472
submitted 10 months ago by tree@lemmy.zip to c/news@lemmy.world

Ashley Caswell had been jailed for substance use to “protect her unborn child.” When her water broke jail staff told her to “sleep it off," her lawsuit says.


On Friday, an Alabama woman named Ashley Caswell filed a lawsuit against Etowah County and the county sheriff’s department nearly two years after she was jailed while pregnant for alleged substance use, and was forced to give birth in the shower, according to the Guardian. Caswell was in labor for 12 hours and nearly died from blood loss before jail staff finally took her to the hospital, her lawsuit states.

Officers from the sheriff’s department arrested Caswell in March 2021 for alleged substance use on chemical endangerment charges because she was pregnant; her jailing at the Etowah County Detention Center, they reasoned, would “protect her unborn child.” Caswell, a mother of other young children, was held there for the next seven months of her pregnancy until, in October 2021, her water broke. She begged to be taken to the hospital but was told to “sleep it off” and wait until Monday (two days later) to give birth. Through Caswell’s 12 hours of labor, she was only offered Tylenol. The lawsuit alleges she lost so much blood, while left alone through her delivery in a jail shower, that she almost bled to death. Caswell is the latest person to report mistreatment at the detention center while pregnant or postpartum.

“Giving birth to my son without any medical help in the jail shower was one of the most terrifying experiences of my life. My body was falling apart, and no one would listen to me. No one cared,” Caswell said in a press release shared with Jezebel. “I thought I’d lose my baby, my life, and never see my other kids again.”

Caswell lost consciousness shortly after giving birth, and still, jail staff neglected to offer medical care. Upon finally being taken to the hospital, she was diagnosed with placental abruption and learned she almost had a stillbirth as the condition can result in the fetus being denied oxygen. When she was returned to the jail, her suit claims she was denied her prescribed breast pump and pain medication.

Caswell is represented by Pregnancy Justice and Southern Poverty Law Center. The organization has tracked over 150 “chemical endangerment” cases in Etowah County alone since 2010. While just 2% of Alabama’s population lives in Etowah County, it represents over 20% of pregnancy-related prosecutions in Alabama, which recorded the highest number of pregnancy-related criminal cases in the nation between 2006 and 2022. Chemical endangerment laws in the state are meant to protect born, living children from home meth labs—instead, they’re weaponized by law enforcement in Alabama (and states across the country) to criminalize and jail pregnant people.

“Ashley is the latest victim of the Etowah County Jail, which consistently punishes pregnant women in the name of protecting ‘unborn children’ while simultaneously endangering their lives,” Pregnancy Justice senior staff attorney Emma Roth said in a statement.

AL.com reported last year that as many as 12 pregnant or postpartum people suspected of substance use were held in Etowah County Detention Center in August 2022 alone. The conditions some of these women have reported are horrific, and include being forced to sleep on the floor after being jailed for alleged marijuana use, and denied sanitary products for bleeding after being jailed within days of giving birth. One woman was jailed for allegedly using substances while pregnant until a pregnancy test she’d initially been denied showed she wasn’t even pregnant.

Caswell is currently serving a 15-year sentence in state prison after being convicted of “Class C” felony chemical endangerment for her substance use while pregnant. As the Guardian notes, conviction on this charge “doesn’t require evidence that the fetus was harmed, but merely exposed to substances.”

“They stripped her of her dignity, violated her constitutional rights, and again showed their callous disregard for mothers and children,” Roth said. “The abuses and violations are numerous, and there is simply no word to describe what she endured other than ‘torture.’”

link: https://jezebel.com/alabama-woman-gave-birth-in-jail-shower-after-begging-t-1850926339

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 98 points 10 months ago
[-] 520@kbin.social 67 points 10 months ago

Jesus fucking Christ! This is all horrific but I nearly missed that part. 15 years for taking a substance that could endanger the baby (no need to prove that it has)

[-] Hupf@feddit.de 17 points 10 months ago

How about being clawed away from your mommy and not being able to grow up with her. That should do good to the little fella for sure.

[-] fluke@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

It says they wanted to protect the unborn baby. Not the born one.

Duh.

[-] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

This is Alabama we’re talking about, if they could jail the baby for being born in jail they would.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 months ago

But a company head makes a decision that siphons billions of dollars from poor people, or directly endanger other people's lives, or, hell, risk the future of our fucking civilization (looking at you Exxon), and maaaybe they get a slap on the wrist if we're lucky. But only after rising hell on earth for that.

..but a woman gets accused of substance use that might hurt her unborn child, and she gets 15 years. Ruining not only her life, but also her unborn child's, ironically enough.

If aliens looked down at us on earth, they would have thought we were some uncivilized savages about to blow ourselves up to kingdom come.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

US sentences are ridiculous in general.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 10 months ago

Kinda sickening that prisoners are treated like livestock once they are in the system. Even once they are out, they are branded for life no matter the crime.

[-] thantik@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

It's the only condition for slavery that we still have. We need to amend the constitution to disallow slavery even as punishment for broken laws.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Yup, in most other civilized nations imprisonment is a path to rehabilitation. In the US it’s punishment, usually by contributing to the capital of a private corporation

[-] stephan262@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago

So much of this is fucked up beyond belief.

Being to told to "sleep off" her water breaking is just horrific. I'd expect anyone with even the most rudimentary understanding of pregnancy to know that her water breaking means that birth is only hours away at the most, she can't just hold it in for two days.

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Also, once the water breaks the risk of infection for the baby goes waaaaay up and then, like you said, you are on the clock.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 45 points 10 months ago

Man, what a fucked up story. I hope she gets massive reparations from this and hopefully this will get big enough to do some actual change. But I doubt that.

[-] angrymouse@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

they reasoned, would “protect her unborn child.”

Oh yeah, I can see.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Republicans treat babies and soldiers very similarly. When you’re in the womb/military it’s “protect our children/soldiers”, but once you’re out, you get the big old fuck you

[-] DrDominate@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

If this article is anything to go by they don't even have to be out yet to be given the American middle finger

[-] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 22 points 10 months ago

I have a feeling if this detention facility is a private company and it were to be sued in a mass lawsuit from all these women being denied care, it would probably change its name after declaring bankruptcy then be back in business the next day under a new holding company.

If it is public then the men who are undoubtedly in charge of it should all be thrown in to this facility with a false positive pregnancy test on their file to serve 15 years for child endangerment themselves.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I agree with you. But either way they should be thrown into their own prison, public or private

[-] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago

Yes they should be tossed into prison with incorrect identification so that they can't use connections to get preferential treatment while in there. Give them a few years of random solitary confinement and no communication with the outside world.

[-] synae 17 points 10 months ago

I can think of a few people that should be on trial for endangering her child.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Is there a such thing as a "good conservative"? Serious question. Because I can't seem to find one, and I live in the southern U.S. in an area completely infested by conservatives.

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

History proves conservativism only leads to suffering and pain so I would say no, if you are a conservative you believe in human suffering

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
472 points (97.4% liked)

News

22488 readers
5093 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS