I don't know about.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

I thought something was up when he had interviewed some random ass AI expert talking about Mythos because he bought into the whole "OMG it's gone rogue" bullshit.

I'm not a huge fan of the videos he hosts (I don't like how he cuts every millisecond between sentences), but SciShow is a genuinely good channel and I'm glad he realized he had problems. Wishing him all the best!

[–] arran4@aussie.zone 5 points 1 hour ago

Cognitive surrender for productivity?

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

when he messed up was when he pissed off the crochet and knitter crowd. 😂

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 82 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

What's scary to me is that Hank Green is a rationale, intelligent person with time, money, resources, etc. Everything someone could want to be successful at their passion. And in this case, the passion is literally explaining science. If his own family has to have an intervention on his AI use (which it seems like they did?) after he denied reciting AI prompts on video despite being caught red-handed (which it seems like he did?) what chance do normie script kiddy vibe coders have? Is this the future? Addicts with rotting brains and AI psychosis leading the planet to destruction?

The allure of outsourcing your mental load to a chat bot designed to tell you exactly what you want to hear is too much. Everyone's getting high off their own supply.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

It must feel godlike to manifest your will simply by speaking it. I can understand why that would addict people. This is exactly why they are pushing it so hard - they know it has this effect, people will demand it, they will fight for it. They will give over their enterprise and their personal lives to it, the way a drug or gambling addict gives over everything they have to it.

With that kind of impact - especially early on, before people realize they’ve been taken - they can build enough momentum to corner all compute.

No longer can we gather or organize without our names attached, without our intent scanned and analyzed, our location tracked, or our wallets closed. We will have to drink our verification cans, and we will have to be nice to Trump, or else they will see what you wrote on your iPad Cloud or your Google Pixel Light and then they will debank you, like waking up from the Matrix. “Go woke and go broke” was always a premonition about control.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I keep those power fantasies to my brain because I can tell the difference between a daydream and reality. I don’t care what AI could make me feel, I am never going to use it for anything if I’m aware of it.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Things are going to get a lot worse before they get better

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 28 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I really don't get it. It's so easy for me not to use AI 99% of the day, same as not using social media. I cannot understand why people get addicted to it so easily.

[–] 5wim@infosec.pub 1 points 40 minutes ago

I'm on your side, but replace AI or social media with "meth" in your argument and see how that logic works. (Becoming easily addicted to something vs. avoiding something [because using it would rapidly become addictive])

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He seems fairly prone to ego stroking, which internet goers would typically label as narcissistic.

Kind of the target audience for the sycophant machine

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

See the knitting debacle… where SciShow put out an episode about the science of knitting which was poorly researched and it was clear that they had consulted zero knitters.

I’ve always really liked SciShow - to the point I’ve assigned some episodes to my students - but it’s just embarrassing when it would have been trivially easy to hit up Ravelry and run the video past people who won’t call yarn “string.”

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 28 points 5 hours ago

Glad he's recognizing the problem and trying to get help. Instant gratification is a hell of a drug.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

I only started paying attention to him recently, but I could swear he had a little meltdown in a video hating AI and had to calm himself with his word association game. Maybe I’m thinking of his brother.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 198 points 8 hours ago (17 children)

I’ve been getting from interacting with LLMs…with doing more and more and more and more…is not healthy for me or good for the world. It is careless, and has disconnected me from where people are on this.

I think this is very honest and we shouldn't give someone shit for speaking up.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 62 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This. AI and more generally algorithm dependence is an addiction and watching him struggle with it the past few years has been heartbreaking. Watching him try to bargain and rationalize an objectively misanthropic technology that grew out of a sphere that he was a major role in and did begin as an objectively beautiful attempt at building community and healthy dialogue is very disappointing. I don't hate or judge him. He tried to do something beautiful. He just didn't understand the Faustian bargain he made in the process. The systemic forces turning his work into poison.

I don't judge him for wrestling with it. I'm sad for him. I'm sad for a lot of us. We're all working in a system that's slowly killing us to some degree or another. There is no ethically clean life in a system predicated on greed, gluttony and lies. His optimism may have slipped into delusional, but it beats the crushing cynicism that comes with naked realism.

I don't think that we should lose hope, but the future can't look like this. His Icarus moment shouldn't be the end of his journey. I hope he finds himself and begins planting new seeds even if none of us ever live to see the shade of the trees that grow from them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Agreed, this is new technology for everybody, we're allowed growing pains.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for linking that. I wonder how long he's been using it for. I feel like I noticed at uptick lately in just how saccharine his writing and worldview was getting

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah, that new cosmic shore video was really good. I'm kind of disappointed that might be just AI writing.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Was that the recent one about the NASA photos making a short gif? Maybe I'm just too insufferably pessimistic for that kind of thing

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

That's the one. Felt like he was going for a Sagan kind of prose, and was half decent. Though it rings a little hollow to me, now.

[–] bjc@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

ah yes, hank green who spent an entire video chastising the citizens of ireland for being ignorant of the amoc.

dude never even bothered to think people called it something else there.

hes always been a self-satisfied, arrogant knob

[–] postman@literature.cafe 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Had to Google AMOC?

Oh right, it's the famous Gulf Stream we rely on and are all worried about of late. Am in Ireland...

[–] bjc@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 2 hours ago

exactly. he spent 30 minutes calling the irish ignorant, but the words "gulf stream" never tickled his neurons.

the extra-irony is that up until the last 10-15 years, "gulf stream" is what everyone in the usa called it, too. hank's just so tech-pilled he can't see anything else.

load more comments
view more: next ›