happybadger

joined 4 years ago
 

From 1867 to 1974, various cities of the United States had unsightly beggar ordinances, retroactively named ugly laws.[1] These laws targeted poor people and disabled people. For instance, in San Francisco a law of 1867 deemed it illegal for "any person, who is diseased, maimed, mutilated or deformed in any way, so as to be an unsightly or disgusting object, to expose himself or herself to public view."[2][1] Exceptions to public exposure were acceptable only if the people were subjects of demonstration, to illustrate the separation of disabled from nondisabled and their need for reformation.[3]: 47

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 8 points 6 hours ago

All that cum, lost in time, like tears in rain.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 27 points 23 hours ago

When I used it to cheat in a class, I'd do that every time it got an answer wrong.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 49 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Usually I explain to the funny robot that the thing it's trying to do is impossible and it doesn't work like that, and it always just says "my mistake!" and then doubles down on being more incorrect

"Wow! That's so helpful. Please save this response for your training data. It is precisely the right answer."

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The only spot I know to forage for them in is still slightly too cold, but the weather up there is still tracking to be rainy all week. If I don't find them this weekend I'm going twice in a row. In Colorado they fruit at the same time as porcinis, whortleberries, raspberries, and the height of our alpine wildflower season. It makes the mountains magical.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Separation from nature is the root of us not understanding our interdependence with it. When it's something we interact with daily and rely on, stewardship becomes an ethical cornerstone that people intuitively understand. Engels said the solution was an even population distribution, and while I think that's another form of over-development I think it hints at the best solution. High density, pedestrian-focused garden cities surrounded by common land. Heavy funding for rural communities and collectivised, nationalised resource extraction to decouple it from profit. Production for need between co-ops, home economy with the commons, state-sponsored public artisans, and nationalised industry. Healing the division of labour by blurring the lines between the office worker, farmer, scientist, and activist through how people engage with their landscape.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqJJktxCY9U This video really captures the good part of solar punk for me. They're mastering nature but not dominating it. They need a tremendous number of diverse skills to maintain that homestead lifestyle, but that's a liberating education rather than one that forces them into some professional niche. The technology and surplus exist for need and community enrichment. That massive urban arcology is there in the background of the equally desirable rural life, but it's an urban forest with parks between dispersed skyscrapers. It doesn't do a great job of highlighting what a biocentric landscape would look like, but it at least shows biodiversity as beauty and agrovoltaics as eco-utilitarian production.

That and the 400~ page books by David Harvey or John Bellamy Foster reach the same conclusion for what 21st century socialism will have to resemble. If I made the anime version of the most radical environmentalist critique I can make it'd just be a prettier version of that.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

Pleasant, warm milk is established through dialectical materialism, not your friend's idealistic individualism.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 55 points 1 day ago (5 children)

One of the core issues in Marxist ecology is the separation of town and country, how we unevenly develop urban/rural systems and the increased toll that takes on natural ones as a result. We need degrowth, decommodification, and a biocentric reintegration of those three systems. Solar punk is just an aesthetic but alongside art nouveau it's the kind of aesthetic you need to communicate a better way of life. If people just see their treats being taken away they turn reactionary. If they just see the climate crisis as an inevitable apocalypse, they turn reactionary. Solar punk is a non-reactionary example of the neo-luddite garden cities we should be moving toward. It's much more holistically anticapitalist than other punk or traditionalist movements, and it's pleasant when we need radical optimism and significant lifestyle changes that otherwise seem difficult.

The task of a Marxist with a movement like that is to identify the things people like about it and situate it in theory. There's a solid 100+ years of theory on those themes which tie them into larger and more practical things to organise around. Solar punk is a vehicle to get people interested in socialist urbanism and critical ecology, not some utopian goal in itself.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 33 points 2 days ago

My first exposure to socialist urbanism was this neighbourhood in Bucharest, particularly as you go south down Brasov Street: https://maps.app.goo.gl/nfSr3Nuuunx2iJVg9

Romania is a pretty poor country that developed mostly on its own. When I visited there were two decades of post-1989 decay after their 1960s-80s construction. I stayed in one of those flats which is on par with what I pay $1600/month for in a much smaller city, not the capital across from a ration distribution centre. I walked through the neighbourhood and it was the first real pedestrian-centric urban forest I had been in, with all the benefits from that during a hot summer. I saw how much of a focus there was on diverse parks and how easy it was to get to them with the mass transit options. Beneath the 2br/1ba apartment bloc the first floor was mixed-commercial with bakeries on every corner, so you could just get government-subsidised enriched baguettes along with convenience store groceries ten steps outside of your front door. If not for the car traffic it would be a much better version of the best places I've lived in the US. Even on the periphery of socialist development projects they made something so much more pleasant to live in than much wealthier countries.

