406
  • Former President Trump defended his actions regarding the 2020 election, claiming he had the right to interfere and criticizing the charges against him as politically motivated.
  • Trump argued that the legal actions against him set a bad precedent and accused prosecutors of bias, specifically mentioning federal charges and a Georgia case involving alleged election interference.
  • The Harris-Walz campaign condemned Trump's remarks, stating that he is pushing false narratives and emphasizing Vice President Harris's commitment to upholding the rule of law.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 166 points 3 months ago

It still bewilders me why we are even having this conversation. The guy tried to overthrow our government. The government of the people, in accordance of our constitution. If that’s not the definition of treason I don’t know what is.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 63 points 3 months ago

The bewildering part for me is to watch an entire first world nation of millions of thoughtful people just allow all of this to happen and continue to happen.

I gave up on Trump years ago (and I didn't think much of him to begin with) .... much of America is still holding on to him and that is the problem.

Trump as a person and personality is not the problem .... there are hundreds of people waiting on the wings just like him.

It's the American mentality and the people who support this stupidity that are the problem.

It's the American financiers and multi millionaires that enjoy funding and supporting this lunacy that are the problem.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

American finance and corporate lobby enjoy the benefits of political instability and the lack of accountability and regulation from which it results. Citizens United really ratcheted up the bullshit we see today.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Let's be honest, if someone said your company can make another 10%, and you know you will be canned if your numbers don't look good, you think lowering the taxes on your large company suddenly looks better. People are selfish and greedy, they will say well how much can it really hurt the populous, if they even have that much th of a conscience. They have to donate money to get tax breaks, so they donate it to someone who will help them line their pockets. Our tax code entices political bribes/lobbying. So candidates get more money, and companies keep giving it so they can line their pockets, all the while shorting the working class.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes, I can understand but I do not empathize. Citizens United deemed corporations as people and gave them the right to donate to political campaigns. They are not people.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I agree with you, that's why I was saying the tax codes should be changed as well to not incentivise it. Tax the companies (tax brackets would be good as well, so small companies are taxed lower), and no tax cuts for donations. Use the taxes to fund actual support for people, not lining people's pockets.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Which is why John Roberts is a pivotal traitor in American history. None of this would be possible without him. He held the power to stop all this shit before it even started. He is the proximal reason for our predicament.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

thoughtful people

There’s your problem right there

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

The problems are multiple but to me the main problem seems to be a feckless DOJ captained by Merrick Garland whose been asleep at the wheel or at least in the deep pocket of the Federalist Society.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Yes the DOJ is worthless and I frankly believe a plant by the Republican party. Because so far is letting the right get away with whatever they want.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 34 points 3 months ago

trump himself provides the argument for why going after political candidates for "treason" is dangerous. Because if he steals it, you can bet that a LOT of Democrats are literally going to be lined up against a wall and shot (or abused horribly if they are one of the women they are obsessed with...). All because they commit "treason" along the same lines that mtg and the like insisted on impeaching Biden as retribution.

That said, we had four fucking years to investigate this and didn't even start to do anything of worth until year three. And then gave up when one shitty judge stalled and a bunch of shitty politicians declared trump immune from all crimes.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

This is why it's important to lock him the fuck up and make sure it sticks.

He's going to have people lined up and shot regardless if he has to do another insurrection or not. best make sure he can't do that.

[-] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

His supporters will do it for him regardless, mark my words. We're going to see instances of people being shot for being Democrats after the election regardless of who wins.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Well sure, but his fans are the people whose ancestors seceded from the US because they wanted slaves.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
406 points (98.8% liked)

News

23659 readers
3091 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS