this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
303 points (100.0% liked)

196

17889 readers
70 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ummthatguy@startrek.website 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 years ago

fappa-fappa-fappa-fappa-fappa-fapppa-fappa

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago

"Arky" is an appropriately non-binary name.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Its a shame the skin tight unitards mever caught on with the fellas. Thats a dapper suit right there.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Beat sound to Nick’s blastin

Is that jerking off to gay porn?

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago

That would be molecules, I guess.

[–] tryplot@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

ah yes, the super futuristic and far off future of the year 2000

[–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Technically, the early 2050s. So there's still time.

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why am I getting the vibe that these predictions will still be wrong?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Have any of these predictions ever been right?

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Idk, probably.

[–] tryplot@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I mean, if you want a list, here you go

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why did we ever stop writing dumb puns on old cars?

Brb, keying "Racket Ship" onto mine really quick.

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 21 points 2 years ago

lol. no cooking after burners

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Both of them appear to have broken their spines

Her foot appears to be pointing at the car, her knee to the right of the image, her torso front-right, and her head facing left

His legs look like he's just started to turn towards the car but his body is still going straight on to the right

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

It's because they were "cooking with super-atomic radiation".

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sir I would like to remind you that humans can twist themselves at the waist.

Though in fairness there’s no way to balance the way she is depicted.

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I thought this was AI generated because of the terrible anatomy...

How does such a respected, experienced comic artist fuck up basic human forns this badly?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

'Where are her organs?'

At home.

Future!

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

I bet her check engine light is on.