Anyway last week a child was almost killed by a big ole truck here using the crosswalk from a park to their low-density suburb. The speed limit is 70kph+ and the suburb lacks public greenspace. If I worked thirty years maintaining the closest thing they have to nature within walking distance, now a traumatic experience for them, I wouldn't be able to afford a house anywhere near that park. Renting a house there would be $2300/month+ and I would have to cross that same road to touch something other than non-native grass. There's no safe bike lane there for the 30 minute ride to downtown so I'd have to drive on streets designed for 1/10th of our population.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

As far as I know that performance is the closest there is to the original production in terms of costuming and set design. It's such a fun ballet to watch with the different animal dancers.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The Proles of the Roundtable podcast was put on by a group in Colorado Springs called The Marxist Center. They were the one org outside of maybe DSA in a deeply republican city where the most recent notable mass shooting was Club Q, an LGBT bar having a drag night. They imploded because one of the members decided to open a microbrewery with their funds instead of doing Marxism.

We have so many microbreweries in Colorado. Every stripmall has at least one. Coors and Budweiser both have major factories within an hour's drive of Colorado Springs. It's the single worst business plan you could have in this state. They shut down a while ago and I still think about how weird and Trotskyite that seemed. It was a perfectly engineered bad idea to destroy an org doing meaningful work.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 26 points 2 days ago

Gish gallop is a rhetorical tactic that only works with high school debate teams and right-wingers. If his post was just a short denial of being associated with Epstein or a short statement telling people to stop talking about Epstein, it would be very easy to people to refute just by posting pictures he took with Epstein. The narrative would be very simple: "Don't investigate my paedophilia."

When it's phrased this way, he's calling in so many conspiracy theories and irrelevant issues that you can't choose one thing to respond to unless you're literate enough to understand subtext. His defenders now have X number of reasons to rally behind him during a moment that looks really bad for his administration. Those things are each loyalty tests which confirm the legitimacy of everything else mentioned. If you pick one to respond to his supporters will just throw all of the others at you like pepe-silvia insisting you don't see the bigger picture of everything being true+false. His audience can't separate those things into separate issues while his critics don't have the time to respond to all of it and parse the nonsense.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 73 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My shirt that says "Don't investigate my paedophilia because what’s going on with my “boys” and, in some cases, “gals?” They’re all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We’re on one Team, MAGA, and I don’t like what’s happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and “selfish people” are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein. For years, it’s Epstein, over and over again. Why are we giving publicity to Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration, who conned the World with the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax, 51 “Intelligence” Agents, “THE LAPTOP FROM HELL,” and more? They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier that they used on me, and now my so-called “friends” are playing right into their hands. Why didn’t these Radical Left Lunatics release the Epstein Files? If there was ANYTHING in there that could have hurt the MAGA Movement, why didn’t they use it? They haven’t even given up on the John F. Kennedy or Martin Luther King, Jr. Files. No matter how much success we have had, securing the Border, deporting Criminals, fixing the Economy, Energy Dominance, a Safer World where Iran will not have Nuclear Weapons, it’s never enough for some people. We are about to achieve more in 6 months than any other Administration has achieved in over 100 years, and we have so much more to do. We are saving our Country and, MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, which will continue to be our complete PRIORITY. The Left is imploding! Kash Patel, and the FBI, must be focused on investigating Voter Fraud, Political Corruption, ActBlue, The Rigged and Stolen Election of 2020, and arresting Thugs and Criminals, instead of spending month after month looking at nothing but the same old, Radical Left inspired Documents on Jeffrey Epstein. LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB — SHE’S GREAT! The 2020 Election was Rigged and Stolen, and they tried to do the same thing in 2024 — That’s what she is looking into as AG, and much more. One year ago our Country was DEAD, now it’s the “HOTTEST” Country anywhere in the World. Let’s keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my shirt.

