191
submitted 2 months ago by bdonvr@thelemmy.club to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 45 points 2 months ago

packwatch I'm not going to shed any tears if she's executed but I also kinda hope it gets downgraded to a life sentence.

[-] booty@hexbear.net 50 points 2 months ago

I'm against killing prisoners but I'm 100% for keeping the death penalty on the books just so you can sentence all billionaires to death before graciously lessening their sentence

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

I am a little (emphasis on little) surprised how many people on here and on the X seem ok with this.

[-] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 35 points 2 months ago

Did you think it was all a bit and we didn’t actually want the billionaires to die?

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

I thought there was a little more pushback on the death penalty. I don't doubt that people want to see the end of billionaires.

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 25 points 2 months ago

The death penalty is bad when wielded by bad people for bad reasons, and good when wielded by good people for good reasons. Materialism ain't that complicated, Dakota.

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

My personal belief is that it is always bad.

[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 28 points 2 months ago

My personal favorite Che quotation

Executions? Yes, we have executed. We execute and we will continue to execute when it is necessary. Our fight is a fight to the death.

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

Well Che was leading an armed revolution. This is a trial in an established state.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So there are situations in which it’s not bad, but necessary?

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

Any action that results in taking a life is a tragedy. That it is necessary for people to be killed during a war in order to prevent the slaughter of innocent people is ludicrously stupid in an age where there are enough resources to support the world's population. Executions during an ongoing revolution fall into a gray area that may qualify as self defense, as letting the person live may result in the deaths of more people.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

Letting any billionaire live inevitably results in more death and misery. When does the state of war/revolution end?

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

So if a billionaire is stripped of and isolated from their resources, and sent to be re-educated, they will still lead to more death and misery? There is no possible path to becoming a functioning member of society?

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Generally agree when it’s in peace time. But defrauding workers like this? Very few countries in this world ever punish these people, and even in the socialist ones, the rich enjoy immense privilege. The death penalty may not deter an average guy from committing heinous crimes because he has no expectation of decency from his society. But it does put the fear of god into the people who think they’re untouchable. Now, for Vietnam to weed out its corruption from the top so shit like this needs to happen less.

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

Disagre, there's no such thing as a good death penalty presided over by good people, it's too risky, too high a chance for a mistake even in the best system

Unless it's a billionaire, then there can't be a mistake

[-] Owl@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago

It's not ideal, but it would take a great deal of effort to restrain a billionaire's influence (merely stripping their assets and imprisoning them isn't enough), and while I would prefer a society that spends that great deal of effort to save people, there are still homeless and starving people whose lives could be saved with less effort.

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago

billionaires are kinda like monarchists, they could "abdicate" and peacefully live out the rest of their life as a dirt farmer or work in a factory they used to own but most of them would rather die than be a normal person.

[-] yoink@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago

imo it is a minor form of liberalism to believe that there exists any amount of punishment and recuperative effort that would meaningfully remove the very power and influence that got said billionaire to this point in the first place

[-] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

No half measures, Walter

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm against the death penalty because the person thus penalized may not be guilty, and could be rehabilitate. Post revolution I'd say the death penalty should flat out not exist, but for now, there's no way to be wrong about billionaires

They either are or are not billionaires. And if they ARE, they get it in the neck

[-] xkyfal18@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 2 months ago

Gotta love it when capitalist pigs get what they deserve

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago

I’m generally not okay with the death sentence. But I’m also not going to lose sleep over this one. If you dropped dead tomorrow in their factories they won’t even be notified about it. You’ll be replaced before they finish their caviar. Hopefully she’ll be dead before I finish pissing.

[-] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago

Do you understand what these greedy psychopath type of people do to our society?

Death is too good for them.

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
191 points (100.0% liked)

news

23240 readers
583 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS