31
submitted 1 year ago by Haus@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Officials are trying to understand why consumer spending, the job market and overall growth have not responded to the most aggressive interest rates in decades.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk 32 points 1 year ago

Another option to decrease spending is to increase taxes. That would of cause target the rich more, whereas increasing the interest rates is usually a benefit for the rich and hurts everyone else.

No wonder why increasing taxes instead of interest rates are never discussed to tackle inflation.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It's also vastly easier for the Fed to adjust interest rates than for Congress to adjust taxes.

Hell, it took them weeks to elect a speaker, could you imagine a debate over taxes!

[-] rifugee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

it took them weeks to elect a speaker

And the best they could come up with is Mike fucking Johnson.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That would of cause target the rich more

Though we should definitely raise taxes on the top 3 quintiles for a wide variety of reasons, your statement here is specifically why raising taxes to fight inflation doesn't really work.

The vast majority of consumer spending is non-discretionary

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Understandable. Nothing's worse for the economy than a strong economy. /s

Economics is basically voodoo, isn't it?

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Some of my worst grades were in Econ class because it’s really hard for me to get beyond the fact that the answers to Econ questions always have an asterisk at the end since we don’t know what the future will hold.

It’s like, yeah we say “all things equal” something should happen in a certain way. And in the vacuum of a classroom maybe that’s OK. But it’s really all just educated guesses. And really that’s the best that we can do, and maybe that’s just fine. But when I hear stuff like “economists predict [x]…” I kinda roll my eyes.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Economics 101 is like physics 101. It only makes sense in a vacuum, with no friction, and no vibration. Or to put it in economics terms, it only works with perfect consumer knowledge, no barriers to entry, and if the future is accurately predicted by the past.

So yeah, voodoo.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And as everyone knows, no actual economist learns anything more than econ 101

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

When consumer spending is very high, inflation continues to rise because there is not an increase in supply. (Consumers are spending more to effectively get almost the same amount of things as before).

This is, obviously, bad if unchecked.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

The Federal Reserve is like a cat that can't make up its mind about whether it wants to be inside or outside.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

Caveat: I'm no economist.

Despite the clear desire to see mass layoffs and unemployment so we will slow all our damn spending, the usual club to make that happen isn't working. Labor is strong. Support for unions is strong.

To explain this, I'd look at what has changed. I believe stock buybacks have been extremely high of late and that would be my guess. The big companies aren't leveraged so, just like how the rates aren't affecting recent home buyers who bought before the hike, they also aren't hurting companies as much as would normally be the case.

Another possibility is lingering effects of boomers taking COVID as a sign to retire, creating a labor shortage and putting pressure on companies not to have a layoff because they are worried they might have trouble re-hiring folks when the economy cools off.

If anyone else has ideas, I'd be curious. I might not be right about the cause, but I'm right about looking at what is different right now.

[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Since the article is quoting some of the top economists in the world, I would t let not being one really limit your options for commenting.

Here’smy hot take: economists have discussed sticky prices and sticky wages - which is a (imho) crappy way of describing effectively friction in economics. I wonder if what we are seeing here is sticky consumer spending. Normally we’d expect spending to react most quickly to interest rates and inflation, but people have gotten used to a certain level of spending and escalating debt, and so they might simply feel (or need to feel) unaffected by the fed changes.

Honestly, until we update the idea of an economic rational actor, I don’t think we’re going to get very far. In fact I think we risk getting further afield the longer we persist, and the more difficult it will finally be to realign everything.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Honestly, until we update the idea of an economic rational actor, I don’t think we’re going to get very far. In fact I think we risk getting further afield the longer we persist, and the more difficult it will finally be to realign everything

I agree. The idea of humans being rational is so divorced from reality it makes me wonder if economists know real people.

[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

To be fair, they don’t get invited to a lot of parties.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Another possibility is lingering effects of boomers taking COVID as a sign to retire, creating a labor shortage and putting pressure on companies not to have a layoff because they are worried they might have trouble re-hiring folks when the economy cools off

This is so rarely brought up and is such a massive fucking deal that it's criminal not to discuss it.

[-] Curiousfur@yiffit.net 11 points 1 year ago

I work because I don't have a choice and I spend my money because even saving 100% of my gross won't get me even remotely close to affording a house because they keep going up in price faster than my income does.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

If the people aren’t paid, and costs are up, then the 70% of the economy that is powered by spending will not be affected. Wild!

[-] msbeta1421@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I don’t believe historic models can accurately account for today’s level of globalisation.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

strong economy

Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

[-] AttackPanda@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

It’s a very strong economy just not for the bottom 90% of people.

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
31 points (89.7% liked)

News

23305 readers
5038 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS