1275
This is hilarious (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 91 points 2 months ago

Sorry i am foreigner too.... what is the train terminology reffered to here?

[-] nickwitha_k 98 points 2 months ago

Just explained this to my Irish wife. To "run a train on someone" in American slang would mean having group sex with that person, potentially consecutively.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 26 points 2 months ago

Trains are consecutive or it's just a boring old gangbang

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 11 points 2 months ago

Yeah, those boring gangbangs, I definitely feel the same way for sure

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago

I'm not a foreigner and had never heard the term before.

[-] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago
[-] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Samus when he says that he means boring and sheltered, get out more.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Samus, she, not??

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Is knowing slang terms for gangbanging really that important?

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Absolutely critical.

[-] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Depends on the kind of life you want to lead I guess

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Bless your heart!

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 months ago

You know how in a train one carriage comes after the other? One ends, then the next one starts?

Running a train on someone means one guy after the other banging them.

[-] arin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I'm American and I have no clue. I'm also a gooner so this must be fringe af

[-] Siethron@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

This is not fringe at all. There's way your a gooner and don't know what this means. People even use the terminology to describe the Sex scene Stephen King randomly put in "IT". It's a gangbang but one at a time.

[-] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 5 points 2 months ago

I must admit that i've seen my fair bit of films in the genre too but never heard of the term

[-] potkulautapaprika@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

To appreciate dave mustaine level coked up king, you shouldn't watch the 'did okay' movie, nor the earlier 'this is terrible' one, you should go get 'It' part 1 and 2 as books :D

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The earlier one can't be all terrible. They got Tim Curry to play Pennywise

[-] addie@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

Stephen King's books tend to be both very long and contain a lot of internal monologue. That's very much not film-friendly. "Faithful" adaptions tend to drag and have a lot of tell-don't-show, which makes for a "terrible" film. Unfaithful ones tend to change and cut a lot, which makes them "terrible" adaptions. For instance, "The Shining" film has very little to do with the book, but is an absolutely phenomenal movie. King hated it.

"IT" the Tim Curry version has Tim Curry in it, who was absolutely fantastic. A lot of material from the book was cut out - I'm thinking it could be 80% or more. That includes the scene where the children have a gang bang in the sewer. Out of nowhere, with no foreshadowing, and it's never mentioned again if I remember correctly. That might make it a "terrible" unfaithful adaption, but you know something? I'm alright without seeing that.

[-] potkulautapaprika@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Idk, I just meant young king was wild. As for movie adaptations, I think dr sleep did well. Just because you dragged shining into this, ofc it's great:D Kubrick does stuff and jack nicholson stars, it was a good movie, but can understand king hated it.

Then again, the man himself directed maximum overdrive, and that movie sorely needed Bruce Campbell energy:D

Tbf, I actually enjoyed rose red and storm of the century where he was kinda hands on. <- irrelevant afterthought

E: it was pretty weird when first read, but the stand and dead zone won me over later :D

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, I've never seen it, and don't want to. I'm just a fan of Tim Curry. I still maintain his best role was in C&C

[-] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

In murica almost everything is sexualised... So I can guess

[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago
[-] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Although i appreciate you sharing this and that it probably is a video of her hanging out with bad boys, i must admit that i did not watch more than maybe 15 sec of that, combined across a new skips forward.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 2 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/vBjzAdpZzf0?feature=shared

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
1275 points (98.3% liked)

linuxmemes

20363 readers
724 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS