[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World,

This looks excellent -- thank you!

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

Thank you for your response!

What I meant was that their analysis felt like it complicated traditionally marxist positions, eschewing the deterministic trajectory of history (not a bad thing) and being concerned more with the characteristics of individual freedom within early societies rather than more causal 'class-like' elements that constrain or enable that freedom. While their problematization of centralized hierarchical states does seem to echo the more utopian visions of a post-socialist, communist society, in our given time and in the context of problems of a global scale, it seems appropriate to be skeptical when these past observations start to turn into present prescriptions for adopting 'flexible and creative' forms of organization that have, in the last century, been ineffective at challenging power or ushering in meaningful and lasting alternatives. If you do have a chance to read it, though, I would recommend it.

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

Michael Hudson

I thought he only wrote about contemporary economics; I'm now looking into his book on debt forgiveness in the bronze age, which looks a bit 'over-specific' but nonetheless quite relevant to the era I'm asking about -- thank you for the recommendation!

31
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Wordplay@hexbear.net to c/main@hexbear.net

I've been working on a multi-year project to closely read and comprehensively annotate significant writings in the history of philosophy up to the end of the 20th century. Being able to teach this material at a high level, and to critically evaluate and engage with contemporary critical theory, are the two attractors at which this project is aimed, so writings outside of the traditional western analytic canon of philosophy have been included (from Adorno to Zhuangzi).

However, in the last few months I've come to realize that what is missing from this attempt at a comprehensive engagement with the history of philosophy is a historical lens that can help situate these thinkers and their writings in their material, historical contexts. By reading these thinkers mostly chronologically, I'm at a vantage where I can see how many of these thinkers are in dialogue with their predecessors, but this alone is insufficient for understanding their intellectual production and thought, since it misses how such production might be the outgrowth of the particular material conditions permeating their existence. (I'm thinking here of Adam Smith theorizing about an already nascent capitalism; John Locke theorizing about liberalized monarchies after the English revolution of England, etc.)

So this set me in search of complementary material histories that I could pair with the various periods within my project. Materialist histories like Arrighi's The Long Twentieth Century, E.P. Thompson's The Making of the English Working Class, The Long 19th Century (Hobsbawm), and even this reddit post which sums up how the Holocaust can be effectively explained by a marxian approach; all of these clearly back-up Marx's bold claim found in the title of this post, at least for the last five centuries.

However, I have yet to find anything quite as accomplished or detailed for the preceding millennia (something like "A People's History of the World" would be a vulgar approximation; and Graeber and Wengrow's Dawn of Everything seem to intentionally sidestep a marxist account of pre-history in favour of an anarchist flavour).

My question is -- why? If historical materialism bears so much explanatory fruit, why isn't there an accomplished comprehensive account of all hitherto existing society? Plate tectonics, for example, was a theory that gave us an entire history of the earth; evolution, an entire history of life; where is the marxian retrospective? Is it a problem of evidence? A limitation of the medium (i.e. history is too complex and particular to be distilled into one book or one series)? Where is the compendium for the immortal science?

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago

With the recent surge of hype around AI Music and sites like Suno and Udio, I thought I would make a post discussing AI music, some tips, and critiques to be had. It also showcases some genre-mixed music that sounds alright.

Not really sure if this will have major implications for mainstream pop music... everything already feels derivative and focus grouped to shit lol

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

Also, the Suno wiki is a decent source for prompt guidance.

15
AI Music thoughts (hexbear.net)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Wordplay@hexbear.net to c/music@hexbear.net

Since AI Music platforms like Udio and Suno have been getting a lot of attention lately, I wanted to get some Hexbears' opinions on the matter. Have any of you been testing the capabilities of these? Care to share what you've made?

Udio seems to be trained on a wider range of niche genres, which I think leads to more diverse sounds that are better at obscuring their AI origins. Suno has a much more limited mainstream range, but you can make an entire concept album by extending clips multiple times before you 'get the whole song'. You can also finely tune each clip by choosing to extend it very early into the clip to pick out the best parts (though at that point, why not just make the music yourself?)

So far I've been using Udio to get more diverse samples, combined with an AI music splitter to isolate the good parts. I then plug them into Suno-generated long tracks to augment limitations from the prompting process. The music still isn't great (and my editing skills are dirt poor) but I think interesting things can get created this way. Soundcloud link to some example tracks

Adam Neely just released a decent video about AI music and what it lacks, and so even though the critique of capitalist art production that he suggests is pretty milquetoast, I'd recommend it as a mild antidote to all the AI music hype.

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

Jacques Pauwels has a good book detailing both how the Allies' second front was indeed an attempt at capitalizing off of an inevitable Soviet victory (and mitigating Soviet influence in Western Europe in the aftermath), and also how little resistance the Allies faced on the Western Front because German soldiers were terrified of the Soviets and fled west to surrender/be protected by to the allies.

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 50 points 7 months ago

The pandemic is class warfare

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 32 points 9 months ago

I'm in a town where basic shelter is unaffordable and constantly features puff pieces about the plights of our landlords, and the local subreddit has the majority of locals calling landlords parasites. All that's missing is a vanguard that can organize and guide this sentiment.

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 13 points 10 months ago

Always bring a steward.

HR's first impulse when receiving a serious sexual harassment complaint from my coworker was to reframe everything my coworker said in the most downplayed way. Like a, "oh shit this is serious. . . how do I get this employee to make it sound like it wasn't a big deal". Inhuman Resources indeed.

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago
0
submitted 2 years ago by Wordplay@hexbear.net to c/history@hexbear.net

Can someone please recommend me some reading or watching that isn't entirely infused with cold war rancor towards the USSR?

view more: next ›

Wordplay

joined 3 years ago