That's after you already have a passkey. I don't think you can create a passkey without a different form of 2FA. At least...you shouldn't be able to, because that would kind of defeat the purpose.
GenderNeutralBro
Not really comparable. Passkeys don't replace 2FA. You need to bootstrap passkeys with 2FA.
I'm on Bazzite now. It certainly made my life easier as far as GPU drivers go.
However, be aware that it comes with its own learning curve. It's an "immutable" distro, and it has like half a dozen different ways to install software. You can't use dnf like you would on regular Fedora. The idea is to get apps from Flatpak, or use Distrobox, or use Homebrew — all things that run on top of the base OS so you can use a monolithic "immutable" OS image. There are pros and cons to this approach.
Once I familiarized myself with Distrobox (BoxBuddy makes this a lot easier) and using Flatseal to grant Flatpak apps direct access to the folders they need to operate (like my music library on an external drive, in the case of my music player), it's been pretty smooth sailing. But I do miss just being able to run sudo apt install <whatever>.
Well that sucks. You might be able to try "The Debian Way" mentioned here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Upgrades#The_Debian_way_of_upgrading
(Ubuntu is derived from Debian, which is why "the Debian way" works.)
The gist is to replace all instances of "noble" with "oracular" in your /etc/apt/sources.list file, then run some commands to do the distro upgrade.
It boils my blood how many people who ought to know better keep promoting the idea of human exceptionalism, when all evidence is to the contrary. I cannot count how many times a broadly accepted idea that "only humans can do " has been soundly disproven. And every time, it seems, one of two things happens:
- People outright ignore the evidence and keep parroting the same bullshit.
- They move on to some other arbitrary distinction that hasn't yet been disproven scientifically, but is obviously also bullshit.
Tool use, language, culture, and object permanence spring to mind. Lots of good research on various types of abstract thinking as well, with a wide range of animals from pigs to crows to octopuses to bees and more.
We've demonstrated that these "human" traits are NOT exclusive to the human species. In many cases they're not even exclusive to our genus, family, order, class, or phylum. (I half expect someone to tell me they're not exclusive to the animal kingdom, even; please share any relevant research on fungi or plants if you have it!)
At least we, as a society, have moved on from the "featherless biped" era.
I agree with you that it's just a convenient rationalisation, not a considered belief. I guess the idea of moving beyond human exceptionalism is a distant dream when we can't even move beyond racism and nationalism.
Cool. I could well be wrong about the double-step requirement. It sure sounds that way, but the Upgrade Notes page is very old so maybe it's easier now? Keep us posted!
On further investigation, it looks like you'd need to do an in-between upgrade to 24.10 before going to 25.04. I didn't realize that before. It's been a long time since I upgraded an Ubuntu system.
Here is the relevant documentation you'd need for upgrades:
From 24.04 to 24.10: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OracularUpgrades/#Upgrading_Ubuntu_Desktops_to_24.10
And then basically the same thing again to go from 24.10 to 25.04: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PluckyUpgrades#Upgrading_Ubuntu_Desktops_to_25.04
In case you're not familiar with Ubuntu's naming and update conventions, I'll explain briefly, because it's confusing for beginners: Each release has a name and number. The names loop through the alphabet in the format "Adjective Animal", and the numbers are the release date in format "year.month", with new releases every six months, in April and October. Then there are the "Long Term Support" (LTS) releases that are released every two years, matching the April "xx.04" main releases. You're currently on "Noble Numbat" (24.04), which is followed by "Oracular Oriole" (24.10) and "Plucky Puffin" (25.04). Totally intuitive, right?! -_-
OR you could back up your stuff and install a clean 25.04. I'm not sure if the installer has an option to retain an existing home folder. Again, it's been a long time since I used Ubuntu specifically. Perhaps someone with more recent experience can chime in.
You didn't mention which version of Ubuntu Studio you're running. Is it 24.04 LTS by any chance?
My initial thought is that you are probably running Wayland, and that your version of Ubuntu has KDE Plasma 5 instead of 6 and/or outdated Nvidia drivers that don't work super well with Wayland.
A quick search shows that this is all default on Ubuntu Studio 24.04 LTS, which is the first version you'll find at ubuntustudio.org. :(
Ubuntu 25.04 (non-LTS) has Plasma 6, which is a very important upgrade if you are using Wayland, especially with Nvidia GPUs.
Just a guess. If I'm right, you have a few choices:
-
Upgrade to Ubuntu Studio 25.04 (non-LTS). It has newer stuff like Plasma 6 that fixes a LOT of problems like this.
-
Switch to X11 instead of Wayland. This will likely introduce a new set of problems though. X11 has no future.
-
Switch to a different DE than KDE. I am not sure what is best in this situation.
-
Install the latest Nvidia drivers manually instead of getting them from the Ubuntu repo.
Option 1 is by far the simplest choice.
The Linux desktop is in a big transitional phase these past few years, as more distros default to Wayland even before a lot of their packages are updated to fully support it. It's a terrible time to be stuck with outdated "LTS" distros. This is why I hopped away from Debian 12 (13 is out now so yay, but it was a year too late for me).
The author pronounces it [aɡe̞] with a hard g, like GIF
LOL
And that e is the mid front unrounded vowel, of course.
I remember when some company started advertising "BURN-proof" CD-R drives and thinking that was a really dumb phrase, because literally nobody shortened "buffer underrun" to "BURN", and because, you know, "burning" was the entire point of a CD-R drive.
It worked though. Buffer underruns weren't a problem on the later generations of drives. I still never burned at max speed on those though. Felt like asking for trouble to burn a disc at 52x or whatever they maxed out at. At that point it was the difference between 1.5 minutes and 4 minutes or something like that. I was never in that big a rush.
I don't think it's fair to call all those "not serious" just because they had some cheesy aspects, especially when in some cases it was just in the B plot.
That was my first thought. It's been a long time since I hit a dead zone, with the sole exception of national parks. I wouldn't pay extra for that, but it would be nice to be able to contact my traveling companions if we ever split up.
Compared to ~10 years ago, it's a different world. Back then, I'd hit dead zones pretty much anytime I left a major city.