this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1612 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

13322 readers
3907 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LongLive@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Error: url1 and url2 are the same

[–] LongLive@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Thank you, I made amends.

[–] Tibi@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I think it's sus that a Math Lecturer decides to post an article about philosophy and then doesn't describe any of the steps he took. The article basically just says i did a thing, but doesnt explain what he did/how to reproduce the result... On the other hand, philosophy is a field with many wrong conclusions and the like, so it is believable. But again in my eyes it's not proven, since it's just 'one guy' saying something and not replicated nor reproduced.

Edit after replied comment edit: The second article you linked (actually the first in the post) changes my believe about the dunning-kruger effect. Thank you for sharing!