355
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

One of multiple live bullets found on the set of “Rust” by investigators of the 2021 fatal shooting was discovered in the bandolier of actor Jensen Ackles, according to crime scene technician Marissa Poppell.

Poppell disclosed the detail while on the stand during the second day of testimony in the involuntary manslaughter trial of actor Alec Baldwin, nearly three years after cinematographer Halyna Hutchins was fatally shot on the New Mexico set of the Western film.

Asked about the live rounds of ammunition that were discovered on set, Poppell said investigators found some on a prop cart, in a box of ammo and also in two prop gun holsters — the one worn by Alec Baldwin and another worn by co-star Ackles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 138 points 1 month ago

This case has been going on for a while. Offhand, I can think of at least three toddlers who killed themselves or someone else using a gun that the owner knew was loaded.

None of those adults has been arrested. But the guy who was told his gun had blanks is responsible?

[-] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

So it's not exactly about the shooting itself but creating the negligent conditions that allowed it to happen. From what I understand, as a producer he had his crew cut as many safety corners as possible to reduce costs. His direction to cut corners led to oversights in safety, which led to the prop masters making safety mistakes and accidentslly loading a live round into a firearm designated as a prop, which led to a person dying because of an on set accident. If he didn't direct his crew to cut corners, the chances of somebody dying is dramatically reduced and makes this line of work incredibly safe despite the potentially dangerous implements used.

So the case is about "did the executive decisions Baldwin make to cut corners on safety contribute to the death of someone on set?"

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Again, I point out that parents of children who killed/died aren't being held to the same level of responsibility.

[-] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

They should be. Is that your point? That they should be, because I think any sane person would agree.

If you're arguing that the responsible parties in this incident shouldn't be prosecuted because another person is getting away with manslaughter… well that's a bit silly isn't it?

I can't tell what your intentions are, because nuance is hard via text

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

Not to derail but I just want to say that this is an impeccably crafted and balanced comment.

[-] Nyxon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I spotted it too, it is well reasoned with an excellent flow of thought. I appreciate that others see it too and commented on it.

[-] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

NGL I rode the high from these two comments for like three days ♥️

[-] Nyxon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

And your reply did the same for me, hope you are having a wonderful week! 🖖

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

My point is that this is a selective prosecution. Either treat Baldwin like the parents, or treat the parents like Baldwin. Laws should be applied fairly.

[-] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Yeah the legal system is not a just system.

That being said, usually the prosecutorial imbalance is against the weak and powerless. In this case, a man with more power, money, and influence than most of us will ever see in a lifetime is being held responsible for cutting corners. Can you imagine if Boeing execs were actually held accountable? Or Chase/BoA/Wells Fargo et. al.? It rarely happens.

Is it unjust that the protection is selective? Yes. In the balance, I'd rather the scales be weighted against the powerful, rather than how it normally is.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -5 points 1 month ago

Comparing Baldwin to Boeing is like comparing your local deli to McDonalds.

He's got a net worth of $70 million. He's been a successful actor for decades, but he's nowhere near being a billionaire.

[-] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

That's just taking the comparison in bad faith. It's not about net worth, it's about their power and responsibility. Who's at fault for Boeing's planes failing? The execs cutting corners to maximize profits or the minimum wage employees just doing what they're told?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure that the person who put live bullets in the weapons was told not to put live bullets in the weapons.

[-] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You seem weirdly invested in Alec Baldwin's well-being. I don't think there's anything productive left to be said about this, so I'll wish you peace, and long life

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

You seem weirdly blind to how bad this kind of selective prosecution is.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Bald wins prosecutor is not allowed to do his job, because some other prosecutor didn’t?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -4 points 1 month ago

If a cop lets everyone break the speed limit, and then targets the one driver with a ACAB bumper sticker, now the cop is doing his job?

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

Has this prosecutor been in charge of prosecuting any of the other shootings you're referencing?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

2 of 2

The manslaughter trial against Alec Baldwin over the fatal shooting of Rust cinematographer Halyna Hutchins has been dismissed. Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer threw out the case over how police and prosecutors treated a handful of bullets, which they failed to turn over to the defence.

“The state is highly culpable for its failure to provide discovery to the defendant,” Judge Sommer said. “Dismissal with prejudice is warranted.” The dismissal came as a surprise as gasps were said to be heard in the courtroom and Baldwin was congratulated by his family and supporter

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago

Wrong question.

What you should be asking is 'Were there any shootings in their jurisdiction that didn't get prosecuted?'

[-] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yes they should be, now leave the non sequitur discussion derailing nonsense at the door and stay on topic. Parents being irresponsible dumbasses has nothing to do with a film exec directing his crew to cut safety corners to save a quick buck.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

2 of 2

The manslaughter trial against Alec Baldwin over the fatal shooting of Rust cinematographer Halyna Hutchins has been dismissed. Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer threw out the case over how police and prosecutors treated a handful of bullets, which they failed to turn over to the defence.

“The state is highly culpable for its failure to provide discovery to the defendant,” Judge Sommer said. “Dismissal with prejudice is warranted.” The dismissal came as a surprise as gasps were said to be heard in the courtroom and Baldwin was congratulated by his family and supporter

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago

Sounds like you agree with my point that this is a selective prosecution and that plenty of folks who did worse skated.

[-] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

All prosecution is selective. Parents do get prosecuted for the death of their children. People get arrested for participating in peaceful protests while neonazis march in the streets. People speed past cops as they're pulling someone else over. Unless you want to live in a world where a cop watches your every move and locks you away without trial, it's impossible to prosecute every single crime that happens.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

2 of 2

The manslaughter trial against Alec Baldwin over the fatal shooting of Rust cinematographer Halyna Hutchins has been dismissed. Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer threw out the case over how police and prosecutors treated a handful of bullets, which they failed to turn over to the defence.

“The state is highly culpable for its failure to provide discovery to the defendant,” Judge Sommer said. “Dismissal with prejudice is warranted.” The dismissal came as a surprise as gasps were said to be heard in the courtroom and Baldwin was congratulated by his family and supporter

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago

and that plenty of folks who did worse skated.

[-] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fuck off, stop arguing in bad faith, it's patently clear to everyone in this thread you're arguing in bad faith.

Did you read anything I commented or are you going to strut around like a pigeon on a chessboard arguing a nonsequitur nobody was arguing and everyone already broadly agrees with?

Agreeing that parents should be prosecuted for improperly storing firearms around children, which sidenote a simple fucking google search shows that parents often are prosecuted for improperly storing firearms but they're not famous actor and producer Alec Baldwin so it doesn't make national news, is not agreeing to the idea of not prosecute Alec Baldwin for directing his crew to cut corners in safety protocols.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Apparently you didn't hear the latest news.

A different judge has dismissed the case. Permanently.

They looked at the prosecutor and saw that they'd acted in bad faith, trying to railroad Baldwin.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/fox-news-entertainment-newsletter-alec-baldwins-rollercoaster-rust-shooting-trial-ends-dismissal

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Not really relevant for this topic though

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It sounds like you are saying that unless we prosecute EVERY OTHER case on this issue, we should just forget about it?

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

If a worker dies in a factory line while following instructions, we would all agree that owners of the factory should be held responsible. I don't see why that concept is so difficult to grasp here and so many people are trying to defend Alec Balwdin. The filming set is a workplace and someone died through no fault of their own, but rather by the conditions set by the owners of this production. There were complaints on set about the safety conditions before this incident happened and it seems that nothing was done to mitigate it. Everyone is trying to throw the armorer under the bus, but she was hired and vetted by management, and even after complaints nothing was changed.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -5 points 1 month ago

First, that's not the situation. The boss isn't responsible if a second worker creates a dangerous situation without the owner's knowledge or consent.

Be that as it may, I'm not defending Baldwin; I'm pointing out that a lot of people with much more personal responsibility don't get in trouble when toddlers kill.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

dangerous situation without the owner’s knowledge or consent.

As I mentioned in my last comment, concerns were raised about safety on set before Baldwin shot someone. So knowledge was there.

And yes nobody disagrees, a toddler shooting themselves in the face from a parent's unsecured gun should definitely be punishable

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It was somewhat the same with smoking. We were able to ban smoking from workplaces decades ago by virtue of worker protections and the known health impact. However even today your kid’s lungs have no such protection

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Plus goofing around with a gun is not ok, even if you think there are no live rounds

[-] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I thought he was working on a scene and not "goofing around" when the incident occurred. Was he actually just playing with the "prop" gun?

[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The armorer was apparently target shooting with the gun some time before the scene was being filmed, and left a round chambered. That's my understanding anyway.

Why the fuck the arms master was using prop guns for target shooting is something I'll never understand.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Baldwin then practiced the “cross draw” move and pointed the gun toward the camera, helmed by Hutchins, Souza and a camera operator. Suddenly, they heard a loud bang.

I had previously interpreted descriptions like this as goofing around - I used to do stuff like that with cap guns as a kid - but yeah, you’re probably right

[-] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I think it's relevant whether he observed unsafe practices on set. It sounds like the whole thing was kind of a shit show. Plus the investigation concluded that the gun could not have fired without him pulling the trigger. Pointing a gun at someone and firing when you have reason to believe that proper safety precautions haven't been followed is exactly the sort of thing that might end up with an involuntary manslaughter charge. I dunno if he gets convicted but I don't think the charges are crazy.

load more comments (58 replies)
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
355 points (98.4% liked)

News

22507 readers
3899 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS