this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
62 points (100.0% liked)

traingang

22859 readers
7 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bonus Oklahoma "city"

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kestrel@hexbear.net 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)
  1. build suburban stuff to increase tax base
  2. suburban stuff built generates not enough taxes to maintain itself
  3. repeat as long as possible as infrastructure deteriorates
  4. ???
  5. bankruptcy (see Detroit, Flint)
[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago
  1. always blame the poor, especially the urban poor
[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

God OKC is just miles and miles of nothing. And the freeways there are perfectly straight. You have to constantly wonder if you've been shuffled off of the mortal plane into a hell where you just keep driving, endlessly, with no real destination or beauty in sight.

[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

[LOS ANGELES HAS ENTERED THE CHAT]

[–] copandballtorture@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

Jacksonville checking in

[–] Poison_Ivy@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

Houston is a lot worse than Los Angeles tbh as a person who has lived in both

[–] oregoncom@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I refuse to let you compare LA (urban sprawl) and Houston (a bunch of suburbs pretending to be a city).

[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

That's fair. Los Angeles is more like a bunch of cities in a trench coat anyways.

[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago

We eat your cities. We eat them all up.

[–] darkmode@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

congrats to chicago on becoming the largest city

[–] trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't follow. Lots of good cities are built on swamps.

[–] trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Part of the reason Houston resembles a bug splattered on the windshield of a car is because it is in a swamp.

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe like 5% of the reason. The main reason is because of motorist urban design. Otherwise Chicago, Berlin, Moscow, etc. etc. would be the same

[–] Magiccupcake@startrek.website 9 points 2 years ago

For what its worth, DC was also built on a swamp.

[–] StellarTabi@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

well that's a bunch of random giant ass-numbers, if you had the popular density with each city then it would mean something to me.

[–] ChapoKrautHaus@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Burger Reich - Endgame DLC

[–] Goblin@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Never realized Boston looks like a fucked up sniper rifle

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Looks like a fucked up map of Europe to me