830
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SARGEx117@lemmy.world 219 points 1 year ago

"we're not doing illegal, and no you can't check."

-People doing illegal things

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 149 points 1 year ago

How to tell you are running a cartel, step #1:

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

The cartel says the CIA shouldnt investigate cocaine prices.

[-] Unlocalhost@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Cocaine prices have made little to no change even though recessions, my friend tells me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 124 points 1 year ago

Internet providers say the FCC should not investigate broadband prices

And that's exactly why broadband prices should be investigated.

[-] TryingToEscapeTarkov@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Yeah they should do it even harder and faster now. Now I'm horny.

[-] Rememo@kbin.social 104 points 1 year ago

Make internet access a utility and be done with it.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Seriously. Why is this taking so long!? It’s painfully obvious!

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Because the ISPs don't want to have to do what we made them do for phone lines. Even though the trillion dollars we have given them over the last 30 years should have come with that stipulation...but they took that money and bought our politicians with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago

In my native country gigabit fiber internet is less than $9/mo. Broadband prices in the US are absolutely ridiculous.

[-] Otkaz@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Good God I pay 90 a month for 1 gig fiber. What county are you in?

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago
[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

W. H. A. T.

Sorry, it's so hard to believe, you have to explain how.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AirlineF0od@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

I pay 99.95 a month for 50 megs gotta love the local phone cmpny

[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That's Romania. But I live in the US now.

[-] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I pay 40€ a month for 250 MBit in Germany :(

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

50€ for 1000/1000 here. My employer covers it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I pay Comcast $130 for 1000/35

Just Internet, no bundles.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you can get the same internet speed for like 10$ in Ukraine. of 4$ for symmetrical 100mbps fiber connection

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

My three year old often says "Dad don't look!" When he does that, I know for a fact he's doing something he shouldn't be doing.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 67 points 1 year ago

The title alone is a great reason to investigate broadband prices.

[-] xyguy@startrek.website 60 points 1 year ago

Good thing broadband providers have such a stellar track record of nothing but honorable and consumer-benefiting behavior. I see no reason that we can't just trust that they have our best interests at heart.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

If any business tells the government that it should not look to closely into it's practices, then you know that there is something that needs to be brought to the light and corrected.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

It’s like a teenager telling their mom she doesn’t need to check the browser history

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Criminal doesn't want to be investigated.

[-] jmd_akbar@aussie.zone 47 points 1 year ago

Yup. Totally not a suspicious thing to say...

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

I agree, the FCC shouldn't waste time investigating broadband prices. Just nationalize them. And the rest of infrastructure.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Pay no attention to the piles of money behind the curtain!

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago

Serial killers say the FBI should stay out of their dark mysterious shed

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] db2@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 year ago

"We promise not to eat any more faces," said a spokeswolf for the Wolves Eating Faces Corporation.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

According to Marx, the capitalist will always dismiss all other concerns than their own gain, and will lie and murder for their ill-gotten gains.

The 21st century teems of examples

This week's Behind the Bastards (about the capture of Christianity by capitalism) tells about the exact same thing in the 1930s and 1940s (parallel with the rise of fascism). The same give us all the money push was happening tgen as now, only now the campaign is bigger.

Fuck these guys. They're no better than nineteenth century railroad tycoons

Edit 2024-01-14: Markup.

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, same podcast made the point in their episodes about the Hawk's Nest Tunnel Project, and how it was recent history even though it sounds like some medieval horror story. These fucks haven't changed, and the same company that profited off that brutality is still around and still making money hand over fist and never reckoned with their crimes.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Don’t try that Jedi shit on me it doesn’t work.

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago
[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago

Oh god the wipe transitions. I remember when the original trilogy was being remade into... I think the Gold version? I watched bts stuff and George was explaining how they'd added wipes to the scene transitions. Like, cool new CGI and all, but maybe adding wipes over the entire thing is kind of taking the piss.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I’ve been a big fan of my internet provider for not playing these games, until this year. Them: “ you owe more every month”, me: “you’re raising prices?”, them: “no, prices remain the same and you can continue on your existing plan, but you need to pay more”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rebul@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

"Trust me, the cheese is fine"- Mouse assigned to guard the cheese

[-] crypticthree@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago
[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

🤣🤣😅😅😅🤣🤣🤣 Not biased at all. I have a $20 price lock on spectrum ATM, but as soon as that ends I'm going to say goodbye and get 5G because I'm not paying $50 for fixed internet they have a monopoly in the area I've moved to.

[-] Joe-Blow240@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Methinks the corporation doth protest too much.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

I say the same thing to the police about my drugs

[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In 2021, Congress required the Federal Communications Commission to issue rules "preventing digital discrimination of access based on income level, race, ethnicity, color, religion, or national origin" within two years.

FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel last month released her draft plan to comply with the congressional mandate and scheduled a November 15 commission vote on adopting final rules.

Carr described Rosenworcel's proposal as "President Biden's plan to give the administrative state effective control of all Internet services and infrastructure in the US."

In a meeting with Rosenworcel's staff, cable company executives "stated that the Draft Order would impose overbroad liability standards that impede further broadband investment and are legally vulnerable by adopting a disparate impact rather than a disparate treatment liability approach," according to an ex parte filing submitted yesterday by cable lobby group NCTA-The Internet & Television Association.

The cable companies said the FCC "should define digital discrimination as disparate treatment and should limit the standard to policies and practices involving the deployment of broadband network facilities.

"Commission evaluation of price is unnecessary in the competitive wireless marketplace and may deter offering discounts and enticements to switch providers that consumers enjoy today."


The original article contains 688 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
830 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59710 readers
1823 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS