this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
84 points (95.7% liked)

Europe

7066 readers
120 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/34873574

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What the fuck is going on with European politicians right now?

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This time, it's judges, not politicians.

Not that this makes it any better, though. German judges tend to be a very special kind of crazy.

[–] talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Previously, this claim was rejected by a lower-level court in Hamburg, but a new ruling by the BGH found the earlier dismissal flawed and overturned part of the appeal, sending the case back for examination.

To me it sounds like there was some formal mishap and that the case is back to square one, from where it is likely to be rejected again. I don't see evidence of any crazy judge this time :)

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago

To me it sounds like there was some formal mishap

No. This special Hamburg court is known to be very corp friendly. That's why all the corps who have trouble with freedom on the internet go there to try and abuse the law.

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In their grounds for the judgement, they have once again displayed an utterly insane understanding (or lack thereof) of computer technology, as typical for people employed in the German legal sector.

I wouldn't trust them any further than I could throw a barrel of paint. (before the judges drank it)

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

It's always been this way. If you have the impression that Europe protects the little guy against those evil tech bros... Well, think about who would have told you that and consider that this is a media empire suing a tech firm.

You can see on Lemmy how it goes. The copyright industry always wants more far-reaching and harsher laws; currently to "protect the poor journalists" from AI. In the US, the constitution and free speech culture with its fair use mandate keeps that in check. Europe proudly doesn't have that.

Note how Germans here blame judges for applying existing copyright law as intended instead of demanding better laws.

Here's Section 14 from German copyright law:

The author has the right to prohibit the distortion or any other derogatory treatment of his or her work which is capable of prejudicing the author’s legitimate intellectual or personal interests in the work.

(This is just to illustrate what the law is like. The media is making a different argument.)