174
submitted 8 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

The smart home tech inside your home is less secure than you think, new Northeastern research finds.::A team of researchers discovered vulnerabilities in smart home devices made by big technology companies like Google.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 94 points 8 months ago

The S in IoT is for Security

[-] zatanas@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

This perfectly encompasses the situation.

[-] JaddedFauceet@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

So.. am I secured if I buy more than 1?

Yes but only during the full moon can Sailor Moon really keep you safe. Also, only when it's still in the box.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 74 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Idk, that seems exactly as secure as I thought.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 44 points 8 months ago

If you care about this, but still want smart home tech, look into Home Assistant and use local-only devices.

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I could also extend that to Tasmota or espHome. They are both open source firmware for IoT devices. They update regularly, and are unlikely to be completely abandoned without warning. While you can flash it to devices yourself, you can also buy a number of devices with it pre-installed.

While I still consider all IoT devices inherently insecure, and treat them as such, these are a lot better than the other random options out there.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 30 points 8 months ago
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

Joke's on you: I don't think it's secure and I don't have any!

[-] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago

no because its not in my home. good luck hacking my mechanical thermostat.

[-] ImTryingLemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Some skinny dude in a Guy Fawkes mask sneaks in through the dog door and turns up the heat while you're at work

[-] dankm@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

Where'd my kid get a Guy Fawkes mask?

Seriously, though, who cranks the thermostat to 30 and walks out the door?

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 8 months ago

The guy wearing a guy Fawkes mask. Didn't you listen?

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

86F for my fellow Americans.

[-] dankm@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Thanks for not just assuming I keep my house below freezing!

[-] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Point taken. But I don't go anywhere for work lol

[-] CrabLord@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Oh no, my good sir, not while you go into work.

While you're at work. If you're WFH, you could be staring at the door, that person is coming through the dog door anyway.

[-] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Mr. Doggy Man is going to get a stern lecture I can tell you

[-] 0ddysseus@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I can assure you, it is not.

[-] coolmojo@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Hypponen’s Law: If It’s Smart, It’s Vulnerable

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

It's as insecure as it appears to be...like I expected.

https://www.candlesmarthome.com/

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I just love when developers are so close to a project that they forget to even explain what the thing is. I see this all the time with interesting projects like this.

What is it? Some kind of network device?

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Looks like it’s a zigbee network device that is privacy forward, or something.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

I'm not overly convinced that anyone would be able to abuse any of my ghetto diy smart home gadgets

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

"who shut my tv off?!"

[-] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I know how insecure it is. Its always talking about how it feels sidelined and its feeling are hurt when I throw it in the trash.

[-] PopcornPrincess@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Sometimes it’s smart to be stupid…or I guess not smart with everything.

[-] Heavybell@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

The vast majority of this stuff should be called "dumb devices", as in "dumb terminal".

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 8 months ago

Couldn't possible be

[-] trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

I doubt that.

[-] PopcornPrincess@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sometimes it’s smart to be “stupid.”

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
174 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

57226 readers
4497 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS