It's not like there's one person at the helm. It's a machine with diffuse decision making and responsibility.
That shields the people in charge from the horror of what they're doing, it reduces their personal exposure to risk, and it reduces the chance that they will even think about this scenario.
These people are fungible to the machine, so if they try to not screw over customers, they can be replaced by someone with less scruples and less awareness of what they're doing.
It's by the same guy that made The Stanley Parable, but it's more serious.
It's the same themes from Stanley Parable except made into an actual story instead of one long recurring joke.
I'm not saying the long recurring joke is bad - someone will probably hate that I said that - but they're just two different things that both do their different things very well. The Stanley Parable explicitly never builds to any kind of conclusion.
Lemmy isn't a monolith, and understanding that the fediverse has set itself up as an alternative to centralised platforms, I don't think we should be surprised when trolls who tend to get banned on those other platforms find their way here.
Of course we're going to see a lot of reactionary opinions here. These are the reactionaries that are too reactionary for reddit. They've learned to be less overt in their views because lemmy can excise a whole instance that's just reactionary.
I'd say right now they're trying to radicalise the normies. Vote manipulation is probably part of that strategy to make their views look more accepted than they are.
This unironically gave me a massive hit.
I've been showing my kid some hbomberguy videos, and they started with the new ones. When we went back a bit they were like, "wow, he looks so young".
It was completely the wrong way round to me, but I couldn't argue with it.
The commonality here is how expensive the things are. Scalping is another one of those things that's trashy if you're poor and classy if you're rich.
Such a good analogy. I'd go further and say all laws are like this. They don't actually stop anyone from doing anything, and they don't even guarantee anything will happen to them as a consequence. They're just lines on the road.
We have to kill him, or else he'll die!
That's not a gotcha, it's very simple. Doctors decide whether a fetus is viable outside the womb, and if it is, then it's a birth. The line for this keeps shifting earlier as neonatal medicine improves. Doctors aren't going to destroy a child that can live, they took a hypocratic oath. Once it's outside on its own, "my body my choice" no longer applies.
In fact, the opposite is frequently a problem, where enormous intervention is given to keep an extremely premature child alive when all you are doing is guaranteeing them a lot of suffering. There are plenty of parents who wish in retrospect that the option to simply not intervene had been offered, because they see how much pain their child goes through. It is already perfectly fine, legally and ethically, to decide that a child is simply too weak to have a good quality of life. You can offer them milk (if they feed on their own that is a sign of good health and probably won't ever happen with a case like this), but after that hold them and say goodbye.
People talking about late term abortions and killing babies after ripping them out of the womb at 40 weeks are completely divorced from reality. That's Alex Jones level bullshit.
Because bourgeois morality is false. Throw off the chains they have placed on your mind and become a based murderist.
Description: A very overexposed image of a girl staring open-mouthed into a bright, cloudy, night sky, mid-flash as it is lit up by a meteor.
Still image taken from this IG video: https://www.instagram.com/p/C7JcDGXtORH/
Longer, unedited version with original audio: https://www.instagram.com/p/C7LrNlCNOmR/
She just happened to catch this meteor and her own reaction to it, entirely by accident. Absolutely watch the video, the shadows playing through the clouds as the meteor passes through the frame are stunning, but the most remarkable thing to me is this moment where laughing with her friends is interrupted and she doesn't yet know where to look. It's such a universal reaction and really special to see. This image is taken as one of the very bright flashes is blowing out the camera. Some frames are almost entirely white, others look much clearer. I chose a frame to make the subject legible but also give a sense of how overwhelmingly bright the flashes really were.
Description: An iconified image of a space helmet, with text underneath reading:
MURDERING ALL CITIZENS IS NOT REQUIRED.
No context has been provided.
Description: picture of youtube poll, mostly text
Kyle Hill
Schrodinger's cat is:
Alive -- 50%
Dead -- 50%
42K votes
Comments
I love how this community knew exactly what to do.
description
Text: WARNING
Icon of eye and crossed-out alligator
Text: PSYCHOPERCEPTUAL HAZARD DO NOT HALLUCINATE ALLIGATORS
Image of person holding up hands defensively towards an alligator approaching them from the water
Text: oh shit oh no oh fuck why did you do that you've killed us all
Your story doesn't make a lot of sense, but there are a bunch of extra details that don't appear in either of the articles I've seen:
https://www.wptv.com/news/national/chris-gaither-11-year-old-boy-shoots-intruder-who-cried-like-a-baby
https://globalnews.ca/news/2675426/he-started-crying-like-a-little-baby-11-year-old-shoots-suspected-home-invader/
So if you want to discuss the story's details, maybe we should agree on those details, and you can give us something more than "trust me bro".
Also, eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable, and traumatic events make it even less reliable, and when you're talking about a kid it's even harder to get straight. I ask my kid what they said 10 seconds ago and they can't give me a straight answer. Maybe just fucking lay off the child. Jesus christ.