248
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fisk400@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago

It's a bit sad that the democrats are so milk toast and ineffective in their messaging that even the slightest pushback against republicans is referred to as Dark Brandon.

[-] mephiska@kbin.social 68 points 1 year ago

milk toast

Is this sarcasm or do you not know the proper term?

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 149 points 1 year ago

Don't put yourself on a pedal stool like you know all the words in the world

[-] Redditgee@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago

Thanks for saying that. People like you are a blessing in the skies.

[-] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 1 year ago

Allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive porpoises I think you are wrong.

In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. If you don't tow the line you'll never hone in on the truth. Gorilla warfare will be used against you if you don't agree!

[-] SocializedHermit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

You had me at "zero taller ants".

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is just art, plain and simple.

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's a decades-old copypasta AFAIK. I do sometimes add new malapropisms as I come across them.

[-] teft@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

I hate you all. LOL. I thought I was having a stroke.

[-] boeman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

We don't need to know your self pleasure habits.

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, if you’ve got the time why not? I’m having a stroke right now.

[-] sensibilidades@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

that's a bit of a damp squid

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

All just to spider face…

[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago
[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Which, for whatever it's worth, was deliberately coined as 'milk + toast'.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

To be fair, there was a time recently when Trump used the term "milk toast" to describe Kayleigh McEnaney, so using the term "milk toast" isn't entirely unreasonable here if it's meant to be a dig at Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Linuto@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Language is fluid. The character named Milquetoast the expression comes from was based on the idea that milk and toast are a bland and uninteresting meal anyway. The idea is communicated either way.

[-] Fisk400@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Did not know. English is my second language and I have only heard it spoken. The weird part is that I have written it in comments before (on reddit) and nobody corrected me.

Also, it should be milk toast. Milquetoast is a reference to a comic character that is referencing the dish.

[-] theyresocool@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Al Gore was the canary in the coal mine for that party and generation. Milquetoast is being very polite.

[-] knightry@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Are we just going to ignore 8 years of Obama? You can have your differences with him but he was far from ineloquent.

[-] Books@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Agreed.

They should have never backed down on the Clinton comment calling them deplorable. They are.

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

What should we do with that half of the country then? I mean I agree, they are deplorable. But then what? They're not going anywhere. We're all in the same boat like it or not. Imo we HAVE to find a way to work together.

[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It's not half the country, It's like 30%. Trump did not win the popular vote and that was people who voted.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What is the measure of effective messaging? By my estimation, it would be winning elections, which progressives have a pretty poor record of.

[-] Ryumast3r@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

By my estimation it would be getting more votes, which democrats actually have a pretty good record of.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] sensibilidades@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I love that the 'Right Side Broadcasting Network' that is hosting the video of MTG has fully a quarter of its screen devoted to hawking gold.

[-] cmhickman358@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When you're referring to selling something it's spelled hocking.

Edit: Turns out I was mistaken, Hawking is indeed the correct term for this.

[-] sensibilidades@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I looked it up before posting, there's a bit of disagreement on that.

[-] cmhickman358@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh damn I had never heard of the other term before, my bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

https://brians.wsu.edu/2016/05/19/hock-hawk/

Think context matters here. In the context of the top comment, I think hawking is the proper term over hocking.

[-] cmhickman358@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh ok, I had never heard of that term before, I stand corrected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

"Know your audience."

[-] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Biden was trying to “finish what FDR started” in addressing rural poverty, education and medical care, Greene said. She also accused Biden of trying to turn America socialist.

"Socialist" is a good term to scare folks. (At least, folks over 50.) FDR...not so much.

[-] dx1@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This should fall below the threshold of "things worth posting or writing an article about" tbh.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Are you new to politics? This is the meat and potatoes of how politics is played.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
248 points (90.5% liked)

politics

18802 readers
5472 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS