this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
295 points (98.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39706 readers
1640 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm thinking even for cases of like shrinkflation.

I saw an article about potentially cheaper RAM here, so it got me curious if things ever really get better on occasion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

it always amazes me how many people buy into the neocon garbage that Carter was a bad president. Dude was a nuclear submariner, helped cleanup a nuclear disaster, built houses with his hands, and his biggest crime to them? he cancelled the B-1 bomber when it became painfully obvious the stealth programs were going to eclipse it's usefulness.

Reagan got elected on treason with iran, and lies about the B-1.

4 years later he was talking about the amount of money the pentagon was spending on 'costumes' as he slid into dementia.

Carter didn't piss and moan, just went on building houses with his hands for 30+ more years.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Carter was also the last president to treat the American people like adults.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

that's insightful; so much of reaganism was 'let daddy take care of things and don't worry your pretty little head about ww3'.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I remember reading his malais speech and thinking that the American people were a bunch of babies for trashing him over it.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

malais speech

I'd heard this mentioned but it was before my time, upon reading it..... holy shit, america, this guy described problems like an adult and you freaked the fuck out and went reagan.

jfc

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yep, the idea that Americans thought Carter was a terrible president bad had me embarrassed since I was in high school.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

it just says so much when they tell you who they think the good ones were.

like, so many of them still idolize trump, and he's a moron.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Carter was the last good president NOT “made for TV”.

Trump is the first “made for internet” president

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

never thought about it that way but valid. yep.

[–] plyth@feddit.org -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That article repeatedly points out the shit-sandwich geopolitical and local political situation with Iran has been going back to Kennedy.

Is it bullshit petroleum company induced meddling and related crimes? For sure. Does it mean landing in Carter's lap means he eats the whole sandwich? I don't agree. YMMV.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The whole sandwich is not for Carter, but the part about handing over the country to Islamists.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

and yet, instead of holding the responsible parties - war hawks, petroleum companies, the bomb-bomb-bomb-iran (barbara ann) caucus, who you know are directly connected to it, you say shit like "carter for handling over the country to islamists'

fascinating.

keep grinding your anti-carter ax, I'm sure it makes you very popular with the youts

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In that sense, no president is responsible because they always are just figureheads.

In any case, if the US hadn't mingled in Iran there would have been no hostage crisis, and no islamistic regime.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

sure thing bud