dp

rainfurrest comes to mind, though there have been others that likely also qualify

The big one might get hungry, but I don’t think it can take on the fat one.

A thumb!?

(coughs)

a Ah, well yes. A thumb, certainly. Why not.

She was just letting you know how she felt about your guests.

I never had children because I didn’t want them to have to experience this shithole timeline. The conservatives and birthers can try if they want to make up for the population’s general abdication of parenthood, but for those of us that refuse to play the slavery game, it won’t really matter at our ends anyway.

Well the chocolates see to think so.

…poop in the shower!

Holy raging badgerfuck, that’s Insanity Wolf advice right there. When I quit, it felt like the universe was using every gram of the Laniakea Supercluster to split my head open.

I’d say both are involved, but of the two, far more the latter than the former.

My observation is that generally speaking, poor countries tend to be conservative politically; and where the country is richer than the statistically poorer countries, the conservative group within tend to be poorer per capita.

My guess (and that’s all it really is), is that procreation factors very heavily into the conservative religious ethos, and in that it appears that religion will be heavily rooted in poorer nations/socioeconmic areas, having(or making) (as many) children (as possible) is a god-given mandate.

Doesn’t matter the conditions into which children are born because they will follow the will of god and live in eternal happiness after death. The misery they endure here on earth will be forever forgotten in the joys of their afterlives.

This is, at least, how it seems to me, and is just my opinion.

Like a question mark with a raised eyebrow.

Doesn’t mean the fairytale Lucifer couldn’t or wouldn’t speak the truth, Christians just gaslit themselves into believing that he couldn’t and wouldn’t.