this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
72 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

855 readers
427 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's kind of a lib book, but the people's republic of Walmart (or whatever it's called) shows that central planning and logistics have advanced so much that it's far more achievable than it used to be.

I've also worked doing demand planning and transport logistics for huge supermarket chains and food companies... They manage pretty well, even without supercomputers or fancy optimization algorithms. The systems that already work pretty well could be largely left alone, just changing the key variable from profit to some measure of social benefit. Of course, not every organization has good logistics or planning, nor it's easy to get there, but it is possible!

I have my own criticisms of central planning models, mostly when it comes to governance and community consultation, but it's silly to look at the current global trade networks and say: nope, no planning here! It's impossible to coordinate people towards a common goal if they're motivated to achieve it!

[–] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have read it. It is a lib book. That's why I have seen it in so many 'deprogramming/disillusionment reading lists'.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It doesn't detract from the point about modern logistics having solved many of the problems that plagued earlier implementations of central planning.