this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2020
0 points (NaN% liked)

Main, home of the dope ass bear.

15965 readers
76 users here now

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!


gun-unity State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

guaido Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

smoker-on-the-balcony Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

frothingfash Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

just-a-theory An Amainzing Organizing Story

feminism Main Source for Feminism for Babies

data-revolutionary Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide


ussr-cry Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago)

China, while allowing explicit criticism of the government, usually censors and prohibits critiques specifically calling for an organized protest movement. (see this study for a more scholarly account of that) I imagine that this student, in calling for a climate strike without working through government channels, has triggered that requirement and is thereby by "censored" in a way. Agree or disagree with the tactic as you will, but it's how the CPC maintains control. By clamping down on protest movements that act outside normal channels, they hope to cut off avenues for movements to be co-opted by the Americans and other forces that would see China balkanized. The CPC is very happy for you to engage in criticism of their policies, so long as you do so from within the party and government apparatus. Working outside that apparatus is off limits, for better or worse.

[–] KiaKaha@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

This tweet goes into detail.

Basically, the Party’s onto the environmental stuff. It knows people want change. It’s making that change.

It’s declared a goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2060. There are huge subsidies for solar panels, and it’s the world’s largest exporter. It uses its military for huge reforestation efforts.

There’s no need for a western-seeded social movement telling them to do what they’re already doing.

[–] Classic_Agency@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (2 children)

It’s declared a goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2060.

Thats literally worse than most other countries who are pledging 2050, and aren't socialist.

Not only that but we need to be carbon neutral by 2030 at the latest or we are fucked.

[–] KiaKaha@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago (2 children)

They’re a developing nation, and well below their historical carbon budget per capita.

They’ve committed to peaking in 2030.

[–] ap1@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

that doesn't mean billions won't suffer long term because of the party not taking drastic immediate action. that being said, it's really mostly on the west and the global 1% not the majority of China.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

look the only way to curb their carbon and also make a significant dent to global warming is to nuke America.

[–] ap1@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

genociding native americans like a boss

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

I'm following your damn logic. The only factors they can handle are their own projected carbon emissions. America and other developed nations are worse polluters, per capita than China.

[–] ap1@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago) (1 children)

yes, a large amount of Chinese people live in poverty. Doesn't the mean the capitalist class of China aren't responsible for a considerable amount of carbon emissions, like the rest of the global 1%. Borders are stupid, don't compare per capita. Class analysis of emissions is really the only relevant analysis.

[–] Phosphophyllite@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

They’re a developing nation

Delusional

[–] KiaKaha@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago

Sure, the major cities are hot shit, but there are parts of China, especially rurally, where it’s all but a completely different country.

That’s why it’s still considered ‘developing’.

[–] Phosphophyllite@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

White imperialist moment shes obviously paid by cia

[–] ARVSPEX@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago

This person is a bad-faith shitposter, do not pay them any mind.