this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
92 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
858 readers
448 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments


Oh, well, that explains why it didn't quite look right.
And yep, that's a hell of a lot worse. If it was just "Oh, those two look a lot like a well known scene of Pooh and Tigger! There's a good international relations joke in there because Pooh and Tigger have such an interesting yet friendly relationship, with Tigger always pouncing him and yet they're still close enough for hugs!", well, that'd be understandable, and a lot of younger adults who aren't Pooh fans tend to be... less tactful... with such observations than a Pooh fan might be, so I could accept it as someone simply being mildly rude, but to draw Pooh and Tigger simply to use Tigger's name as racist wordplay?
That guy deserves the fucking wall. Or better, feed him to a tiger. Since letting Tigger bounce him to death isn't possible and it wouldn't be fair to inflict the trauma of killing onto Tigger if it was possible.