650
Dawkins (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

It is unlikely that this transphobe will be remembered in a positive light in ten years.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago

He claimed several times that transpeople were just the gender version of "Black Face", so much so they rescinded one of his humanism awards

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 5 points 7 months ago

Wild that you're getting downvoted, I didn't know people actually like Dawkins. Here's The Guardian's article

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 7 months ago

His wording is a bit harsh, but I don't think what he says should receive such a backlash. He expresses hard stances on religion as well, which can hurt people in a similar way as that's also part of their identity.

I think he's not entirely accurate here though, as there can really be biological mixes / nuances in the sex of people. Even if you exclude the gender discussion on top. It's all just a gradual thing I'd guess, even possibly inconsistent in 'percentage' on different parts of the body.

And all in all it's also dependent on our culture how we perceive some things as feminine and masculine.

I don't get why we can't agree that biologically people tend to be on a multidimensional spectrum, which sometimes is too ambiguous for the naked eye to pin a binary value on. Even scientifically it could be difficult to determine. Above all, on the gender side we indeed should have the courtesy to trust how someone feels and likes to be perceived in this world.

But we can also not blame people for expressing uneasiness if the biological sex and gender are too far apart in how we defined it culturally over thousands of years. One cannot avoid some conflict there.

Hopefully we can try to better ourselves and respect others, in both ways.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Remember that time he excused a woman getting sexually assaulted in an elevator by an Atheist, and he just shrugged it off as "A Muslim would have done worse" and claimed she was overreacting... haha... Dawkins is a piece of shit.

He has also argued for Non-Local Consciousness and claims to be a "Cultural Christian", so I wonder if he's even an Atheist anymore....

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 4 points 7 months ago

Do you have a source for that; what I could find in a quick Google about his statements on rape is his arguments on X is bad and Y is worse. Which is more of a logical argument, but this does not include "a Muslim would have done worse".

Quote by him: "Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse. If you think that's an endorsement of date rape, go away and learn how to think."

These statements are bound to be controversial as people might somehow interpret X is not bad as Y is worse. But I would disagree, this is more of a thought experiment in which you can always have a worse situation.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

I absolutely do!

https://skepchick.org/2011/07/the-privilege-delusion/

https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/07/richard-dawkins-draws-feminist-wrath-over-sexual-harassment-comments/352530/

I understand he's a respected biologist and people like him for being one of the "Four Horseman of the New Atheist Movement" (Such an overly dramatic title), but he's a genuinely horrible human being.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 2 points 7 months ago

Interesting, thanks for sharing. It really does seem out of place to suddenly reference the suffering of Muslim women in this context.

He seems to elaborate in that he just thinks this case was an overreaction on the side of the woman who felt uneasy, but that of course is a different discussion. We're not comparing suffering here. I understand the negativity he seems to have brought up on himself better now.

[-] 01011@monero.town 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If you were raised in "the West" then you are most likely passively "culturally Christian" too.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

True, but the thing, as I don't base my entire fucking identity around it to the point where I'm openly bragging about it, despite trying to be the figurehead of New Atheism (New Atheism and Atheism are different things)

[-] 01011@monero.town 1 points 7 months ago

We have to remember that "New Atheism" was/is largely a response to militant Islam and also demographic shift in western nations.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago
[-] 01011@monero.town 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The whole New Atheist movement and cries of cultural xtianity came about due to the rise of militant Islam. They were appealing to a particular audience.

It was always “religion is bad but Islam is especially bad” from Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Ah that, I guess that explains shit like Harris literally demanding a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Islam in his book The End of Faith

Whole thing was still cringe and I'm glad it seems to have lost in the end.

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

claims to be a "Cultural Christian"

What does that even mean? If it includes "I put up Christmas lights" then I guess I'm a Christian too.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

You'll have to ask Dawkins, he's the one going around bragging about being one.

[-] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Disagreed slightly with someone

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago
[-] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

His comments seem somewhat reasonable if not slightly politically incorrect. I feel like having an opinion isn't an option when it comes to the trans topic. Any thoughts counter to the pro trans movement is immediately vehemently wrong.

I have trans friends and respect their choice but also understand that people are allowed to have their own thoughts about the issue.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My entire EXISTENCE being compared to literal racism is not something I should be required to respect. No minority group should be asked to just accept that some people are allowed to be bigoted against them.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

What a tragedy. Can we dig him up and cancel him?

Edit: Who else was thinking he was dead? Lord hep me!

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 7 months ago

Iirc, he had a stroke and then became Twitter friends with JK Rowling.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
650 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

11442 readers
1837 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS