this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
307 points (99.4% liked)

HistoryPorn

6980 readers
1086 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  4. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Illustrations

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 92 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That is the hair of a truly mad scientist.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, or a very nutty prof.

[–] madwifi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

or a very nutty Pet Detective in Asylum.

[–] MiDaBa@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Makes sense, they both have the same driving style.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It wasnt until this very moment that I realized I'd like to see a new Ace Ventura movie starring Jim Carey updated to match his years of experience of dramatic role expansion.

[–] Songar87@eviltoast.org 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

BLUE! 42! 42! Hut!

[–] Steve@startrek.website 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most if not all mad scientists are actually mad engineers.

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Depends if you're testing a mad hypothesis

[–] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's an interesting stage in development, too: bald on top, but still has the color. Maybe they're only a grumpy scientist?

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe it was an experiment gone explosively wrong

[–] stammi@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wikipedia says it's the son.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's also the reason my dad gave for his graying hair!

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Every time I see a monowheel vehicle, the driver is leaning out of it to see where he's going.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

The lat workouts are a feature, not a bug.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I feel like that would be the only way to turn

[–] Seraph@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"So you just conveniently stick your head out the side to see where you're- sputtered coughing from the swallowed bugs"

[–] madwifi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Don't have to deal with that nowadays!

[–] appel@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ngl, fully expected a clip from South Park.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The first thing I thought of was Mr Garrison in the wheel 😂

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago

Ok but that guy in the back clearly had the nicest design, just look at the dynamic in the lines on that wheel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My view on history because of my age and growing up as a nerdy only child of parents who came of age in the 1960's has given me a really crazy notion of how amazing the ideas technology driven advancements looks in that time period between 1900 and about 1980. Everyone from scientists, inventors, to authors, and directors seemed to really think we were going to be doing some amazing shit by the year 2000. Maybe not even particularly "better" shit, but amazing shit.

I guess I was just into my imagination and science fiction back then.

[–] DontMakeItTim@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What happens when you brake hard?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Exciting things, I would presume.

[–] tyrefyre@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just don’t understand why you have to control It with anus muscles

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Still better than going thru the airports

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's not a sphere tho...

[–] Eutermann@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's because you assume that it rolls, when in fact it spun!

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

The Gyroshere

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Shh, don't harsh his mellow, look how happy he is

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 2 years ago

Why does this dude look like a real life Syndrome?

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ok where do these airless tires keep going?

I feel like I've seen the concept work enough times on demonstrations that I'm justified wondering why I still gotta drag my butt to Mavis every few months

[–] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Imagine all the conveniences of a pressurized tire, but with terrible balance and constantly filling with dirt and debris. All those nooks and crannies, like an english muffin crossed with an out of balance washing machine.

They're great for off-road and heavy duty work applications.

They suck absolute ass on passenger cars.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Couldn't you resolve that by just covering the airless part? Like just because we don't have to inflate them anymore doesn't mean we need to constantly be seeing how not-inflated it is

[–] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Wouldn't that introduce a pretty big layer that can wear down? Any sort of fully opaque cover would have to be flexible to adapt to the road and I can't think of a material that isn't going to wear down from that, and at that point you're just back to inflated tires with extra steps, so you might as well use regular inflated tires.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Might be terrible wear and tear on the roads.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Of all the reasons to not have airless tires. This is the least likely answer.

If it were true - we wouldn't allow regular people to own Chevy 750 15,000 trucks to drive to their office jobs.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I mean tbch we probably shouldn't allow those big stinking trucks for people that don't have farm labor on the docket

[–] randomivysaur@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: next ›