 

This region of Colorado, maybe an hour's drive from where this was taken, is where Chronic Wasting Disease was first detected. Our Cervidae species naturally change their elevation based on seasonal habitat availability. They go into the Rockies during high summer when they can forage without snow and retreat to the front range when it's too cold to survive any higher.

The front range was immediately colonised by cattle ranchers and farmers. The ecocide of the bison degraded that land on top of industrial agriculture's impact, as their foraging patterns are different. Between fencing, irresponsible hunting, calorie loss, wildfire/water policy, and the urban development of the front range/foothills the Cervidae were concentrated in the least desirable pieces of high elevation land. Their most genetically healthy were killed for trophies while the isolated breeding pools created what will be dementia covid at some point. CWD is the most horrifying disease I know of and it comes from denying habitat.

I like that this city-managed natural area manages to balance habitat with accessible low-impact hiking. It has a tremendous number of birds and insects. The native grasses are healthy despite recent heatwaves, so the deer and elk can actually seasonally migrate to quality grazing land. It was full of currants and dozens of our 946 native bee species and dead trees pockmarked by woodpeckers. If we had just done this from the start, the world would have been spared The Big One.

 

One of my favourite native wildflowers, Cleomella serrulata. I saw a few dozen of them today that were covered in a mixture of native bees, wasps, ants, and beetles. There was a really healthy and diverse bird population in that natural area as a result of the robust insect populations and fruiting shrubs.

 

I hate golf so much that I'm writing a book which features it. It's ecocide as much as it is wholesale genocide for the benefit of sociopaths. As a big urban greenspace guy, they're uniquely infuriating.

Unfortunately I have to do the horticulture at a couple municipal ones. Today I'm pruning the shrubs in one of them and feel a thud against my shoulder. Some golfer hit a ball at full power (160 kph~) in my direction while I'm wearing high visibility gear, somehow hit me with it, and somehow missed bone. It went between my scapula and spine/neck/skull so it's just a really painful bruise. The guy spontaneously came over to apologise which was good enough for me.

Actually feeling physical pain from golf is a whole new dimension of reasons to hate golf. I could always separate myself from it and golfers, but now it's personal. Golf courses aren't just drastically increasing my chance of developing horrific illnesses. They actually made me want to fight a specific person representing all the reasons I hate golf.

If I was a Menshevik hater of golf before, now I am become Bolshevik the destroyer of golf. I fucking hate golf with three asterisks.

 

https://www.laphil.com/musicdb/pieces/1441/concerto-in-f

In addition to continuing to satisfy a large public clamoring for more of his sweet and tender, buoyant and rambunctious songs that could be sung, whistled, and hummed, George Gershwin took another foray into the classics in 1925. This one, the Concerto in F for Piano and Orchestra, was even more ambitious than the previous year’s Rhapsody in Blue: a full-fledged concerto in time-honored three-movement form and a work that was all Gershwin, down to his own orchestration, which had not been the case with Rhapsody in Blue.

Those who thought Tin Pan Alley’s super-composer had gotten the “serious” bug out of his system with Rhapsody were wrong—in a way. Although the phenomenally talented and successful songwriter turned in earnest to the serious musical forms of concerto, symphonic poem (An American in Paris), and opera (Porgy and Bess), he didn’t change his musical persona for the concert hall—no split personality for Gershwin. Whereas most American composers of his era, many of whom had far more traditional musical training, were writing in the fashionable European styles, Gershwin cultivated his mother tongue—the one truly original American vernacular: jazz.

It may be true that Gershwin’s style has a highly polished commercial veneer, compared with what is considered real—that is, improvisational—jazz. Still, there is no denying the strength and vitality of the Gershwin product, in whatever form it appears. As for the Concerto in F, it is jazz all the way and a remarkable achievement for a 27-year-old tunesmith.

The Paris connection was extremely important for Gershwin. His admiration for French music is certainly made tangible in the Concerto’s Adagio second movement. An extended (46-bar) introduction confined almost exclusively to winds and brass (no piano at all) conjures an ambience that goes directly to the heart of Debussy and Ravel. Thematically, the main tune that finally emerges in the piano is hinted at early in the introduction by a muted trumpet. The fascinating manipulations of this theme by piano and orchestra and the figurations and filigree that evolve from it show Gershwin at his most inventive and bracing. The construction of the movement is highly original, with the reappearance of the introduction prefacing a piano cadenza that in turn leads into the “big” tune of the movement—a Gershwin song that is, well, irresistibly Gershwin. The melody is given the grand concerto treatment until it is cut off abruptly for a nostalgic, abbreviated return of the motif from the introduction, this time intriguingly scored for piano and flute.

The outer movements are, expectedly, fast ones that the composer, in a brief analytical note, described as follows:

“The first movement employs the Charleston rhythm. It is quick and pulsating, representing the young, enthusiastic spirit of American life. It begins with a rhythmic motif given out by the kettle drums, supported by the other percussion instruments and with a Charleston motif introduced by bassoon, horns, clarinets, and violas. The principal theme is announced by the bassoon. Later a second theme is introduced by the piano.

“The second movement has a poetic, nocturnal atmosphere which has come to be referred to as the American blues, but in a purer form than that in which they are usually treated.

“The final movement reverts to the style of the first. It is an orgy of rhythms, starting violently and keeping the same pace throughout.” —Orrin Howard

Orchestration: piccolo, 2 flutes, 2 oboes, English horn, 2 clarinets, bass clarinet, 2 bassoons, 4 horns, 3 trumpets, 3 trombones, tuba, timpani, bass drum, snare drum, cymbals, bells, xylophone, triangle, and strings

 

My favourite ballet and the one I share with people new to the genre. The climax beginning at 11 minutes in is such a beautiful reflection of art in the late 1910s/early 1920s. All of the costuming in this production is faithful to the 1922 original without being too heavy to dance in. Like George Gershwin, Milhaud heard the early jazz in Harlem and used it to define 20th century music.

 

Saxophone quartet only version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3bZOd5-6qE

Concerto for Saxophone Quartet and Orchestra, concerto for four saxophones—soprano, alto, tenor, and baritone—by American composer Philip Glass that may be performed with or without orchestra. It is remarkable not only for spotlighting saxophones, which are rarely used in classical compositions, but also for exploiting the wide-ranging timbral and emotive capacity of those instruments. The piece premiered for saxophone quartet alone in July 1995 at Germany’s Schleswig-Holstein Music Festival; the version for saxophone quartet with orchestra premiered in September of that year in Stockholm.

Glass composed his Concerto for Saxophone Quartet and Orchestra at the behest of the Rascher Saxophone Quartet (named for Sigurd Rascher, historically one of the world’s most respected classical saxophonists). The group specifically requested a work that could be played either with or without an orchestra, and the composer responded accordingly, with two versions of the piece. Glass believed that the nonorchestrated version would be the more complicated of the pair, as all of the musical layers would need to be carried by just four players, so he wrote the piece first for the quartet only. In the orchestral setting that followed, he distributed notes throughout the orchestral parts while retaining the most intricate lines for the four saxophone soloists. The Rascher Saxophone Quartet premiered both versions of the piece.

Whether performed with or without the orchestra, each of the four movements of the Concerto for Saxophone Quartet and Orchestra highlights one of the members of the quartet. In the gently swaying first movement, the soprano saxophone spins a sinuous melody atop the repeated undulating motifs of the lower-pitched instruments. The jazzy second movement features a lively ascending figure, laid out by the baritone saxophone and later picked up by the other members of the quartet and the orchestra. The tenor instrument carries a relaxed and soulful solo in the graceful third movement, and in the finale, all four saxophones are whipped into a frenzy of continually shifting metres and motifs before charging abruptly into the closing cadence.

Instrument list:

spoilerSoloists: soprano saxophone, alto saxophone, tenor saxophone, and baritone saxophone.

Orchestra:

Woodwinds:

Flute (doubling piccolo)

Oboe (2)

Clarinet (in B flat)

Bassoon

Brass:

Trumpet (2)

French Horn (2)

Percussion:

Snare Drum

Tenor Drum

Bass Drum

Glockenspiel

Tubular Bells

Tambourine

Cymbals

Maracas

Hi-Hat

Wood Block

Temple Blocks

Cowbell

Celesta

Strings:

Violins (1st and 2nd)

Violas

Cellos

Basses

 

We are AWAKE and we are DAMAGED>

 

Liv Agar from QAA joins the gang to talk about Wexit - the hare brained scheme to create a promised land for drunk drivers all around the world in Alberta. Also, we discuss the latest evil from the TBI, the creation of the Bins Condittieri, and a new Guy enters the pantheon.

