138

More like resouce deez nuts

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GriffithDidNothingWrong@hexbear.net 49 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

HR people are incredibly useful. They're the first line of defense in protecting the company from litigation. Their worth to you is entirely dependent on whether or not you own a company

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 49 points 11 months ago

Even the department name "Human Resources" is part of the liberal dehumanization process. Notice how the more techbros call things "human" the more dehumanizing and inhumane their actual perspective and intent is? It's not new, and it's at least as old as "Human Resources."

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago

That's why you're seeing more and more departments calling themselves the "people team". Like changing your name makes you less of a ghoul

[-] macabrett@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago

It felt even more gross when my workplace did this for about five years tbh. They changed it back to Human Resources recently lol

[-] sping 17 points 11 months ago

They used to be "Personnel".

[-] charlie@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Side effect of business structure being taken from military structure. Still called Personnel in the military, and even Human Resources has been getting rebranded lately. Same shit though

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 17 points 11 months ago

Yeah, it's still gross, but in some ways, when some techbro talks about enhancing the human connection so humans can better communicate with their fellow humans so humans can be better humans in a more human community, it's a helpful tell just how alien that shit sounds after while.

[-] ProfessorAdonisCnut@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago

Australia renamed the "Department of Human Services" to "Services Australia" a few years ago

[-] FactuallyUnscrupulou@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago

My HR team is called the people department.

[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 11 months ago

I hate techbros as much as anyone, but I think calling the department "Human Resources" predates them by a lot.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago

I didn't say otherwise. I said it's part of the liberal dehumanization process. Techbros are only the most recent wave of that process.

[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 11 months ago

The company I work for is wise to the connotation of "human resources" and opted to call the department "people experience". Now that's techbro.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

That's still creepy and fucked up, but it'd feel like salt in a wound if they still had some bullshit up about "connecting humans to humans to make all humans into better humans" or the like.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

The last 2 big tech companies I worked have renamed HR to "people Ops (Operations)" now for the cleaner image despite having the exact same role profile

Now that's tech bro

[-] sping 7 points 11 months ago

In my world it came in during the 90s, concurrent with early tech expansion. Before that it was called Personnel.

[-] asg101@hexbear.net 35 points 11 months ago

They do their masters' bidding.

Spoiler alert: YOU are not their master.

[-] cosecantphi@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

How do HR people have friends or any sort of personal relationship whatsoever outside of family?

If I found out a friend of mine was working as a fucking HR person, I'd probably never talk to them again. I can't imagine there aren't literally millions upon millions of other working class people who feel the same way. They aren't as bad as landlords, but wow are they up there.

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago

They would never personally associate with the peasantry

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Okay maybe it's cause I'm a liberal but have you talked to HR people irl? They're not any worse than other libs outside their job and are pretty normal (relative to other libs)

[-] cosecantphi@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

Well, it really has nothing to do with how nice they are outside of work. I'd be disgusted to associate with anyone who has made a career out of treating working people like livestock.

[-] FanonFan@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

my limited experience is they tend to exude a "fake nice" aura that I don't tolerate

similar to mormons

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago

HR is worse than worthless. They're just a way to further divy up blame and surveillance roles previously taken on by the owner class in exchange for careerism (same reason management exists). Have a problem? Don't organize with your coworkers, go to HR, they'll "fix" it (do exactly what the owner wants using the info you provide). Bad news about those raises we promised? HR will deliver it with faux-sympathy.

[-] AFineWayToDie@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

The only purpose of Human Resources is to protect companies from their workers.

[-] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago

hr people are just cops, they can get in the sea tbh

Death to America

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago

They're very useful to the company. They are not on your side though as a worker. They are effectively the prosecution, state's attorneys and you are the one on trial. Talking to HR is like talking to cops, it can only hurt you but cannot help you. If your workplace is unionized, demand a steward be present at any disciplinary meeting. That's your defense lawyer, and they won't be present unless you exercise your rights.

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

Always bring a steward.

HR's first impulse when receiving a serious sexual harassment complaint from my coworker was to reframe everything my coworker said in the most downplayed way. Like a, "oh shit this is serious. . . how do I get this employee to make it sound like it wasn't a big deal". Inhuman Resources indeed.

[-] rake_in_lake@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Like LGB, hr needs the T

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

No shit, Sherlock, aren't they just the PMCs (Professional Managerial Classes)

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago

No, they're more like cops in the sense they protect the capital and interests of the company against its subjects

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

Yep, they're agents of capital.

This is why the "1%" rhetoric from Berniecrats and soc dems is a bit misleading. It's not just 1% of the population heavily invested in protecting capital and perpetuating the capitalist system, it's closer to something like 30-40% when you include all the petty bourgies (small business owners, landlords), the agents of capital (cops, feds, organized crime, military, upper management, media class) & brainwashed class traitors (militias, lumpen, reactionary proles).

If there ever is a communist revolution in the US, there's going to be WAY more reactionaries and counter-revolutionaries than 1% of the population (which is still 3.5 million people by the way). Anyone who doesn't think we'll need gulags is kidding themselves.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I would include the bourgeois proletariat (description of many of the English working class around the 20-30s by Lenin) as well; The ones that are of genuine worker class but because they make so much money, they stand to gain from imperialism as they have the wealth to heavily take advantage of the currency and dirt cheap raw resources and labor

[-] D61@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

bourgeois proletariat

tito-huh

Is.. is that a thing?

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago
[-] D61@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

oohhh.... Okay... its one of those "the poorest people in the richest country are rich compared to the poorest people in the poorest country" thing.

[-] MineDayOff@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

Don't trust the HRs, they will betray you

[-] MerryChristmas@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

We used to have an HR department until the one lady who was the department retired. She mostly just reset people's passwords for them. Now that we don't have an HR department, they just give us admin rights on our machines so we can reset our own passwords. Automation is coming for us all.

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago

Isn't that IT? That's not what HR is supposed to do?

[-] D61@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

If their employer has outsourced most of the traditional HR stuff... then yeah. They were just holding on to an employee in a position about to get cut, until they retired.

[-] MerryChristmas@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There has never been an IT department but I guess at one point she was young and computer literate.

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

they just give us admin rights on our machines so we can reset our own passwords

Just wait until some boomer clicks on the link they got in an email from support.mlcrosoft.com sicko-blur

[-] MerryChristmas@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

It has happened. We got a mandatory training course afterward with some multiple choice quiz, so I think we are safe now.

[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

what do you mean?

they are accomplishing their role which is being worthless

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
138 points (98.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13418 readers
913 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS