punkisundead

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24043159

In the video essay I previously posted - what even IS hierarchy? - by AnRel, AnRel(they/she) claims that there are (among others) prescriptive and descriptive hierarchies in non-monogamous relationship networks. From what I understood:

• Prescriptive means things like primary/secondary, marriage etc where one relationship might have power over the other relationship via agreements, enforcing rules, vetos etc. This seemingly results in a hierarchy that works through power (one of the 3 main components of hierarchy they propose)

• Descriptive means putting current structures of relating into words, kinda describing what the current state is (like "I have 2 anchor partners, I spend X amount of time with them, one is also my nesting partner, I also have a comet)" so people are able to choose if they want to enter a relationship with these existing dynamics. They argue, that there is still a hierarchy in play, this time on the axis of priority (another on of the 3 main components of hierarchy they propose). So some relationships have prioritized access to ressources / time / attention etc.

• The part of the video I am talking about starts at 14:30

AnRel seemed to be opposed to both kinds of hierarchy. While I can easily understand and actively try to dismantle the first one, the second one - "descriptive hierarchy" - is something I can see in my, its hard for me to see how its a negative / authoritarian thing. I struggle to see ways to dismantle it, how it would look without this kind of "ranking of priorities" and how I & my relationship would benefit from it.

Anyone here has some experience to share / opinions on this?

In the video essay I previously posted - what even IS hierarchy? - by AnRel, AnRel(they/she) claims that there are (among others) prescriptive and descriptive hierarchies in non-monogamous relationship networks. From what I understood:

• Prescriptive means things like primary/secondary, marriage etc where one relationship might have power over the other relationship via agreements, enforcing rules, vetos etc. This seemingly results in a hierarchy that works through power (one of the 3 main components of hierarchy they propose)

• Descriptive means putting current structures of relating into words, kinda describing what the current state is (like "I have 2 anchor partners, I spend X amount of time with them, one is also my nesting partner, I also have a comet)" so people are able to choose if they want to enter a relationship with these existing dynamics. They argue, that there is still a hierarchy in play, this time on the axis of priority (another on of the 3 main components of hierarchy they propose). So some relationships have prioritized access to ressources / time / attention etc.

• The part of the video I am talking about starts at 14:30

AnRel seemed to be opposed to both kinds of hierarchy. While I can easily understand and actively try to dismantle the first one, the second one - "descriptive hierarchy" - is something I can see in my, its hard for me to see how its a negative / authoritarian thing. I struggle to see ways to dismantle it, how it would look without this kind of "ranking of priorities" and how I & my relationship would benefit from it.

Anyone here has some experience to share / opinions on this?

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24028405

invidous link

invidous link

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/37693294

Das hat der arme Frosta Konzern wirklich nicht verdient. Er hat doch Recht mit "ohne Haken". 😢

Quelle Schleppnetzfang: "Unser" Alaska-Seelachs wird im Nordost-Pazifik mit pelagischen Scherbrettnetzen gefangen. (3.99€)

Für die Masochisten: älterer LinkedIn Post, in dem abgefeiert wird, wie geil das die Leute verarscht ("Ohne Haken sagt mir nämlich: ich kann es genießen" - "tolle Idee, fantastischer Job" - "und jetzt nur noch fleißig Fischstäbchen kaufen")

Obligatorischer Bill Hicks on "Marketing"

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/22730020

archived (Wayback Machine)

A reminder folks: people engage in this kind of radical protest because it works:

Results of two online experiments conducted with diverse samples (N = 2,772), including a study of the animal rights movement and a preregistered study of the climate movement, show that the presence of a radical flank increases support for a moderate faction within the same movement. Further, it is the use of radical tactics, such as property destruction or violence, rather than a radical agenda, that drives this effect. Results indicate the effect owes to a contrast effect: Use of radical tactics by one flank led the more moderate faction to appear less radical, even though all characteristics of the moderate faction were held constant. This perception led participants to identify more with and, in turn, express greater support for the more moderate faction. These results suggest that activist groups that employ unpopular tactics can increase support for other groups within the same movement, pointing to a hidden way in which movement factions are complementary, despite pursuing divergent approaches to social change.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/41446137

Cross-posted from "Evergreen" by @InevitableSwing@hexbear.net in !slop@hexbear.net

Was denkt ihr dazu?

Ich hoffe, dass die Betreibys mit klarer Anti AfD Positionierung (bspw regelmäßige Veranstaltungen dazu, Banner an der Außenfassade usw) das Vertrauen der "Musikszene" zurückgewinnen und damit auch noch ihrem Vermieter eins auswischen könnenn.

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/20285751

https://archive.is/hqXeR

Das Outing ist übrigens hier nochmal zu finden https://kontrapolis.info/15363/

https://archive.is/hqXeR

Das Outing ist übrigens hier nochmal zu finden https://kontrapolis.info/15363/