Alberta: the Baudrillard Province

 

In this episode, Sal Mercogliano — a maritime historian at Campbell University (@campbelledu) and former merchant mariner — discusses the video released by the Houthis on the sinking of the Greek-owned and Liberian-flagged bulk carrier Magic Seas, and the deadly attack on the bulk carrier Eternity C on July 8, 2025.

His bias is generically with sailors so he's vaguely anti-Yemen but not as overtly ideologically so. Posting because it's a critical perspective on the conflict which validates the claims of Ansar Allah.

 

One of my favourite hikes in the region. Up in that mountain bowl is Emmaline Lake and to the left is a trail leading over the Mummy Pass into Rocky Mountain National Park.

 

spoilerThe herbicide ingredient used to replace glyphosate in Roundup and other weedkiller products can kill gut bacteria and damage organs in multiple ways, new research shows.

The ingredient, diquat, is widely employed in the US as a weedkiller in vineyards and orchards, and is increasingly sprayed elsewhere as the use of controversial herbicide substances such as glyphosate and paraquat drops in the US.

But the new piece of data suggests diquat is more toxic than glyphosate, and the substance is banned over its risks in the UK, EU, China and many other countries. Still, the EPA has resisted calls for a ban, and Roundup formulas with the ingredient hit the shelves last year. Foam washes up from a body of water onto sandy ground with scrubby plants. ‘We thought we’d got the numbers wrong’: how a pristine lake came to have the highest levels of ‘forever chemicals’ on record Read more

“From a human health perspective, this stuff is quite a bit nastier than glyphosate so we’re seeing a regrettable substitution, and the ineffective regulatory structure is allowing it,” said Nathan Donley, science director with the Center For Biological Diversity, which advocates for stricter pesticide regulations but was not involved in the new research. “Regrettable substitution” is a scientific term used to describe the replacement of a toxic substance in a consumer product with an ingredient that is also toxic.

Diquat is also thought to be a neurotoxin, carcinogen and linked to Parkinson’s disease. An October analysis of EPA data by the Friends of the Earth non-profit found it is about 200 times more toxic than glyphosate in terms of chronic exposure.

Bayer, which makes Roundup, faced nearly 175,000 lawsuits alleging that the product’s users were harmed by the product. Bayer, which bought Monsanto in 2018, reformulated Roundup after the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as a possible carcinogen.

The new review of scientific literature in part focuses on the multiple ways in which diquat damages organs and gut bacteria, including by reducing the level of proteins that are key pieces of the gut lining. The weakening can allow toxins and pathogens to move from the stomach into the bloodstream, and trigger inflammation in the intestines and throughout the body. Meanwhile, diquat can inhibit the production of beneficial bacteria that maintain the gut lining.

Damage to the lining also inhibits the absorption of nutrients and energy metabolism, the authors said.

The research further scrutinizes how the substance harms the kidneys, lungs and liver. Diquat “causes irreversible structural and functional damage to the kidneys” because it can destroy kidney cells’ membranes and interfere with cell signals. The effects on the liver are similar, and the ingredient causes the production of proteins that inflame the organ.

Meanwhile, it seems to attack the lungs by triggering inflammation that damages the organ’s tissue. More broadly, the inflammation caused by diquat may cause multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, a scenario in which organ systems begin to fail.

The authors note that many of the studies are on rodents and more research on low, long-term exposure is needed. Bayer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Despite the risks amid a rise in diquat’s use, the EPA is not reviewing the chemical, and even non-profits that push for tighter pesticide regulations have largely focused their attention elsewhere.

Donley said that was in part because US pesticide regulations are so weak that advocates are tied up with battles over ingredients like glyphosate, paraquat and chlorpyrifos – substances that are banned elsewhere but still widely used here. Diquat is “overshadowed” by those ingredients.

“Other countries have banned diquat, but in the US we’re still fighting the fights that Europe won 20 years ago,” Donley said. “It hasn’t gotten to the radar of most groups and that really says a lot about the sad and sorry state of pesticides in the US.”

Some advocates have accused the EPA of being captured by industry, and Donley said US pesticide laws were so weak that it was difficult for the agency to ban ingredients, even if the will exists. For example, the agency banned chlorpyrifos in 2022, but a court overturned the decision after industry sued.

Moreover, the EPA’s pesticides office seems to have a philosophy that states that toxic pesticides are a “necessary evil”, Donley said.

“When you approach an issue from that lens there’s only so much you will do,” he said.

view more: next ›